No position in the culture war is leftist

Nothing is leftist unless its success would threaten the wealth and power of the rich. It has nothing to do with DEI. You can tell, because DEI is acceptable to the CEOs. They're indifferent to culture-war shit because neither side is a threat to them.
That’s nonsense. The culture war exists because leftist positions captured institutions and then pretended they were just “neutral progress.” When one side controls education, media, HR, entertainment, and bureaucracy, its positions stop being labeled “leftist” and start being marketed as reality itself. But intelligent people know the difference.
 
That’s nonsense. The culture war exists because leftist positions captured institutions and then pretended they were just “neutral progress.” When one side controls education, media, HR, entertainment, and bureaucracy, its positions stop being labeled “leftist” and start being marketed as reality itself. But intelligent people know the difference.
How can racial integration be anything other than "neutral progress"?

How can putting an end to school prayer, or putting an end to a ban on teaching evolution in school, be anything other than "neutral progress"?

We're talking Romanticism vs. Enlightenment here -- https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/RomanticismVersusEnlightenment -- and in that contest, Team Enlightenment is ALWAYS right. That's why "Star Trek" is better than "Star Wars."

[at this point a fan war ensues, spawning 50 threads in 10 different Lit fora]
 
The left has alway been willing to throw women and minorities under the bus for Marxism. If you won’t fight for us why should we fight for you?
China is the only Communist regime with a record of actually persecuting minorities (the plight of Jews in the USSR never quite rose to that level), and leftists, if sometimes falling short, have at any rate always been more consistently feminist than anybody else.
 
The point is, economic equality is what matters more than anything else, and we should never allow culture-war issues to distract us from that -- because economic equality is also the fight where we will encounter the most fierce and stubborn and powerful opposition.
This bears repeating, because this is what it's all about.
 
Last edited:
China is the only Communist regime with a record of actually persecuting minorities (the plight of Jews in the USSR never quite rose to that level), and leftists, if sometimes falling short, have at any rate always been more consistently feminist than anybody else.
Why didn’t the left turn up last year to vote for the black woman running against the white man?
 
Anarchism, practical or not, is a leftist movement closely associated with Marxism.

I understand that both Marxist and Anarchist are self contradicting idiots.

Anarchists oppose the state as a GUARDIAN of private property -- and of course it can be either depending on circumstances.

Another attempt to redefine "anarchism" to suit the lie.

But it never has used a socialist economic system.

Only if you ignore the definition of socialism and try to pretend "Marxist class struggle" is socialism. That is incorrect.
 
Why didn’t the left turn up last year to vote for the black woman running against the white man?
I love how it's always the skin color, not the horrible campagin of racism and hate against the very people she needed support from.........can't ever be THAT!!!

I love how you've so totally convinced yourself of the rightiousness of your racism that it's no longer racist when YOUUUU do it. LOL are you also IL74 by chance?? :ROFLMAO:
 
How can racial integration be anything other than "neutral progress"?

How can putting an end to school prayer, or putting an end to a ban on teaching evolution in school, be anything other than "neutral progress"?

We're talking Romanticism vs. Enlightenment here -- https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/RomanticismVersusEnlightenment -- and in that contest, Team Enlightenment is ALWAYS right. That's why "Star Trek" is better than "Star Wars."

[at this point a fan war ensues, spawning 50 threads in 10 different Lit fora]
No, you're talking bullshit, we're talking reality. That is the primary difference between you and reality.
 
I love how it's always the skin color, not the horrible campagin of racism and hate against the very people she needed support from.........can't ever be THAT!!!

I love how you've so totally convinced yourself of the rightiousness of your racism that it's no longer racist when YOUUUU do it. LOL are you also IL74 by chance?? :ROFLMAO:
Kamala Harris was clearly the superior candidate. Petulantly withholding your support because she didn’t pander directly to you was ludicrous.
 
Kamala Harris was clearly the superior candidate.

Only to the "orange man bad" crowd who loves to hate whitee.

Petulantly withholding your support because she didn’t pander directly to you was ludicrous.

Didn't pander to me directly??

LOL that's a charitable way to church up blatant naked racism and sexism.

The overt and in your face kind of sexism and racism you'd lose your fucking mind over if Trump said it about women or Jews.

Can you imagine Trump campaigning on that???

"Listen stop being such a bunch of greedy small hat whooorez and NIGGERZ!!!! ......be a little less Jewey, a little less niggery.... just vote for me and then get the fuck back in the kitchen will ya??? You're a breeding unit that cooks and cleans, do your job!! " .......

Then I could tell you that not voting for him because he didn't pander to you directly was ludicrous.

That's literally how fucking insane you are. :D
 
Only to the "orange man bad" crowd who loves to hate whitee.



Didn't pander to me directly??

LOL that's a charitable way to church up blatant naked racism and sexism you'd lose your fucking mind over if Trump said it about women or Jews, then you'd go vote for the jihadi that wants to exterminate jews and subjugate women like property :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: BECAUSE THEY GOT A FUCKIN' (D) NEXT TO THEIR NAME!!!
Your "liberals hate white men" schtick is never anything but dishonest mendacious strawmanning. Drop it once and for all.
 
The far left stayed home last year rather than vote for a black woman against a white male fascist.
LOL.....the idea that Kamala was a TERRIBLE..... TERRIBLE candidate is still breaking your poor little brain over a year later.

Sad.

I'll pray for you.
 
LOL.....the idea that Kamala was a TERRIBLE..... TERRIBLE candidate is still breaking your poor little brain over a year later.

Sad.

I'll pray for you.
She's a whole lot SMARTER than Trump, not even you can deny that.

But then, so is Hillary.

This does not reflect well on the voters.
 
How can racial integration be anything other than "neutral progress"?

How can putting an end to school prayer, or putting an end to a ban on teaching evolution in school, be anything other than "neutral progress"?

We're talking Romanticism vs. Enlightenment here -- https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/RomanticismVersusEnlightenment -- and in that contest, Team Enlightenment is ALWAYS right. That's why "Star Trek" is better than "Star Wars."

[at this point a fan war ensues, spawning 50 threads in 10 different Lit fora]
Yes, ideas just materialize spontaneously, fully formed, with no ideological lineage. Very mystical. Very convenient. Saying “no position is leftist” is your way to smuggle ideology in while pretending it’s neutral.
 
Back
Top