Sean Renaud
The West Coast Pop
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2004
- Posts
- 59,666
That is not true, it is a pet cause of the WSJ for example. However due to the political opposition, it just isn't discussed publicly...outside college campuses of course. Ideologically, unregulated immigration is the cause which has united the radical left (which sees racial differences as the main obstacle to their utopia) with big business.
If it's not spoken of it really doesn't matter. It's a sufficiently small group that we needn't worry.
Sanders' campaign is finished. If you believe Hillary will overturn Citizens United considering how much money she's received from Wall Street, you're crazy.
I trust her to over turn Citizen's United. Call me crazy we'll find out if she becomes president when she gets to nominate a judge. Until then we'll have no way of knowing.
I doubt most Americans would be prepared to suit and boot up to fight in a war half a world away. I wouldn't. Unless you are prepared to put your own (or your husband/son's) life on the line you are not really "for" these wars. It is easy to preach when someone else has to fight your wars for you.
But someone else will be fighting these wars for the foreseable future. You're right, we'd think twice about it if we were the ones making the sacrifice. But we're not. A bunch of poor kids who are lucky to have jobs are the ones risking life and limb. They should be happy not to be on welfare.
That's the unfortunate long and short of it. Even within the service there is a saying "U Signed the Motherfucking Contract". Politically that is the difference between an all volunteer military and a draft army. People give a shit about a draft army made up of friends and family who had no say in it. People pretend to give a shit about people they don't know who went of their own violtion. Sure they'll thank us for our service, but pitch some money to get us better health care? Nope.
Dems have a warped perception of personal freedoms. They fight against any freedoms that don't harmonize with progressive ideology, and support the few that do.
For example, how many Dems believe:
Low-income housing should not forced on majority-white neighbourhoods to make them "more diverse", as this violates one's freedom of association
The federal government shouldn't create a registry of all gun owners, as this violates one's rights to privacy
The Supreme Court shouldn't force a state to legalize gay marriage if the majority of people there disagree, as this violates one's religious freedom
College campuses should repeal their speech codes which criminalise "offensive" and "hateful" language, because they are politically motivated and violates one's freedom of speech
Everybody has a warped sense of personal freedoms because it's an intensely personal issue.
Most Dems I imagine would support putting low income housing in good positions. Your freedom of association be damned.
There are some who want a registry of all gun owners. The right to privacy is one that comes and goes. The right are the ones defending the the Patriot Act for example. There is a registry for vehicles and all sorts of other things.
The Supreme Court should force states to accept gay marriage. 14the Amendment and Equal protection clause cover that. Don't like it? Change the constitution.
Freedom of speech is another that comes and goes. I don't see you guys championing flag burning.
I call it warped that we actually discuss gay marriage and more than we do interacial or divorce.
