Liberal Women are Unhappy

The vast majority of liberal woman are very happy that they did not get stuck with a MAGAt as a mate.

And reading the MAGAts' posts in this thread makes them even more grateful for exercising good judgment.
 
You know you're not gonna ignore me, fool.

And if you do...why you focusing on me? Everybody here jumping your shit and laughing at you, so what makes me worthy of your attention? What's wrong with this picture?
Everyone’s laughing at him? Yet here you are begging for a line in his scene. He's not here for your approval; you’re here because he made you look. The only thing wrong with this picture is that your tired ass is still in the frame.
 
Everyone’s laughing at him? Yet here you are begging for a line in his scene. He's not here for your approval; you’re here because he made you look. The only thing wrong with this picture is that your tired ass is still in the frame.
So If i disagree with him i prove his point? I can only show my disapproval by pretending not to see his stupidity?

Dude your logic is as fucked up as your face 🤣🤣🤣
 
No, it's women selecting you out that makes you an incel.

Thank god your trailer trash genes are gonna get Darwinned.
I'm not here for a selection process. If I were you'd see me over on the Playground. I'm only here for the commentary, so my advice is to pick up your two cents escape while you can.
 
Wish I'd stumbled onto this place before. This is fuckin fun!

You just met the biggest misogynist here. Game, set, and match to you for recognizing his m.o. He’s like a moth to a flame to ALL strong and intelligent women but he especially tries to believe he can belittle minorities.
Yes, please come back and hand him his ass again. Ignore RG - he hates women as well but, as you can tell, he tires quickly on feeling the callouses on his stroke hand. He desires to get laid for real.
 
I'm not here for a selection process. If I were you'd see me over on the Playground. I'm only here for the commentary, so my advice is to pick up your two cents escape while you can.
You don't get it, do you?

This is an entertainment site. You and your stupid-ass comments and racist homophobic rants that all the normal people laugh at and shit all over...

YOU ARE THE ENTERTAINMENT 🤣🤣🤣
 
I'm not here for a selection process. .

You’re funny.

You say women need to produce more babies in able for your culture to survive, yet you take no responsibility for your chauvinism that a large portion of women find repugnant.

You’re trying to play a numbers game while rejecting a major portion of women within your society.

Your attempt at social engineering has a mathematical flaw. 😜
 
So If i disagree with him i prove his point? I can only show my disapproval by pretending not to see his stupidity?
You’re not debating; you’re having a meltdown in real time. You don't have to pretend anything; it's your reflection that you're missing.
Dude your logic is as fucked up as your face 🤣🤣🤣
You've never seen my face.
 
You’re funny.

You say women need to produce more babies in able for your culture to survive, yet you take no responsibility for your chauvinism that a large portion of women find repugnant.

You’re trying to play a numbers game while rejecting a major portion of women within your society.

Your attempt at social engineering has a mathematical flaw. 😜


He so desperately wants his dick to get wet but the tampons keep getting in the way.
 
You’re funny.

You say women need to produce more babies in able for your culture to survive, yet you take no responsibility for your chauvinism that a large portion of women find repugnant.
What culture has survived without new generations of citizens? I find all leftwing women masculinized by feminism to be repugnant as far as relationships go. I have nothing against their right to exist, or to fail at life. I am free to choose not to bring that failure into my own life, however.
You’re trying to play a numbers game while rejecting a major portion of women within your society.
What numbers game?
Your attempt at social engineering has a mathematical flaw. 😜
Tell me all about those mathematics.
 
Have a nice day, chump 🤣🤣🤣

Ooops I misread. Thought he meant you’ll never see my face again. Hmmmm 🤔. No. I’d still say that’s a win for you. Are you a black female interested in an overweight, denture wearing white supremacist living in Ruby Ridge, Idaho? Lol. I seriously don’t think so.

Too bad RG! I tried. Looks like those socks of yours will have to remain sperm starch stiff.
 
We don't care. We can pick and choose or go elsewhere in the pursuit of women suitable for marriage. To put it bluntly, successful men can smash anytime they want, decide if and when, and with whom they're going to share their resources.
You create at least one thread a week about it.
 
I'm actually not surprised that you left out all the other facts, called exculpatory evidence, from your little list.

I wonder what the conclusion would be if you included those items...
Perhaps you specified none because there is none

In every instance when Trump "hoaxes" his relationship with an industrial-scale pedophile, this quote should be restated:

“I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy. He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.” New York Magazine (Oct 28, 2002)
 
Perhaps you specified none because there is none

In every instance when Trump "hoaxes" his relationship with an industrial-scale pedophile, this quote should be restated:

“I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy. He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.” New York Magazine (Oct 28, 2002)
So you're in favor of guilt by association?
 
That's a lie, but stay out if my comments annoy you.
It's not a lie. You whine about liberal women weekly via new threads.

Review the forum for evidence.
And before you get fucking pedantic to squirm - I'm talking on average.....there are actual weeks where you have not posted about them....just not as many when you have.
 
What numbers game?

Tell me all about those mathematics.

Birth rates.

Aren’t low birth rates for your team and higher birth rates for “others” one of your biggest concerns?

How are you going raise birth rates to a sustainable level when you can’t get the majority of women in your own society to give up their autonomy during their fertile years?

A successful woman doesn’t need a man. Many successful women don’t want a masculine mental midget, especially an older one who will demand her to care and attend to him through his convalescence while she’s still young enough to enjoy a good life.

Older wealthy chauvinist men like you rely on younger women to be less successful so they will be dependent. Your success depends on the weakness of others. I

Sure, one man can produce many babies, but birth rates depend on women having more than 2 babies, so every woman you turn off decreases the reproductive rate of your great society. It also puts younger men in competition with you, creating more incels among young men who are snowed into sharing your values.

Hi Uncle Incel. 👋
 
Birth rates.

Aren’t low birth rates for your team and higher birth rates for “others” one of your biggest concerns?
His team's birthrate is zero. No womb. And judging his behaviour no womb in the perimeter either, except she's under severe influence.
 
Well you certainly sound like you're flying high on something . . .

He’s trying so hard to sound masculine! 😅

His latest schtick seems to be this throwback to Clint Eastwood. It would be sad if it wasn’t so funny.
 
Back
Top