They're making it impossible for another Republican to win the WH any time prior to . . . No, not 2032, voters will still remember Trump then . . .More than any other, look how much damage they are doing to your team....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They're making it impossible for another Republican to win the WH any time prior to . . . No, not 2032, voters will still remember Trump then . . .More than any other, look how much damage they are doing to your team....
They're making it impossible for another Republican to win the WH any time prior to . . . No, not 2032, voters will still remember Trump then . . .
Sanders and AOC and Mamdani ain't.Right now the left is the only one rebeling against democracy.
But his second term is already a whole lot WORSE!That's what you guys said during his FIRST term.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/12/23/supreme-court-chicago-illinois-troops-trump/The Supreme Court said Tuesday that it would not allow President Donald Trump to deploy the National Guard in the Chicago area for now, a significant setback for his campaign to push troops into cities across the country over the objections of local and state leaders.
The Supreme Court has rebuffed President Donald Trump’s attempt to deploy National Guard troops in Illinois to protect federal officials carrying out his mass-deportation policy.
In their ruling Tuesday, the justices noted that federal law generally bars use of the military for law enforcement, and they declared that the law Trump used to activate the Guard is likely to only apply when regular armed forces — the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines — are insufficient to maintain order.
“At this preliminary stage, the Government has failed to identify a source of authority that would allow the military to execute the laws in Illinois,” the high court said in an unsigned order released more than two months after the administration asked the justices to weigh in.
Three conservative justices — Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch — dissented, while another conservative, Brett Kavanaugh, declined to join the majority’s explanation of the ruling.
Not if it ends differently from the Spanish one.this is gonna be bad
Not if it ends differently from the Spanish one.
That one ended in the best possible way under the circumstances.what about the one between north and south
That one ended in the best possible way under the circumstances.
Lotta people said that in the 1960s, but it was an illusion.It's already going on.
One reason for that is that the New Leftists had no actual revolutionary agenda, nothing they clearly wanted to put in place of the status quo.Lotta people said that in the 1960s, but it was an illusion.
There are NONE of those on the RW side any more, none at all. You won't see them at any MAGA rally or RNC.it’ll be ordinary, patriotic Americans
Oh, well, if we have to do it that way, whom shall we ethnically cleanse? I say the Mormons.Yugoslavia has entered the chat.
Betting pool, then.Yeah, civil war. Coming soon. Inevitable.
(yawn)
So —is it, or is it not?Everybody seems to think it would be a war with only two sides -- RW rebels vs. the Government,
But left-wing rebels are also a possibility.
Now I'm starting to think I might actually live to see a civil war happen.
It's already going on.
There's no clear geographical fault line. The present political division in America is not between states, it is within states -- between traditionalist rural areas and cosmopolitan metro areas.a civil war 2 would definley split usa into many different countries
There's no clear geographical fault line. The present political division in America is not between states, it is within states -- between traditionalist rural areas and cosmopolitan metro areas.