Microinequities: Anyone you know?

BlackShanglan said:
Hmmm. I don't know. While I agree with you that this sort of talk often does arise in situations where there are other stressors, I'm not convinced that money is always at the bottom of it. Often, when people are snarling "They ain't payin' me enough to put up with this crap," it's the crap and not the pay that they would really like to see change. If some of it is about how they feel they are treated, it's as well to start there as anywhere. I'll agree that any "too much work / too few people" situation is inherently going to leave people stressed, angry, and irritable, and that that should be remedied - but treating them like humans in the field of manners is perhaps seen as encouragment that one might ultimately treat them like humans in terms of asking them to do a normal human quantity of work?

So much for fond hopes. :rolleyes: But then, I apparently have odd ideas of what constitutes pleasant manners. I was baffled to hear several colleagues describe our second-in-command as "charming" following a tense meeting in which he weaselled away from every direct question put to him and every direct answer requested. I can't quite comprehend how anyone could find such an untrustworthy and essentially dishonest person "charming." To me, being forthright (graced with tact) is part of having good manners.

Shanglan


I've sat in on a few to many "one minute manager" sessions. The newest fad psycological "reason" for bad morale and low productivity is always on the table.

Any suggestion along th elines that we could do a lot for morlae if we paid people more will get you at the least dirty looks. You're supposed to buy in to the new plan and be enthusiastic.

The best managers I ever had were blunt. They told me in no uncertain terms what was expected and by what criteria I would be judged. the worst were the weasly little bastard who tried to play psycological games with me. They usually got a rousing chorus of fuck you, I'm not that shallow or stupid.

When I managed a warehous briefly, I gave evryone a raise. And ya know what? I got high productivity and good morale. In my experience, people who say I don't get paid enough to deal with this crap will happily deal with it, if they feel their pay is comiserate with that crap they deal with. I had a very good loader, with a very bad attitude. Rather than fire him, I convinced my boss to give him a raise. When he foun dout he was being paid more than the other loaders, I got the good loader, mnus the attitude. He had a vailid gripe, he could load three trucks a day by himself. No other two man team could keep up with him. And he did it right.

He got all kinds of praise, little chaep plastic awards, the whole management gambit including special priveldges and being made "supervisor" of the dock. And his attitude got worse and worse. At base, he knew he did more in a day than ayone else on that dock. And when he was rewarded with a raise (I hasten to add it was only a .50 cent an hour raise) he was fine. Your average employee may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer, but they aren't stupid. Monetary reward is the best way to deal with them because it's the reason they are there. Very few people work because they love the job. They work to feed themselves, clothe themselves, and have money to have fun.

The biggest mistake corporationsm ake is ignroning that fundamental truth. All the management gimicks in the world have less positive effect than a raise. And in the end, the raise is usually more cost effective than the hours your highly paid managers spend in stupid metings and conferences talking about how to make them happy without giving them a raise.

I've been pper management, middlemanagement, lower management and craft. Sometimes all of the above with the same company over a span of time. There are hones principals of management that can make you get more out of people. In my expewrience they deal more with honesty, common courtesy and saying thank you and meaning it than they do with this kind of stuff.

I've always spoken my mind and I've always been up front. People respond to that.

I put this in the same category as all the other fad management techniques. Basic wastes of time and money that benmefit no one but the person who came up with it and managed to sell it to clueless CEO's.
 
rgraham666 said:
In a courtier based system, as ours more often is Shang, your second in command is going to be highly successful.

It is, as the article pointed out, a matter of morale. If your employees feel that you find them important enough to treat them well, their morale and productivity soars.

Unfortunately, this is a lot of work, and worse, morale can't be measured. In our society, things that can't be measured or marketed don't really exist.

So most managers prefer the NKVD approach, a lot of fear and occasional mass executions. Fear is an easily understood emotion, and body counts can be measured. :devil:


Fear is a great motivator, but it's a self defeating MO for long term operations.
 
rgraham666 said:
The biggest inequity is when people were redefined as human resources.

Ha - we do it one better in the consulting industry. We don't even call people resources. We call them FTE's, as in "Full Time Equivalents".


"Our proposal requires 20 FTE's for the first phase of the project, 30 FTEs in phase two, and 15 FTEs in phase three..."
 
rgraham666 said:
The biggest inequity is when people were redefined as human resources.
Resources is good. Last place I was employed at listed us as "debit units".

Guess why I quit?
 
LadyJeanne said:
Ha - we do it one better in the consulting industry. We don't even call people resources. We call them FTE's, as in "Full Time Equivalents".


"Our proposal requires 20 FTE's for the first phase of the project, 30 FTEs in phase two, and 15 FTEs in phase three..."

:eek:

Liar said:
Resources is good. Last place I was employed at listed us as "debit units".

Guess why I quit?

:eek: :eek:

And some people wonder why employees sometimes bring automatic weapons to work, and use them.

And Colleen? In the modern business world there is no long term MO. Next quarter, next year at most is the best the large percentage of modern management is capable of.

"Pump up your stock options, take the money and run" is how many of them think.

There's that damn sound again. It sounds like people knitting.
 
rgraham666 said:
:eek:



:eek: :eek:

And some people wonder why employees sometimes bring automatic weapons to work, and use them.

And Colleen? In the modern business world there is no long term MO. Next quarter, next year at most is the best the large percentage of modern management is capable of.

"Pump up your stock options, take the money and run" is how many of them think.

There's that damn sound again. It sounds like people knitting.


That may be true of the upper reaches, but it isn't of line management. I've ben Darth Vader. I've had the power to crush people like bugs. I used it sapringly, but it only had to be used once or twice and the entire region knew who I was and feared me. And that, alng with me sincerely wanting to help, motivated some impressive results.

I've been a line manager too, and at that level, the fear is corrosive. It wrecks just about everything except reams of CYA stuff from people.

I haven't worked for toomany companies where the fear motivation was primary. Even when it was, it generally only extended downward to middlemanagement. Below that, the employee's usually don't have enough to loose to make it work.
 
microinequities? what about macroeninquites? I feel pressured (read bullied) by someone at work all the time - and it ain't nice.
 
Liar said:
Resources is good. Last place I was employed at listed us as "debit units".

Guess why I quit?

I believe that I am technically a "salary line."

I've never realized the humiliation of that until this moment.

Shanglan
 
BlackShanglan said:
I believe that I am technically a "salary line."

I've never realized the humiliation of that until this moment.

Shanglan


In the state of NY, you are a line number. Every position has line numbers attached to them. every line number has so much money allocated to it. So if you're needed, you might hold five or six line numbers during a work year.
 
Goldie Munro said:
microinequities? what about macroeninquites? I feel pressured (read bullied) by someone at work all the time - and it ain't nice.

Can't you bully them back? It's fun!
 
Back
Top