Wrong Element
Sentient Onion
- Joined
- May 5, 2002
- Posts
- 24,909
I love how Vette uses the ominous phrase "mandatory law" as if that's somehow worse than a law that you can obey only if you kinda feel like it.
That was obvious to anyone who read what Obama said. It wasn't as obvious if all you read was the news stories about the comments -- another sterling moment for American journalism.
I'm not sure I'd be in favor of such a law, and since it will literally never come to pass -- keep in mind that everyone in elective office now won their seats via non-mandatory voting -- it's not worth much effort to think about. But what is it about the idea of everyone voting, or even encouraging people to vote, that gets so many people upset?
The "we the people" constitutional conservative types don't seem terribly interested in what "the people" think, which is why the first thing the Tea Party does when it wins power anywhere is make it harder to vote.
The opinion of the framers is important, but it hasn't stopped the Constitution from being amended a whole lotta times.
Also, you refer to "the right to vote." As Scalia gloated during the arguments over Florida in 2000, there is no such thing.
Obama never proposed a mandatory voting law. Obama never even proposed mandatory voting. Obama said it would be a good idea if everybody voted, that is all. He said nothing about making it mandatory.
That was obvious to anyone who read what Obama said. It wasn't as obvious if all you read was the news stories about the comments -- another sterling moment for American journalism.
I'm not sure I'd be in favor of such a law, and since it will literally never come to pass -- keep in mind that everyone in elective office now won their seats via non-mandatory voting -- it's not worth much effort to think about. But what is it about the idea of everyone voting, or even encouraging people to vote, that gets so many people upset?
The "we the people" constitutional conservative types don't seem terribly interested in what "the people" think, which is why the first thing the Tea Party does when it wins power anywhere is make it harder to vote.
My argument is, the founders never contemplated compulsory voting, neither does the Constitution as written. The right to vote, a form of speech, implies a right not to vote, as remaining silent can be a statement in itself. I'm sorry you're so invested in bigger government and tyranny, so ready to have your liberty dictated to you. Pray that those who do will always be on your side.
The opinion of the framers is important, but it hasn't stopped the Constitution from being amended a whole lotta times.
Also, you refer to "the right to vote." As Scalia gloated during the arguments over Florida in 2000, there is no such thing.
