Liberal Women are Unhappy

[Rightguide]

The biggest problem with the liberalized feminine Left is that they believe they're better than anyone else. Basically, they're "too good for you."

Yet when they're told that it's EXACTLY that attitude that makes them undesirable, they trot out the "I'm too good for you and I wouldn't do anything with you anyway" thing. As if telling men that the unpleasant attitude that makes them undesirable somehow makes them more desirable.

It's enough to make the mind boggle.

Meanwhile, many women live their entire lives as loving companions. They get married, raise children, and are successful both financially and in life overall.

And no, it's not because they're white. Its because they understand that being a foul mouthed fishwife with an attitude problem doesn't lead anywhere except to the bottom of the barrel of opportunity, dragging their "friends" down with them.

Well said. Plenty of women manage to balance ambition with grace, building families, careers, and stable lives without turning every interaction into a street performance of attitude and profanity. It’s not about race, it’s not about privilege, it’s about mindset. A cooperative, warm-spirited woman can move mountains; a combative fishwife can barely move her own prospects.

Success tends to follow people, men or women, who don’t sabotage themselves with bitterness. Some folks rise by building, others sink by barking at everything that moves. The difference isn’t a mystery.

 

[Meekly_Anna]

Spare me the melodrama, Shakespeare. You’ve built an entire fantasy version of me in your head and then gotten offended at your own hallucination. I haven’t pursued you, I haven’t pursued anyone here, and the only “advances” happening are the ones you keep imagining so you can feel righteously outraged about them. All that lecturing about “treating people as equals,” yet here you are vomiting personal insults like it’s your emotional support hobby. You accuse me of bitterness while writing a paragraph that reads like someone ground up a Tumblr blog inside a blender. And the reproductive-theater monologue at the end? That wasn’t an argument, that was you auditioning for World’s Saddest Edgelord. If you ever decide you want an actual discussion instead of cosplaying an angry subreddit, let me know. Until then, save the fanfiction, you’re projecting on the scale of an IMAX.

 

[ll74]

Well said. Plenty of women manage to balance ambition with grace, building families, careers, and stable lives without turning every interaction into a street performance of attitude and profanity. It’s not about race, it’s not about privilege, it’s about mindset. A cooperative, warm-spirited woman can move mountains; a combative fishwife can barely move her own prospects.

Success tends to follow people, men or women, who don’t sabotage themselves with bitterness. Some folks rise by building, others sink by barking at everything that moves. The difference isn’t a mystery.

The part you're missing is that you're bitter at women who don't fit the mold you prefer. Instead of just being ok with their choices, you create threads complaining about them.....to the point of accusing them of ruining the world.

You're as bitter, of not more bitter, as those you continually whine about.

 

[HisArpy]

The part you're missing is that you're bitter at women who don't fit the mold you prefer. Instead of just being ok with their choices, you create threads complaining about them.....to the point of accusing them of ruining the world.

You're as bitter, of not more bitter, as those you continually whine about.

There are plenty of women who make their way through life solo yet somehow no one thinks ill of them for it.

OTOH, there are many who, rather than go through life solo, have to make everyone else know that they're the reason they can't find someone to be happy with.

And you think it's the men rejecting them who are the bitter ones.

Black is white, up is down, inside is outside, EVERYTHING you do/say is bass ackwards.

 

[MajorRewrite]

Incels are the weirdest people.

 

[ll74]

There are plenty of women who make their way through life solo yet somehow no one thinks ill of them for it.

There's always someone who thinks ill of someone. The difference is that most people don't create threads about it once or twice a week.

OTOH, there are many who, rather than go through life solo, have to make everyone else know that they're the reason they can't find someone to be happy with.

Lots of people are able to share their feels on the internet. Whether you want to judge them or not is your own issue. I tend to judge people who create threads that judge random internet people.

And you think it's the men rejecting them who are the bitter ones.

It has nothing about rejection.

Black is white, up is down, inside is outside, EVERYTHING you do/say is bass ackwards.

Create another thread telling us about your feels.

 

[Rightguide]

The part you're missing is that you're bitter at women who don't fit the mold you prefer. Instead of just being ok with their choices, you create threads complaining about them.....to the point of accusing them of ruining the world.

You're as bitter, of not more bitter, as those you continually whine about.

