celiaKitten
pseudo-masochistic
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2001
- Posts
- 11,634
Amen
I'll agree to that statement Pagan..
I'll agree to that statement Pagan..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It has been interesting to me to note that I am not the only one that has gone for years without sex.luv2tvl69 said:I had to pick a decade because it has been 8yrs...closest to that than 5yrs![]()
![]()
![]()
It would be interesting to break out oral sex from intercourse, but I think the former does qualify as sex - it can certainly be as gratifying as intercourse, and probably does help many people with satisfying their sex drive.No physical intercourse for that long, however have had some oral sex, and always masturbation.
I agree - there has to be a physical attraction for most people, and while it may make someone feel better to say looks aren't important, that, in my book, is being dishonest with someone. It is very important to be tactful about appearance, yet more important to be honest.I am pretty sure my weight is 1 reason that keeps guys away: 5'2" 170lbs. In reality looks are impt no matter what people say that it shouldnt matter.
I don't know about top of the list, but some attraction has to be there - after all most romantic relationships have some sexual connotation to them, and physical appearance is an important part of that - it is just human nature.I think and have been told I have very nice breasts and very pretty face, but I find in reality the way someone's body is is definitely at the top of the list of importance for men.
Absolutely. As I said, I need a nice personality/attitude/mind - I could pick up on my friend's ex if I wanted to - she has a nice body, but her mind just turns me off (not very smart, and she thinks that at one time she was abducted by aliens).I do think there has to be some type of attraction, but there is def more ways to be attracted to someone than just their body
We all have our ways of drawing the line - my ex would have casual intercourse, but if she wasn't in love she wouldn't kiss (sometimes).I also have some weird way of looking at intercourse where love is needed. I am a consummate "nice girl" (raised catholic by strong mother--she def did her job well...boo hoo). Odd tho, I am very kinky and open to all sorts of new sexual things, and dont need love for that....just intercourse (I am sooo weird).
By the strict definition of the word - maybe yes. But "slutty" has such a strong negative connotation to it - that I wouldn't use it except for someone who was being unfaithful.Looking for anonymous sex, feel-good no strings attached sex, (well maybe scarves...) without anything more, no expectations of being called for a date, or getting too personal. Does that sound really slutty?
I understand why people say some less than totally honest things to make others feel better about themselves (although I think sometimes that may be harmful in the long run) - being brutally honest can be very hurtful, and it is very important to be tactful - but I usually just can't tell an total untruth to someone just to make them feel better. In most cases I just keep my mouth shut rather than say something hurtful - honesty does not mean you have to point out every little flaw, or even the big ones. And what may seem to be a flaw to me is someone else's attraction - for the most part who am I to judge?luv2tvl69 said:Thank you for such honest and straightforward feedback and comment. its rare...![]()
Thanks. Sometimes I get into trouble when I am not tactful enough; I say something before I think about it, or I say the wrong thing without picking up the signals that someone is sensitive to something.I appreciate such candor.