One Wonders How This Will Fly

Perhaps Obama is fed up with coddling the RW and has decided to use the power of his office to force the RW to STFU!

If he withheld Highway funds from Kentucky and Texas and made them beg for the Big Governments money, he could make their constituents rethink their Teahadist positions.

I have been surprised that Obama hasn't fucked with the RW as hard as they have tried to fuck him. Perhaps in his Lame Duck period when Congress is passing nothing anyway is when he's decided to fuck all over these pricks?
 
Choose the one the oranges come from! Oh . . . wait . . .

FL does 60 somethin' % of the US's citrus so...but CA has pretty much all your other food. So.....

Then why does it require new "guidelines" then, Mr. Apology?

LOL because it's a new yea high speed...jesus fuckin' christ....

New guidelines for qualification for federal disaster preparedness moneys come out regularly, Mr. Moron.

The requirement that states comply with these or foot the bill for their own insufficient preparation measures is nothing new. Nor is the fact that FEMA has the final say on which projects qualify for federal grant money for implementation.

Go ahead, refuse to comply and wonder why FEMA won't give you money to piss away on poor planning.

http://media.giphy.com/media/Pn92xK1AC4l2M/giphy.gif

Perhaps in his Lame Duck period when Congress is passing nothing anyway is when he's decided to fuck all over these pricks?

One can only hope....the hypocritical bullshit rhetoric on the right is
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/0/06/Spinal_Tap_-_Up_to_Eleven.jpg

And could stand to be turned down a notch.....
 
You just gotta love it when retired conservatives and so called working liberals
argue on the internet all day.

I figure the all day lit liberals are stealing time from the companies they
work for. But they sure do get pissed off at the retired people around here.
Maybe if they didn't steal so much time they may be able to retire one day.
 
You just gotta love it when government parasite conservatives and hard working liberals
argue on the internet all day.

I don't like lit liberals so I accuse them of all sorts of shit. Maybe someday I will have a job, especially since unemployment is low due to President Obama's leadership, but I doubt it. I have no skills.

Derp.
 
You just gotta love it when retired conservatives and so called working liberals
argue on the internet all day.

I figure the all day lit liberals are stealing time from the companies they
work for. But they sure do get pissed off at the retired people around here.
Maybe if they didn't steal so much time they may be able to retire one day.

What about the ones who own companies and get paid to pretty much hold paperwork, while their minions make money for them? :confused:
 
You just gotta love it when retired conservatives and so called working liberals
argue on the internet all day.

I figure the all day lit liberals are stealing time from the companies they
work for. But they sure do get pissed off at the retired people around here.
Maybe if they didn't steal so much time they may be able to retire one day.

Oh, but Dubby. :D

We don't really give a fuck about what you scratch your dandruffy scalp over trying to figure out while sitting at home being useless and burning your remaining lifespan derping on the internet. Honestly, we don't. ;)

I don't know why it even matters to you. Because by the time we retire, your shitstain ass will either be saliva-gasping on a hospital bed with several tubes coming out of different entry and exit points of your body trying to maintain your mortal coil of existence, OR six feet under topsoil. Both of which conditions will have been completely subsidized by us taxpaying liberals. To the fawning delight of your surviving family members who will no doubt be trying to figure out how to divvy up the pies you left behind, if any have more value than a cheese pizza from Papa John's.

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lsue18jXqk1qkixw6.gif

http://media.tumblr.com/d3173f006b6b78bff860577a0417258b/tumblr_inline_nlonf5dMft1rna76x.gif
 
Oh, but Dubby. :D

We don't really give a fuck about what you scratch your dandruffy scalp over trying to figure out while sitting at home being useless and burning your remaining lifespan derping on the internet. Honestly, we don't. ;)

I don't know why it even matters to you. Because by the time we retire, your shitstain ass will either be saliva-gasping on a hospital bed with several tubes coming out of different entry and exit points of your body trying to maintain your mortal coil of existence, OR six feet under topsoil. Both of which conditions will have been completely subsidized by us taxpaying liberals. To the fawning delight of your surviving family members who will no doubt be trying to figure out how to divvy up the pies you left behind, if any have more value than a cheese pizza from Papa John's.

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lsue18jXqk1qkixw6.gif

http://media.tumblr.com/d3173f006b6b78bff860577a0417258b/tumblr_inline_nlonf5dMft1rna76x.gif

Yawn, where is the verity? Are you feeling pressed?
 
You have me wondering Rob, do you believe people who retire on Social Security are parasites?

I truly love those government sponges who continually lecture us on teh "dignity of work", when most of 'em haven't held a job in this millenium or rely upon their wives to be the primary breadwinner.

Tell us, are you employed?
 
There is actually an interesting public policy question at stake here: Should the federal government be coercive in manding the State's behaviour to receive funding?

To use a less politically charged example, there is no national drinking age it is determined by the States. However if you want to receive funding for your state from the Department of Transportation, your state has to have its drinking age set at 21. This is just one example of many.

So there is precedent and this is a reasonably common practice. I'm not sure it is reasonable, but there you have it.
 
There is actually an interesting public policy question at stake here: Should the federal government be coercive in manding the State's behaviour to receive funding?

To use a less politically charged example, there is no national drinking age it is determined by the States. However if you want to receive funding for your state from the Department of Transportation, your state has to have its drinking age set at 21. This is just one example of many.

So there is precedent and this is a reasonably common practice. I'm not sure it is reasonable, but there you have it.

I think it is....you have to set standards/bars/lines etc. and the states either get with the program, or they don't. No different than they treat people, you want x benefits? You have to be/do/participate in/carry/own Y, Z and or Q.

Otherwise bachelors would get WIC....:rolleyes:

And this one is really ridiculous...they are turning down funding for emergency prep over a point of being dumber than fuck for the sake of partisan political pride.

So if they want to be big ol dips of shit? Fuck em, more for the rest of us...call their fucking bluff and get em' fired. ;)
 
Last edited:
Shouldn't there be a vote on making the drinking age 21 that gets through both chambers and is signed into law?
 
You just gotta love it when retired conservatives and so called working liberals
argue on the internet all day.

I figure the all day lit liberals are stealing time from the companies they
work for. But they sure do get pissed off at the retired people around here.
Maybe if they didn't steal so much time they may be able to retire one day.

A post like that makes private businesses look bad.
 
You just gotta love it when retired conservatives and so called working liberals
argue on the internet all day.

I figure the all day lit liberals are stealing time from the companies they
work for. But they sure do get pissed off at the retired people around here.
Maybe if they didn't steal so much time they may be able to retire one day.
A full time job usually means five 8-hour shifts every week. An 8-hour shift is usually broken up into four segments of 1.9 hours each, with rests (on the clock) and meals in between. So a person with a full-time job only needs to work 38 hours a week.

If a person sleeps eight hours a day, in a week that's 56 hours. So with 168 total hours in a week, and 94 hours at work or asleep, that leaves 74 hours a week, or over ten and a half hours a day remaining for posting on Lit.
 
A full time job usually means five 8-hour shifts every week. An 8-hour shift is usually broken up into four segments of 1.9 hours each, with rests (on the clock) and meals in between. So a person with a full-time job only needs to work 38 hours a week.

If a person sleeps eight hours a day, in a week that's 56 hours. So with 168 total hours in a week, and 94 hours at work or asleep, that leaves 74 hours a week, or over ten and a half hours a day remaining for posting on Lit.

When one doesn't have a job, one doesn't know these things.
 
I truly love those government sponges who continually lecture us on teh "dignity of work", when most of 'em haven't held a job in this millenium or rely upon their wives to be the primary breadwinner.

Tell us, are you employed?

Yes, I'm self employed working long hours.

I guess you also love government sponges who have never worked.

Gotta go to work now, I'm on EST.
 
I figure the all day lit liberals are stealing time from the companies they
work for. But they sure do get pissed off at the retired people around here.
Maybe if they didn't steal so much time they may be able to retire one day.

You're assuming they really have a job. Throb has been doing that for years. He does arts and crafts all day. Would you hire him?
 
Back
Top