I’m never okay with destructive choices that leave women alone, unprotected, and a burden on society in their old age. You spend all day lost in fantasies and bitter projections, but whining and bitterness have never been in my DNA. Take a page from Marcus Aurelius: he valued solitude not as loneliness, but as a vital space for self-reflection and inner strength. In Meditations, he teaches men to embrace that solitude to cultivate reason and virtue, away from the noise of the world. Remarkably, even while commanding an empire through wars, plagues, and chaos, he carved out time for calm and clarity. True strength, he reminds us, isn’t about conquering others; it’s about mastering oneself. You’d do well to expand your home library and your mind. Because men are at their best when at peace with themselves, and that peace is impossible without harmony at home, free from marital tension. Yes, he was a married man as well.

 

[ll74]

I’m never okay with destructive choices that leave women alone, unprotected, and a burden on society in their old age. You spend all day lost in fantasies and bitter projections, but whining and bitterness have never been in my DNA. Take a page from Marcus Aurelius: he valued solitude not as loneliness, but as a vital space for self-reflection and inner strength. In Meditations, he teaches men to embrace that solitude to cultivate reason and virtue, away from the noise of the world. Remarkably, even while commanding an empire through wars, plagues, and chaos, he carved out time for calm and clarity. True strength, he reminds us, isn’t about conquering others; it’s about mastering oneself. You’d do well to expand your home library and your mind. Because men are at their best when at peace with themselves, and that peace is impossible without harmony at home, free from marital tension. Yes, he was a married man as well.

Make another thread about women you hate and tell us all how they should be the way you want. It's not bitterness at all

True strength doesn't spend so much time initiating conversations about women you don't like.

I don't have solitude or loneliness.....you do. And you remind us often how it's your choice to remain so....while telling us all about how it's women's fault often as well.

 

[Rightguide]

Make another thread about women you hate and tell us all how they should be the way you want. It's not bitterness at all

True strength doesn't spend so much time initiating conversations about women you don't like.

You have no intellect.

 

[ll74]

You have no intellect.

lol
Your threads aren't deep.

You do like to believe they are.

 

[Rightguide]

lol
Your threads aren't deep.

You do like to believe they are.

You can put me on Iggy anytime you get tired of reading them.

 

[ll74]

You can put me on Iggy anytime you get tired of reading them.

I'm aware of the feature. Perhaps you should investigate it yourself.

I have no reason to ignore your bullshit...it's more fun to call it out and watch you act like an intellectual....even better when .Arpy jumps in to help you stroke. (Your own ego)

 

[Rightguide]

I'm aware of the feature. Perhaps you should investigate it yourself.

I have no reason to ignore your bullshit...it's more fun to call it out and watch you act like an intellectual....even better when .Arpy jumps in to help you stroke. (Your own ego)

You have yet to effectively refute anything I say. It's always a personal attack. Always know I can handle either, but they stunt your credibility.

 

[ll74]

You have yet to effectively refute anything I say. It's always a personal attack. Always know I can handle either, but they stunt your credibility.

Your entire position is hatred of women making their own choices differently than you believe they should.

I don't need to refute that.

Your misogyny is not an insult....it's a personality attribute of yours.

 

[icanhelp1]

You have yet to effectively refute anything I say. It's always a personal attack. Always know I can handle either, but they stunt your credibility.

Be careful! ILL74 has anointed himself Lit's moral compass.

 

[ll74]

Be careful! ILL74 has anointed himself Lit's moral compass.

Lol....poor butthurt Icant.

Did you daughters school you on your bullshit yet or are you afraid to discuss your views with them? I know I would be if I were you.

 

[Rightguide]

Your entire position is hatred of women making their own choices differently than you believe they should.

That is an outright lie. I do not hate all women. I dislike woke leftwing women and feminists.

I don't need to refute that.

Your misogyny is not an insult....it's a personality attribute of yours.

My comments are not misogyny. Criticizing woke feminism is not misogyny because it targets specific ideas and cultural trends, not women as a whole. Rejecting woke feminism’s claims or methods is an exercise of free thought and reasoned debate, not an expression of hatred toward women. To conflate critique of an ideology with misogyny is to silence dissent and discourage nuanced discussion, which ultimately harms everyone, including women. But you know this, and choose to lie instead.

 

[ll74]

That is an outright lie. I do not hate all women. I dislike woke leftwing women and feminists.

Lol

My comments are not misogyny

They are.

. Criticizing woke feminism is not misogyny because it targets specific ideas and cultural trends, not women as a whole.

Of course

Rejecting woke feminism’s claims or methods is an exercise of free thought and reasoned debate, not an expression of hatred toward women. To conflate critique of an ideology with misogyny is to silence dissent and discourage nuanced discussion, which ultimately harms everyone, including women. But you know this, and choose to lie instead.

