"Liberals!"

For a person with no credibility, wise and patient wmrs2 certainly has your intellectual ass tied in a knot. Did you read your post? You make no sense at all. Wmrs2 said something and laid out a position which you totally ignored and went directly to a personal attack on her. If you consider what she said to be grandiose (which is misspelled), you are totally out of your league in historical debate.

Grandiose is correct according to the Oxford Dictionary of English.

Again you make unsustained assertions: "wise and patient wmrs2" I cannot see any justification for either adjective in any of your posts that I have seen.

Og
 
YOURE A TYPICAL CLUELESS MICK.

don't hate me for my youth and ability to hold an erection you doddering old redneck.



that being said, why do people bother to argue with wrms or wmrs or worms or whatever he/she/it calls her/him/itself? Like fundies and reactionaries and amici everywhere they are so convinced of their superiority to everyone else that the concept of new ideas is beyond their ken.

let them die quietly and save us all the headache.
 
don't hate me for my youth and ability to hold an erection you doddering old redneck.



that being said, why do people bother to argue with wrms or wmrs or worms or whatever he/she/it calls her/him/itself? Like fundies and reactionaries and amici everywhere they are so convinced of their superiority to everyone else that the concept of new ideas is beyond their ken.

let them die quietly and save us all the headache.

No Ren, you're missing the point. Nobody is arguing... arguing would require that ANYBODY gave ‘ol wormy even a modicum of respect.

This is troll watching (you know, a hobby like bird watching only bigger droppings). Worm is just like a big stupid ass pigeon that eats his own shit after the bread crumbs are all gone.
 
You said you were disabled but you never said you were mentally disabled.

I don't care who you are or what your problem is. GO to HELL!. I do believe in hell and I'm sure you will be there. :mad:

That was beyond uncalled for you son of a bitch.:mad:

Is this the kind of Christianity you are wanting to teach all these heathens and atheists? If it is, you are teaching them everything that is in direct contrast to what Jesus himself taught. Congratulations on showing your true colors.

Would Jesus have said that? I am positive He would not have.
 
Last edited:
Grandiose is correct according to the Oxford Dictionary of English.

Again you make unsustained assertions: "wise and patient wmrs2" I cannot see any justification for either adjective in any of your posts that I have seen.

Og
Now Og, when in Rome, you know what to do. Therefore, in the USA we revise English spelling to match our dictionaries. You must use our spelling when entering the USA. There has also been some discussion of disallowing your hat on this forum. It is too English.
 
don't hate me for my youth and ability to hold an erection you doddering old redneck.



that being said, why do people bother to argue with wrms or wmrs or worms or whatever he/she/it calls her/him/itself? Like fundies and reactionaries and amici everywhere they are so convinced of their superiority to everyone else that the concept of new ideas is beyond their ken.

let them die quietly and save us all the headache.
What new ideas? We can not help the felling of superiority, which is not due to our quality but it is due to the lack of quality of our debate opponents. In you efforts to disprove our assertions, you make RABD out of yourself. Don't jump to conclusions for we mean RABD in the generic sense of operationally defined terminology. How's that for a new idea?
 
Now Og, when in Rome, you know what to do. Therefore, in the USA we revise English spelling to match our dictionaries. You must use our spelling when entering the USA. There has also been some discussion of disallowing your hat on this forum. It is too English.
Do we know that the internet is not America?

I think this is Boston Freddie, I'll bet three potato chips. Any takers? What are my odds?
 
In the style of Jeff Foxworthy, the comedian, You can tell you are a Liberal if:

...you believe abortion is a matter of women's reproductive rights and not the premeditated taking of a human life.

...you believe that same sex relationships exist on an equal par with hereto sexual activities.

...you belief that the public should be educated by confiscating funds from all citizens to education your children.

...you believe that the rest of the people should pay for your health care.

...you belief in the class warfare of labor versus business and that labor unions are anything but the use of force and coercion.

...you believe that 'war' is never an option in defending individual rights and properties and the sovereignty of a nation.

...you believe the environment is of greater importance than the people.

...you believe that global warming is caused by man and not normative climate change.

...you believe that 'rights' are the province of the whole and not the individual.

