Kilmar Abrego Garcia released from criminal custody in Tennessee

[ll74]

Not at all, watch the linked video.

So you don't have an answer.

It's easy - say words that give the answer.

Normal people: I have a question, please answer the question.

RS- watch this two minute video clip

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

The immigration courts (article II courts), the appeals court has stripped the judicial courts (article III courts) of ANY jurisdiction. Boasberg, et al and the ACLU have been told to fuck off.

Here's how the sausage is made.

The courts are in charge or arresting people??
You might want to read The Constitution.

 

[Rebel5soul]

Watch the fucking video shit for brains.

 

[Rebel5soul]

As ordered by the court of appeals;

1. Garcia can be detained and NO federal judge can order otherwise. WHY? Because Article III courts have NO jurisdiction.

2. Garcia is under FINAL ORDERS OF DEPORTATION the orders are stayed for 30 days (beginning last Fri.) pending Garcia's appeal to the Immigration Board. If the appeal fails, he's out of here and NO federal judge can say otherwise. WHY? Because Article III courts have NO jurisdiction.

 

[ll74]

So who is in charge?

Hint - Garcia can be deported without contention to Costa Rica

 

[Rebel5soul]

The article II courts shit for brains.

 

[ll74]

The article II courts shit for brains.

That's not correct.

Try again

Also, use the fucking reply button

 

[Rebel5soul]

That is EXACTLY correct.

 

[ll74]

That is EXACTLY correct.

You've not answered the question.

The courts aren't enforcing the law.

Try again

Also, are you allergic to the reply button?

 

[Rebel5soul]

As ordered by the court of appeals;

1. Garcia can be detained and NO federal judge can order otherwise. WHY? Because Article III courts have NO jurisdiction.

2. Garcia is under FINAL ORDERS OF DEPORTATION the orders are stayed for 30 days (beginning last Fri.) pending Garcia's appeal to the Immigration Board. If the appeal fails, he's out of here and NO federal judge can say otherwise. WHY? Because Article III courts have NO jurisdiction.

This is it shit for brains.

 

[ll74]

This is it shit for brains.

That's not the answer.

Trump is in charge of enforcement.

Also, your refusal to use the reply button is intentional. You want to avoid scrutiny.

 

[Rebel5soul]

That's not the answer.

Trump is in charge of enforcement.

Also, your refusal to use the reply button is intentional. You want to avoid scrutiny.

What in the hell do you think Article II means shit for brains?

 

[ll74]

What in the hell do you think Article II means shit for brains?

It's simple. The current President is in charge.

You can't seem to admit that.

 

[Wilson23]

Because Article III courts have NO jurisdiction.

That can't be constitutional. Congress would not have the authority to place immigration proceedings entirely outside the jurisdiction of the independent judiciary, which these immigration courts are not.

 

[Wilson23]

What in the hell do you think Article II means shit for brains?

Definitely not what Trump thinks it does.

 

[Rebel5soul]

It's simple. The current President is in charge.

You can't seem to admit that.

You are Constitutionally ignorant. Article II IS the president shit for brains.

 

[ll74]

You are Constitutionally ignorant. Article II IS the president shit for brains.

Yes, you need to obfuscate the answer.

If it's the President then say the President.

Shit for brains.

 

[Rebel5soul]

That can't be constitutional. Congress would not have the authority to place immigration proceedings entirely outside the jurisdiction of the independent judicuary, which these immigration courts are not.

Read the Constitution you moronic mouth breather. Congress has SOLE province over immigration law and the president has SOLE responsibility to enforce those laws. The article III branch has as much jurisdiction over immigration law as they do the federal budget.

 

[DeluxAuto]

This is it shit for brains.

He's free to go because your incompetent president was too busy scavenging "likes" on Truth Social than actually doing his fucking job, shit for brains.

Oh, and he literally has MS13 tatted on his knuckles.

 

[Wilson23]

The article III branch has as much jurisdiction over immigration law as they do the federal budget.

What, you think the federal courts never heard a case relating to the budget?!

 

[Wilson23]

Oh, and he literally has MS13 tatted on his knuckles.

Who, Trump? Can't say I'm surprised . . .

 

[Hel_Books]

Read the Constitution you moronic mouth breather. Congress has SOLE province over immigration law and the president has SOLE responsibility to enforce those laws. The article III branch has as much jurisdiction over immigration law as they do the federal budget.

Actually, the USA federal courts can declare laws in violation of the Constitution, and that includes laws regarding the federal budget.

As for immigration law:

". . . Immigration litigation plays an important role in resolving complex issues arising in US immigration law. The principal US immigration law is the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).

The role of Federal Courts generally refers to a wide range of legal actions that help people whose applications get stuck in red tape or face unfair procedures.

This post reviews the relationship between Federal Courts and the US immigration laws; focusing on the role Federal Courts play. . . .

The federal system of courts in the United States encompasses all District Courts, Courts of Appeals – known sometimes as “Circuit Courts” – and the Supreme Court. . . ."

 

[Rebel5soul]

Actually, the USA federal courts can declare laws in violation of the Constitution, and that includes laws regarding the federal budget.

As for immigration law:

". . . Immigration litigation plays an important role in resolving complex issues arising in US immigration law. The principal US immigration law is the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).

The role of Federal Courts generally refers to a wide range of legal actions that help people whose applications get stuck in red tape or face unfair procedures.

This post reviews the relationship between Federal Courts and the US immigration laws; focusing on the role Federal Courts play. . . .

The federal system of courts in the United States encompasses all District Courts, Courts of Appeals – known sometimes as “Circuit Courts” – and the Supreme Court. . . ."

That's right, the LAW itself, no more than that. And I think I'll rely on the findings of an ACTUAL federal appeals court than some barracks lawyer. Now, I linked a breakdown on the court of appeals rulings so you can go look for yourself or you can continue to expose ignorance.

 

[Rebel5soul]

He's free to go because your incompetent president was too busy scavenging "likes" on Truth Social than actually doing his fucking job, shit for brains.

Oh, and he literally has MS13 tatted on his knuckles.

Can't read can you shit for brains. Garcia is OUT OF HERE.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Can't read can you shit for brains. Garcia is OUT OF HERE.

Again? You dumb piece of shit.

How much money did your failed administration waste by fucking this up so badly?

DOGE!