Senna Jawa
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- May 13, 2002
- Posts
- 3,272
Irony
My friend was a popular and respected historian over decades. I know him from being in the same class at the university, just after we finished our high school. He is free of any prejudice, he has a very good (and sharp) pen, I had a chance to see that he is musical, ... He has a lot of great articles to his credit.
Nevertheless, an unfortunate exception, I read one of his about several outstanding professional women over centuries. It's an important, exciting and even moving subject--it's just hard to read about the crude, blatant, cruel, insensitive injustices which those women had to endure. So far so good and even great. Except that the article was written in an ironic style. The author was writing on the behalf of the stupid guys--to make fun of them--like he kind of meant it (with the tongue in his cheek). The effect to me was just awful, to me it was next to unreadable.
This reminds me the awful Polish March 1968. It started with an open anti-Semitic attack by the First Secretary of the Polish United Worker Party (a communist party), already back in 1967. And the vicious attacks went on for many-many months. Jews, especially when they talked to their friends and among themselves, reacted with irony. For the sake of irony, Jews would assume the ironic voice of talking like those awful racists. It was very hard, and most of the time to me it was just impossible to listen to.
Thus in years 1967-8 I got my lesson in irony. One should avoid it or apply in a very small measures, very gently. Otherwise the message is impossible to hear, finally you don't know what is true and what is a pretense.
Earlier I wrote about cases where a logical message is rendered useless by the wrong emotional choice of words. This time people were using an emotional construction on purpose but it was a wrong idea.
My friend was a popular and respected historian over decades. I know him from being in the same class at the university, just after we finished our high school. He is free of any prejudice, he has a very good (and sharp) pen, I had a chance to see that he is musical, ... He has a lot of great articles to his credit.
Nevertheless, an unfortunate exception, I read one of his about several outstanding professional women over centuries. It's an important, exciting and even moving subject--it's just hard to read about the crude, blatant, cruel, insensitive injustices which those women had to endure. So far so good and even great. Except that the article was written in an ironic style. The author was writing on the behalf of the stupid guys--to make fun of them--like he kind of meant it (with the tongue in his cheek). The effect to me was just awful, to me it was next to unreadable.
This reminds me the awful Polish March 1968. It started with an open anti-Semitic attack by the First Secretary of the Polish United Worker Party (a communist party), already back in 1967. And the vicious attacks went on for many-many months. Jews, especially when they talked to their friends and among themselves, reacted with irony. For the sake of irony, Jews would assume the ironic voice of talking like those awful racists. It was very hard, and most of the time to me it was just impossible to listen to.
Thus in years 1967-8 I got my lesson in irony. One should avoid it or apply in a very small measures, very gently. Otherwise the message is impossible to hear, finally you don't know what is true and what is a pretense.
Earlier I wrote about cases where a logical message is rendered useless by the wrong emotional choice of words. This time people were using an emotional construction on purpose but it was a wrong idea.
Last edited: