Multiple male orgasms

[Voboy]

The "dry orgasm" thing has happened to me several times, both "flying solo" and "with a copilot."

I've got no idea how unusual or abnormal it is; the second orgasm (the "wet" edition) is always extremely intense.

 

[EmilyMiller]

I've got no idea how unusual or abnormal it is; the second orgasm (the "wet" edition) is always extremely intense.

That’s what it was like with the guy I mention. He was, like, overwhelmed or something. I mean I’ve had very few complaints over the years, but this was another level.

 

[Voboy]

That’s what it was like with the guy I mention. He was, like, overwhelmed or something. I mean I’ve had very few complaints over the years, but this was another level.

To be fair, even run-of-the-mill ejaculations are not all created equal. But it was more powerful than a normal ejaculation, yet less powerful than an ejaculation with a finger up the bum.

Not sure quite what the doctrinal term for that is, on whatever sexual Richter scale anyone here might be using. Lol.

 

[EmilyMiller]

sexual Richter scale anyone here might be using.

The Splatter Scale?

 

[Voboy]

The Splatter Scale?

The Rope Rating?

The Load Level?

 

[Vitriolhack]

Getting forgetful in my old age.

Also another guy who stayed erect after CIM and went straight to PIV.

FWIW all of the guys were at least thirty.

All I can say is that, you have had some fine men taking good care of you.

0 refraction is rare in men, especially over 30.

Younger, we are talking early 20s, many orgasms during the night was possible. 5 being the most I was able to provide, AGAIN I was 22 or so. Oh my, to be young and in university again!

These days I find that, edging, then holding the orgasm back several times will make you leak, but never crossing the orgasm rubicon. You can then keep masturbating or fucking or receiving a blowjob (providing your partner is adept at recognizing your edges) again and reach a much higher plateau. I find that, the second orgasm, if timed properly, usually makes me tremble all over my body!

Is it multi orgasm? Kinda, maybe?

 

[MillieDynamite]

@Vitriolhack I have three words for you, "Little Blue Pill"

 

[EmilyMiller]

All I can say is that, you have had some fine men taking good care of you.

Still do [just the one] I’m glad to say .

 

[old_prof]

I just remembered the perfect musical accompaniment to this discussion (The name of the album is Hard Again if you can't read it in he image.) I also like this era of Muddy Waters personally because a close friend played with him at a club in Boston several times the year this album came out.

 

[Vitriolhack]

Still do [just the one] I’m glad to say .

Ahhh, that is so sweet!

 

[Vitriolhack]

@Vitriolhack I have three words for you, "Little Blue Pill"

I have no shame in saying that I have tried it, the results are amazing!

 

[boytoyjoy]

Yeah I experienced that when I was younger. Probably couldn't manage it any more but who knows. I remember there was once a big weird article or web site about the topic. Web search didn't find it, but lol, found a science paper:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1743609521005749

"Exploring Male Multiple Orgasm in a Large Online Sample: Refining Our Understanding"

 

[Comshaw]

So I find myself confused on the whole "multiple orgasm" designation. If a person has multiple orgasmic peaks without any refractory time between, to my mind that isn't multiple orgasms but a continuous orgasm.

If the above is continuous and some kind of break between is necessary to establish them as multiple, how long a break is necessary? A minute? Two? Half an hour? And does that mean if a man orgasms, stays erect and continues with whatever sexual endeavor he is engaged in even though it takes time for him to begin to build back to another orgasm, when he does reach another, is that a multiple orgasm?

An explanation from WebMD is:
"A common definition of multiple orgasms is that the first orgasm ends and there is an explicit, short period when the person is not having an orgasm. Then, typically due to continued or renewed stimulation, another orgasm happens soon after."

As you can see they say there is an "explicit short period" between orgasms. But again, we're back to subjective terms, what does "short period" mean in this context?

I did a little research on male orgasms and it seems, according to some sites on the 'net, the record for male orgasms is 31 in a day. Is that considered multiple orgasms? And if not why not?

I am sooooo confused!

Comshaw

 

[Comshaw]

Yeah I experienced that when I was younger. Probably couldn't manage it any more but who knows. I remember there was once a big weird article or web site about the topic. Web search didn't find it, but lol, found a science paper:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1743609521005749

"Exploring Male Multiple Orgasm in a Large Online Sample: Refining Our Understanding"

I took a look at that site. While I am always leery of self-reported data in a study (because there is no way to prove it to be accurate) it does reinforce my confusion with this:

"While the range of reported orgasms varied from 2 to 30, the majority (79.5%, N = 97) of participants experienced between 2 and 4 orgasms separated by a specific time interval during which further stimulation was required to achieve another orgasm."

A minute? Two? Ten? FFS

Edited to add: It appears that each individual gets to designate what the time interval between orgasms is. I had sex with the wife then had sex the next day with my girlfriend so I declare those to be multiple orgasms.
Comshaw