Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What do you mean? To increase sales?
I would say that was a smart move, the controversy Did move SI out of the obscurity it was starting to slide in.
I'm just having a hard time figuring out their intent re the SJW part.
Most commentators assumed that they wanted to lobby for Muslims and against Islamophobia.
But I can't imagine many Muslim being stoked about seeing such a sexualized depiction of the hijab, on the cover of a mag. that men browse in order to jerk off. It contradicts what the hijab stands for.
Honestly, none of you guys have ever actually known any Muslims, have you? Let alone had Muslim friends. Or spent time with a Muslim family. You see them all as two headed aliens that eat babies.
Help me out here...
Isn't one of the tenants of the religion that women can't be around men who aren't family members?
And, isn't there a tenant against exposing their bodies in public?
And one against promiscuity and/or sexual enticement?
These guys obviously don't read the articles.
She already posed in her "garb" for some type of Miss USA pageant or some such nonsense.
For me, it wasn't that she posted in 'garb'.
I would understand that SI is trying to expand their market and the Muslim community deserve to be catered to as well.
It was her lascivious, sexual pose that startled me.
It gives a confusing message
as opposed to a woman who just posed straight up, smiling for the camera.
I really don't think "SI is trying to expand in to the muslim market".
I think SI is trying to be "edgy" and figured at the very least it would draw attention. The model in question has already posed in the same garb for beauty pageants.
As far as "lascivious, sexual pose"?
Really??
Wait a minute, muslims suck cock too? WTF, i love muslims now!
Not for me and you.
For religious people (be they Muslims, baptists or Amish).
I suspect that they would be more likely offended than greatful to SI.

I really don't think "SI is trying to expand in to the muslim market".
I think SI is trying to be "edgy" and figured at the very least it would draw attention. The model in question has already posed in the same garb for beauty pageants.
As far as "lascivious, sexual pose"?
Really??
I'm sure they'll let you suck their cock once you convert.
Yup.
I'm finding hard to follow the thought process of the SI team.
What do you mean? To increase sales?
I would say that was a smart move, the controversy Did move SI out of the obscurity it was starting to slide in.
I'm just having a hard time figuring out their intent re the SJW part.
Most commentators assumed that they wanted to lobby for Muslims and against Islamophobia.
But I can't imagine many Muslim being stoked about seeing such a sexualized depiction of the hijab, on the cover of a mag. that men browse in order to jerk off. It contradicts what the hijab stands for.
I agree, it is a bit hard to follow what the idea is here. I guess its just to be inclusive, even though it doesn't make much sense. Personally, I think she is a beautiful woman. However, I am a bit worried that for the Muslim extremists, this will still be unacceptable and I fear that she could face some backlash. I hope SI keeps that in mind.
Has SI illustrated the devout Muslim athletes who would rather take a loss than compete against a Jew and take the chance of losing?
![]()
![]()
Such a brave, noble and beautiful religion...
Anyway, these images would be even better if the burkini was painted on not a fabric.
There is no brave, noble and beautiful religion. Only various degree of orthodoxy. Sometimes harmless. (Like dat suit.) Sometimes stupid. (Often a combo.) Sometimes fucked up. (Again, often a combo w stupid.)
Islam, at this point in history, has more of the latter than average. And more of the latter than 40 years ago.
Now... one can yuck it up on the Internet and get one's hate boner on, or one can examine the causes of this trend and what could be done to change it's course. But you know, one of those would actually require thought.
Maybe, for next year's issue, I mean, if they really care about women and not just virtue signaling to please
PEOPLE WHO DON'T EVEN READ THEIR PUBLICATION BECAUSE THE ONLY SPORTS THEY CARE ABOUT ARE
WOMEN'S SPORTS FEATURING TRANSGENDER COMPETITORS!
https://www.foxnews.com/entertainme...ikini-designed-to-hide-kidney-transplant-scar