Liberal Women are Unhappy

[ll74]

In Yemen, decades ago, Islamists lobbied to have women vote. They knew they could control another huge number of votes and they did. The rural north voted in extremists (now, the Houthis) while the Communist south was divided.
Ilhan Omar is a tool of these people. The Haditha is rife with examples of how and when it is permissible to do anti Islamic things (like march in Pride parades) if it means you get to rule for generations.

You should lobby to have all women's voting be taken away. That is the true MAGA way

 

[Rightguide]

Sorry, no.

Your need to pro generate requires the buy-in of women - all women.

Your policies of male dominance and discouraging women to seek higher education are repugnant to women. You are why many women are rejecting “traditional families”.

This is why I say your policies are counterproductive to your own goals.

So, if not racist, do you claim to be ethnocentric? Or does everyone deserve a place as long as they share your self defeating ideology?

Except my personal policies and beliefs are not "political policies" as you tried to equate. Nor am I a racist as you so ignorantly state.

 

[Rightguide]

You should lobby to have all women's voting be taken away. That is the true MAGA way

According to Pew Research, 46% of women voted for Donald Trump in 2024. Pew Research Center+1

 

[AlexBailey]

Except my personal policies and beliefs are not "political policies" as you tried to equate. Nor am I a racist as you so ignorantly state.

So you aren’t here in the politics section to discuss politics?

Did I state that you are racist? It really seems to have rung your bell. Tender spot?

What I did was ask questions. Is that verboten in your utopia?

Are you more of an ethnocentrist or just a garden variety racist? Are you being replaced?

You misunderstood what you read and ran with it. That seems to be your thing.

 

[ll74]

According to Pew Research, 46% of women voted for Donald Trump in 2024. Pew Research Center+1

so you want women to vote or you don't?

 

[AlexBailey]

According to Pew Research, 46% of women voted for Donald Trump in 2024. Pew Research Center+1

Wrong again Mr Spin.

According to the Pew Research Center report you cited ~ 46% of women who voted, voted for Trump.

Since only about 66% of eligible women voted in 2024, less than 30% of eligible women voters voted for Trump.

It’s not exactly the mandate you want to believe in.


From the Pew report you cited:

About this report​

This Pew Research Center analysis examines voter turnout and voting preferences in the 2024 presidential election through the lens of validated voters.

 

[Rightguide]

Careful men of the right…they’re coming for us!

View attachment 2577611

The mighty oracle of Internet wisdom graces us with the pinnacle of argumentation: a bloated GIF and a sneer. One can scarcely contain their awe at such a masterclass in rhetorical artistry. Truly, why bother with tiresome facts or pedestrian logic when you can summon the thunderous might of an inflated face and no doubt hidden cankles?

 

[LeahWill]

Wrong again Mr Spin.

According to the Pew Research Center report you cited ~ 46% of women who voted, voted for Trump.

Since only about 66% of eligible women voted in 2024, less than 30% of eligible women voters voted for Trump.

It’s not exactly the mandate you want to believe in.


From the Pew report you cited:

To be fair to 'The Dog Botherer' he doesn't have the level of understanding to have spotted that.
He is happier at the...less challenging...shallower end of the pool...
'Man GOOD. Woman BAD' type of stuff.

 

[Rightguide]

Wrong again Mr Spin.

According to the Pew Research Center report you cited ~ 46% of women who voted, voted for Trump.

Since only about 66% of eligible women voted in 2024, less than 30% of eligible women voters voted for Trump.

It’s not exactly the mandate you want to believe in.


From the Pew report you cited:

The classic “let’s slice and dice numbers until the inconvenient truth disappears” routine. Sure, less than 30% of eligible women voted for Trump, but that’s only because nearly 34% didn’t vote at all. If you want to talk mandates, maybe start by addressing why so many opted out rather than pretending their silence equals approval of your preferred candidate. In any case, 46% of actual women voters is hardly a negligible chunk, and it sure as hell isn’t a landslide repudiation. So, Mr. Spin, let’s keep the math honest and the narratives honest too. Reality isn’t your favorite spin subject, but it doesn’t care.

 

[AlexBailey]

The classic “let’s slice and dice numbers until the inconvenient truth disappears” routine. Sure, less than 30% of eligible women voted for Trump, but that’s only because nearly 34% didn’t vote at all. If you want to talk mandates, maybe start by addressing why so many opted out rather than pretending their silence equals approval of your preferred candidate. In any case, 46% of actual women voters is hardly a negligible chunk, and it sure as hell isn’t a landslide repudiation. So, Mr. Spin, let’s keep the math honest and the narratives honest too. Reality isn’t your favorite spin subject, but it doesn’t care.

I’m not the one pretending and pushing a false narrative here.

I fully acknowledge that the Democrats screwed the pooch in their run up to the 2024 election. Biden was way too old to be president and although Kamala was the next in line within the administration she did not go through the proper primary process.

So yeah, there were a lot of disaffected democratic voters.


Trump supporters came out in much higher percentages among registered voters.

Still, facts are facts, no matter how inconvenient. Less than 1/3 of eligible women voters went for Trump.

 

[Rightguide]

I’m not the one pretending and pushing a false narrative here.

I fully acknowledge that the Democrats screwed the pooch in their run up to the 2024 election. Biden was way too old to be president and although Kamala was the next in line within the administration she did not go through the proper primary process.

So yeah, there were a lot of disaffected democratic voters.


Trump supporters came out in much higher percentages among registered voters.

Still, facts are facts, no matter how inconvenient. Less than 1/3 of eligible women voters went for Trump.

So, back to your initial flawed point. The MAGA way is not to take the voting rights away from women. We cherish the votes of normal women.

 

[SebastianHolt]

A trumptard that doesn't understand women. I'm shocked.

what are you talking about as you play with little boys under the age of 8

 

[HumpDayHoratio]

 

[Bn2f]

View attachment 2577628

I mean, if you’re a republican or dem anything it goes to reason that you would vote along what the party decides.
But hey, listen to me!
Don’t you ever let logic play into your way of thinking.

 

[AlexBailey]

View attachment 2577628

Isn’t that backward according to the usual MAGAs?

 

[AlexBailey]

So, back to your initial flawed point. The MAGA way is not to take the voting rights away from women. We cherish the votes of normal women.

You’re spinning so hard you’ve got yourself dizzy.

Where did I ever say that?

I was recognizing how you want women to be subservient to men and to prioritize motherhood over education, careers, and independence.


Meanwhile, I’m still wondering what essential role masculine men play in your drive to increase birth rates.

Women don’t need masculine men. Many are happier without them.

Masculine men can’t raise the birth rate without a buy-in from a high percentage of women.

 

[HumpDayHoratio]

I mean, if you’re a republican or dem anything it goes to reason that you would vote along what the party decides.
But hey, listen to me!
Don’t you ever let logic play into your way of thinking.

Isn’t that backward according to the usual MAGAs?

Weeeeee…right over your heads…as usual.

But hey! The good news is I got two fish in an hour!

 

[Bn2f]

Weeeeee…right over your heads…as usual.

But hey! The good news is I got two fish in an hour!

Ya gots nothin. Zero. Zilch.
Folks here have to explain your memes back to you, dipshit.

 

[Rightguide]

You’re spinning so hard you’ve got yourself dizzy.

Where did I ever say that?

I was recognizing how you want women to be subservient to men and to prioritize motherhood over education, careers, and independence.

I never said that. I said men want traditionally feminine wives. There's a difference.

Meanwhile, I’m still wondering what essential role masculine men play in your drive to increase birth rates.

I'm not personally interested in increasing the birthrate. I guess you can't read.

Women don’t need masculine men. Many are happier without them.

Yes, they want to work the rest of their lives and have a cat. I get it.

Masculine men can’t raise the birth rate without a buy-in from a high percentage of women.

My apologies, I mistook you for your brother ll74.

 

[AlexBailey]

I never said that. I said men want traditionally feminine wives. There's a difference.

You’re trying so hard to put the right spin on your chauvinist misogyny. You spell out your opinion quite well below:

That's not true. My comments are only concerned with women who want to be married at some point, but do everything in their power to reduce their value to a man who wants to have a family of his own. Women forget it is men who decide and dictate the qualities of a suitable wife. If they don't see what they want, they go elsewhere before they gamble half of all that they own on the choice. We can blame society for erecting the legal system that allows a conniving unfaithful wife to strip her husband of half or more of what he owns, his children, and his money. That's the core reason why men are rebelling and going elsewhere.

I'm not personally interested in increasing the birthrate. I guess you can't read.

Oh, you got me!

I conflated the shit you post with the shit you believe. Thanks for straightening that out.

Well, we know that by 2070 it will lose close to half of its population.

Superpower Denied: China Isn’t Having Babies Anymore​

A nation and its attendant economy are only as strong and great as its population base. A key factor undergirding that population is a nation’s total fertility rate. And China is one of the leading nations in the fertility collapse. In fact, it has long been speculated that China is slated “to get old before it gets rich.”


By
Brandon Weichert

https://www.19fortyfive.com/about-us/

China’s population could halve within the next 45 years, new study warns​

• Researchers say previous estimates may have severely underestimated the pace of demographic decline
• Census data says the birth rate was 1.3 children for each woman last year – well below the level needed to stop the population from falling

Stephen Chenin Beijing
+ FOLLOW
Published: 11:15pm, 30 Sep, 2021

https://www.scmp.com/news/china/sci...petual_scroll&pgtype=article&campaign=3150699

Yes, they want to work the rest of their lives and have a cat. I get it.

No, you don’t get it. Women have the ability to thrive without men. A cat is less of a burden than an old man sitting around, stinking up a chair and expecting hot meals.

 

[AlexBailey]

Weeeeee…right over your heads…as usual.

But hey! The good news is I got two fish in an hour!

Neither of them had a bicycle?

 

[Philthy_Phil]

what are you talking about as you play with little boys under the age of 8

you mad bro? lol

 

[Afrodisia]

Still no facts, dumpling.

Those are facts, cupcake

 

[Philthy_Phil]

With the Epstein files coming out, I would say that liberal women are quite happy.

 

[latecomer91364]

Those are facts, cupcake

You need to look up what constitutes a fact, punkin.