Haha.....dude.....me calling you out isn't "silencing dissent"....if that were the case, you wouldn't be posting here.....because you would be silenced.......weekly threads about the same topic certainly isn't silence.

In term of discussion, all you do is complain....you don't want discussion. Women in the world do shit you don't like and you declare that they are ruining the world. What discussion do you want to have on that?

 

[icanhelp1]

Lol....poor butthurt Icant.

Did you daughters school you on your bullshit yet or are you afraid to discuss your views with them? I know I would be if I were you.

Not butt hurt at all.

You're ignorant. You just can't handle the fact that there is a psychological difference when a male violates a 15 year old as compared to a male that violates a 6 year old. Violating a prepubescent is the qualifying factor for pedophilia. The statutes reflect that. Megyn Kelly was not defending Epstein for his crimes, she was simply attaching the correct definition. Johnson is a fucking hack along with CNN.

 

[ll74]

Not butt hurt at all.

You're ignorant. You just can't handle the fact that there is a psychological difference when a male violates a 15 year old as compared to a male that violates a 6 year old.

There is no difference. That's what you don't understand. There is a difference in how the victim may look and behave...there is no difference in the actions taken by the man.

Violating a prepubescent is the qualifying factor for pedophilia. The statutes reflect that. Megyn Kelly was not defending Epstein for his crimes, she was simply attaching the correct definition. Johnson is a fucking hack along with CNN.

Fuck off. As requested - discuss this with your daughters....tell them about that difference and ask them how they feel about your position. I dare you.

 

[icanhelp1]

There is no difference. That's what you don't understand. There is a difference in how the victim may look and behave...there is no difference in the actions taken by the man.


Fuck off. As requested - discuss this with your daughters....tell them about that difference and ask them how they feel about your position. I dare you.

Leave my daughters out of it you lowlife maggot.

 

[ll74]

Leave my daughters out of it you lowlife maggot.

You brought them into it, dipshit. I didn't even know you had kids.

Your position is against their safety and they should hear that from you.

 

[Lazaran]

Leave my daughters out of it you lowlife maggot.

DonOld could sexually assault ineedhelp1’s daughters on Fifth Avenue and not lose ineedhelp1’s support…



ineedhelp1



We. Told. Them. So.

 

[icanhelp1]

You brought them into it, dipshit. I didn't even know you had kids.

Your position is against their safety and they should hear that from you.

Michael Seto, professor of psychiatry at the University of Ottawa, told Newsweek via email Thursday that the medical community defines pedophilia "as a sexual attraction to prepubescent children, i.e., children who are not yet showing any physical signs of pubertal development." He noted that "children vary in the age when they start puberty, but this is typically age 13 or younger."

Seto explained that "Hebephilia refers to pubescent-appearing children," or children who have started going through puberty, "but they are still obviously not adults; typically they are young adolescents, ages 13 to 15."

The terminology is important to the medical community, Seto says, noting that "whether someone has pedophilia or hebephilia — or not — is important to distinguish clinically because it is relevant to risk assessment and treatment. But I also recognize that for many people this distinction is not important because they are understandably outraged that children of any age or stage of physical development are being sexually harmed."

Your condition is common but it doesn’t change the fact that age makes a difference both clinically and legally.

 

[ll74]

Michael Seto, professor of psychiatry at the University of Ottawa, told Newsweek via email Thursday that the medical community defines pedophilia "as a sexual attraction to prepubescent children, i.e., children who are not yet showing any physical signs of pubertal development." He noted that "children vary in the age when they start puberty, but this is typically age 13 or younger.".

What part of that is not the mans fault for their actions?

Seto explained that "Hebephilia refers to pubescent-appearing children," or children who have started going through puberty, "but they are still obviously not adults; typically they are young adolescents, ages 13 to 15."

What part of that is not the man's fault for their actions?

The terminology is important to the medical community, Seto says, noting that "whether someone has pedophilia or hebephilia — or not — is important to distinguish clinically because it is relevant to risk assessment and treatment. But I also recognize that for many people this distinction is not important because they are understandably outraged that children of any age or stage of physical development are being sexually harmed."

What part of that is not the man's fault for their actions?

Your condition is common but it doesn’t change the fact that age makes a difference both clinically and legally.

I don't have a condition. You're qualifying heinous behavior into groups that make you feel better about yourself.