NYC Protests

I dare you to create either a Thread or a Post of your own.

Did you always hide behind others? Is this a Chink thing, you know what they say, how Asian males are kind of weasley and girly and paaassssive?

I've never seen you stand up on your own. You're completely dependent and passive.

You're kind of like a little parasite or amoeba. A yellow, cowardly parasite.

Nobody is upset and angry about any protest.....the protesters that are going to go out and freeze their ass's off to throw a temper tantrum over their loss are the most upset and angry.

Clearly.

Winning through anything doesn't matter as it was (D) loss that is causing the protests.

Further more the protests only serve to help Trump in 2020, so by all means.....carry on. :D
 
Of course they pay taxes

Not a single one of them cuts a check every spring.

A race to the bottom is no solution.

Allowing people to work isn't a race to the bottom.

Prohibiting their work is.

Whatever. They do file returns. You could make a case that individuals "really" pay the corporate taxes, but that is in no way relevant.

It's relevant because it disproportionately fucks the poor/working class.

It never helped before, why now?

Are you saying the poor are better off because you fuck them out of more money?

Seriously.....make that argument, I'd love to see you try.

it works perfectly as intended, it makes the rich richer,

Not anywhere as well as taking it from the poor via force and handing it to the rich like (D) LOVE doing. ACA anyone??? ;)

Your beloved (D) scams have made the rich richer than they have EVER been. :D

And for all their talk your lot hasn't taken them to task since FDR!!

Corporate M'uricuh popped Kennedy a fresh one and (D)'s sold the fuck out to get that campaign money, get that house at Martha's Vineyard.....that's how they end up being worth millions of dollars after working an 180k/yr salary for a couple years.

(D)'s are different from (R)'s in rhetoric only. Corporatist is their true name and market mongering is their real game, but as far as anyone under that level is concerned it's good ol' fashioned socialism. The only functional difference is corporations are calling the shots instead of bureaucrats.
 
Last edited:
I dare you to create either a Thread or a Post of your own.

Did you always hide behind others? Is this a Chink thing, you know what they say, how Asian males are kind of weasley and girly and paaassssive?

I've never seen you stand up on your own. You're completely dependent and passive.

You're kind of like a little parasite or amoeba. A yellow, cowardly parasite.

Said the racist commie....LOL
 
Not a single one of them cuts a check every spring.

That is both false and irrelevant.

Allowing people to work isn't a race to the bottom.

But cutting wages and benefits to compete with Third World labor markets is.

It's relevant because it disproportionately fucks the poor/working class.

So double the income tax on the 1%. Problem solved.

Are you saying the poor are better off because you fuck them out of more money?

No, I'm saying everyone is better off when taxes are high on the rich, low to nonexistent on the poor, and reasonable on the middle.
 
That is both false and irrelevant.

It's not false, people without SSN/TID#'s can't send the IRS bricks of cash with an "IOU" attached to it.

And it's relevant because this is a country, not a global fuckin' charity free for all.

But cutting wages and benefits to compete with Third World labor markets is.

Millions out of work and homeless is so much better, you're right how did I not see that wonderful benefit of you prohibiting their employment.

So double the income tax on the 1%. Problem solved.

Tell the (D)'s that always talk about it but wouldn't ever fuckin' DARE to do such a thing.

No, I'm saying everyone is better off when taxes are high on the rich, low to nonexistent on the poor, and reasonable on the middle.

But you support oligarchical democrats like they are living fuckin' saints. :rolleyes:

I don't think it is, I think it's better when you let the poor/middle class work and you limit the rich's ability to muscle them out of the opportunity for the poor/middle class to improve their standing in life.
 
Last edited:
It's not false, people without SSN/TID#'s can't send the IRS bricks of cash with an "IOU" attached to it.

And it's relevant because this is a country, not a global fuckin' charity....

It is false and irrelevant because immigrants do pay taxes one way or another, and many if not most of them pay federal income tax. They even pay Social Security payroll tax without qualifying for SS benefits. No, kicking them all out would not be good for America.