...you believe that African Americans and Native Americans deserve compensation or affirmative action or 'quota's' for any reason

~~~~~

If you 'believe' in any single one of those things, you are a Liberal. Even if you are a 'single issue', liberal, you are still a liberal. Not only that, but since each and every one of those issues is at odds with all that it means to be American, all what it means to respect the Constitution and Bill of Rights, it means that you are anti American.

Thas why 'modern' liberals is a pejorative reference.
 
I can hear...in the distance, the cheering of the million bastards (children without fathers) born each year in the good ole USA, thanks to your effete liberalism.

ami
 
I can hear...in the distance, the cheering of the million bastards (children without fathers) born each year in the good ole USA, thanks to your effete liberalism.

ami

Last I checked, ami, that was the fault of men who can't keep it in their pants, and then walk away from their kids, not "Liberals." All my children have fathers, thankyouverymuch, and I can't have any more, so don't lay that shit at my feet.
 
So, you have heard of the looking glass self.

Do we know that the internet is not America?

I think this is Boston Freddie, I'll bet three potato chips. Any takers? What are my odds?

Nope. I don't think it's not Freddie. Freddie will usually tell you that he thinks you suck to your face. (right SR?)

So I'll see your three chips and raise you three more on it either being an alt of xecessive (or however you spell his freakin name) or La Joke.




ETA After reading the post below this one = AMICUS!
 
Last edited:
I don't care who you are or what your problem is. GO to HELL!. I do believe in hell and I'm sure you will be there. :mad:

That was beyond uncalled for you son of a bitch.:mad:

Is this the kind of Christianity you are wanting to teach all these heathens and atheists? If it is, you are teaching them everything that is in direct contrast to what Jesus himself taught. Congratulations on showing your true colors.

Would Jesus have said that? I am positive He would not have.
We have been very patient with your barbs and approval of the slurs your friends have thrown at us. Finally, we thought it was time to make one comment about your obvious disdain of us and you fall apart. To be a Christian you need to tolerate persecution a little better than you have.

Was Jesus showing his true colors when he drove the heathen out of the temple of God with a whip? Was he showing disdain for the leaders of his forum when he called them generations of snakes? Jesus never taught that believers had to listen to all the guff and criticism offered by people who really did not know God. We are allowed to dust you off the bottom of our feet. Our comment that you were mentally disabled was a good joke but oh so true. If you dish it out, you must be able to take it.

You need to hear something about yourself and it is true of everybody. You are not what you say you are but you are what you do. We hear a lot of criticism of Amicus on this forum. He responds with good logic and without name calling. People hate him for his honest approach because he challenges their ideas, which they resent more than being called names. In every way he responds like a Christian, although he claims to be an atheist. We have a difficult time of thinking of him any less than a Christian. We would certainly think of him as more of a Christian than you; although you call yourself a Christian, you act like a heathen. If God had to choose which of you went to hell, we would not expect Amicus to be there but you would be no surprise to us.

You did not have to choose to be mean spirited towards us but you could not resit trying to join the liberal crowd. They can have you. God doubtfully wants you on his side and we know you will not help our side to help others be Christian.

Christ never treated people with kid gloves. He was a tough old bird that would have whipped you RABD ass across town and it would not have been a BDSM whipping either. If you want to be thought of as a Christian, you best philosophically get on God's side. You cannot both serve these atheist and liberals and serve God for God will not allow it.
 
Yaknow Cloudy, one bull can impregnate a whole herd of cows, thas rather the way nature worked things out, what with those silly men always fighting and killing each other and doing really stoopid 'man' things, like climbing mountains and crossing oceans just cuz they were there.

Statistics also show that children from single parent families are the ones who drop out of school, commit crimes and populate the prisons. You may deny the connection and still place the blame exclusively on the man, nuttin new there, but others can be objective and see the root causes....which are...feminism and liberalism...

ami
 
Nope. I don't think it's not Freddie. Freddie will usually tell you that he thinks you suck to your face. (right SR?)

So I'll see your three chips and raise you three more on it either being an alt of xecessive (or however you spell his freakin name) or La Joke.

Right on Freddie, but he's so stuck on his own particular "I have a reason to exist" mantras that I can't see him doing a rant without slipping them in.

Not LaJoke, because he's lost in his own particular one-note "make someone else take care of me" sambas. Amicus is the closest of the possibilities I could think of--if I bothered to think about it. It is definitely the alt of someone who has passed through before, though, and I agree with rengadeirishman that it's better to play him/her/it than it is to rail against it/her/him or spit.
 
Last edited:
I can hear...in the distance, the cheering of the million bastards (children without fathers) born each year in the good ole USA, thanks to your effete liberalism.

ami

All childrenl have fathers, unless you are referring to those who were conceived through artificial insemination. :confused:
 
Do we know that the internet is not America?

I think this is Boston Freddie, I'll bet three potato chips. Any takers? What are my odds?

Hmmm, there is a certain cadence, but...I don't know if BFW could pull it off...more power and all if it is him, though. So, I'll see your three potato chips and raise you a frito.

Kind of been an entertaining ride compared to the GB trolls. Unless you take the entity seriously, of course.
 
Nope. I don't think it's not Freddie. Freddie will usually tell you that he thinks you suck to your face. (right SR?)

So I'll see your three chips and raise you three more on it either being an alt of xecessive (or however you spell his freakin name) or La Joke.




ETA After reading the post below this one = AMICUS!

That may be possible, but I just checked and both of them are online simultaneously. That doesn't prove anything, because he might have two computers, but it would be evidence against that possibility. :eek:
 
All childrenl have fathers, unless you are referring to those who were conceived through artificial insemination. :confused:

You are half way there, Box, but my children (twins via IUI) have a wonderful father and her name is Amy. :heart:
 
That may be possible, but I just checked and both of them are online simultaneously. That doesn't prove anything, because he might have two computers, but it would be evidence against that possibility. :eek:

There's someone who doesn't run two computers side by side at the same time? I'm always working in one and playing (or factchecking) in the other.
 
All childrenl have fathers, unless you are referring to those who were conceived through artificial insemination. :confused:


~~~

Awww shucks Box, I know you understand, but what the hell...Octomom, the California lady who gave birth to 8 babies, had them all artificially inseminated along with the three other children she had.

But our single mom syndrome is not so hygenic in the maternal pursuit of motherhood, they like the feel of wet sex, but they want nothing to do with a 'man around the house', so they just take the sperm and run and let the State be daddy.

Been that way for decades...

Amicus...
 
~~~

Awww shucks Box, I know you understand, but what the hell...Octomom, the California lady who gave birth to 8 babies, had them all artificially inseminated along with the three other children she had.

But our single mom syndrome is not so hygenic in the maternal pursuit of motherhood, they like the feel of wet sex, but they want nothing to do with a 'man around the house', so they just take the sperm and run and let the State be daddy.

Been that way for decades...

Amicus...

So you're asserting there are a million bastards as a result of artificial insemination, right?

Why can't you simply say you slightly misspoke? Can't do it, can you? This is how this sort of crap gets spun out.
 
Back
Top