Immigrants pay property taxes either via home ownership or rental, as well as sales tax when purchasing goods in the U.S. Depending on their employers, the immigrants also pay federal, state, and local income taxes. Analysts told VICE News the population will contribute at least $12 billion to the federal government in 2015, and at least $10.6 billion to state and local governments via income and payroll taxes.[2] Undocumented workers pay their part despite the fact that they are explicitly banned from taxpayer-funded programs such as Social Security, Medicare, welfare, and food stamps. Undocumented immigrants contributed about $12 billion to the Social Security Trust Fund in 2010, according to the Social Security Administration.[3] Since illegal immigrants cannot legally be employed, they are often employed "off the books" in casual or seasonal work and are paid in cash, without taxes deducted and often below minimum wage. Employers often threaten to report immigrant workers to Immigration and Customs Enforcement if the worker complains about wages or working conditions.[4]
Since illegal immigrants often have fake or stolen documents (especially Social Security numbers), they often cannot benefit from Social Security taxes withheld from wages. The amount in question is evidenced by the Social Security Administration’s “suspense file” (taxes that cannot be matched to workers’ names and Social Security numbers), which grew $20 billion between 1990 and 1998.[5][6]

But you support oligarchical democrats like they are living fuckin' saints. :rolleyes:

I never called them that, and anyway it's not a dichotomy. Hillary Clinton is not a saint, but she's not a bad person either. I voted for Sanders in the primary myself, and then I voted for Hillary without having to hold my nose even a little. Sure she's in Goldman Sachs' pocket, but, you know, lesser evil. Some Dems are crooked, but you have to pick from what's on the ballot, and I have never in my lifetime witnessed an American election where the Democrat, however vile, was not both a better choice and a better person than the Republican, and neither have you.
 
Last edited:
How can less illegal aliens...
A stronger military...
More companies staying in America...
Cutting personal and corporate taxes...

Be bad for America?

Taxes are what fund governments. Typically cutting taxes results in an increasing deficit. Trade tariffs probably won't off set the difference and will slow down trade which will further decrease government income.

Some savings can be had by slashing services. But reversal of the welfare state will include such things as old age pensions and Medicare. As well as general welfare.

Cuts to the military can net quite a few billion dollars. And if involvement in foreign affairs is planned then a huge standing army that police the world will not be needed. But this would be very unpopular with his voter base and the industrial/military complex. Many defence contractors are US based and job losses will occur.

Companies staying in America pay higher labour costs. This results in lower profits for stakeholders like mutual funds. Lower profits also means lower taxable income.

Infrastructure projects are short term fixes. Admittedly many municipalities do suffer from aging infrastructure. But will not stimulate long term growth.

Why have a strong military if you befriend Russia and can already beat anyone else in the world. Nuclear deterrent will keep rogue states inline.

Isolationist and protectionist policies do not work well. America was heavily both during the Great Depression. It took WW II to break out of that depression.

The rest of the world will either continue to develop and get ahead of the US. Or fall apart and then the US is alone. Think Russia is your friend for life now? Better for them to ally with a continental competitor and split the world between them.

Globalization and free trade are here to stay. Waving an orange finger at them will not make them go away. Even if that was a good idea.
 
It is false and irrelevant because immigrants do pay taxes one way or another, and many if not most of them pay federal income tax. They even pay Social Security payroll tax without qualifying for SS benefits. No, kicking them all out would not be good for America.

It's not false or irrelevant.

They might pay some taxes but they do not pay taxes like the full citizen does. I don't care what your globalist bullshit propaganda pages.

I'm a farmer in California bro, I SEE IT HAPPEN all the time.

So either change the law to get these people registered and paying their fair share, or get them the fuck out.

And as far as the relevance of it, you're simply in denial about what is happening and why. If it weren't relevant Trump wouldn't be in office.

I never called them that, and anyway it's not a dichotomy. Hillary Clinton is not a saint, but she's not a bad person either. I voted for Sanders in the primary myself, and then I voted for Hillary without having to hold my nose even a little. Sure she's in Goldman Sachs' pocket, but, you know, lesser evil.

You act like they are.

She's a horrible person and was in no way shape or form the lesser of two evils.

Just the less likable one, unless of course your a ride or die no matter what (D) like yourself. Then she's not a bad person at all and totally deserved to skate on breaking laws we regularly trash peoples lives for right?

LOL the smug elitist assholery supporting and surrounding that woman made her one of the least like candidates of all time. Pleas keep it up, I'd hate to see (D)'s make any progress anytime soon. I'm hoping these Trump protest result in some dead white people....*keeping fingers crossed*:D

Some Dems are crooked, but you have to pick from what's on the ballot, and I have never in my lifetime witnessed an American election where the Democrat, however vile, was not both a better choice and a better person than the Republican, and neither have you.

Sure I have, both Bushes were better than any of the fuckers they ran against and Trump was better than Clinton by the very narrow margin that he's a little more likable than she is.

Oh and Romney > Obummer.....his version of ACA was better.

Globalization and free trade are here to stay. Waving an orange finger at them will not make them go away. Even if that was a good idea.

Free trade maybe, but not Globalism, people are getting over that shit way faster than you globalist shit heads can force it. :)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top