OPENLY RACIST AND HOMOPHOBIC LANGUAGE - Is this really allowed here????

The danger of putting joke bigots like Archie Bunker and Eric Cartman on TV is that some dim bulbs don’t get the joke and start emulating them.
They wrote the Archie character to be a dinosaur about to become extinct in 1971 for crissakes.

It might have been funny at the time when everyone knew an Archie Bunker in their family. But it was always satire. And most intelligent people understood that.
 
Racist and homophobic language is not permitted. Only a faggot paki would think that it would be acceptable.
 
They wrote the Archie character to be a dinosaur about to become extinct in 1971 for crissakes.

It might have been funny at the time when everyone knew an Archie Bunker in their family. But it was always satire. And most intelligent people understood that.
The problem is all the stupid people who take satirical bigots as role models.
 
Soo many nominal Trump supporters...even some of the red-hat haters...are quietly distancing themselves from the Gnome/Trump/Patel "alternate reality" where the shooter is teh victim and the dead guy is the evildoer. Eight separate camera angles will do that to you. They'll give lip service to "believe the Narrative, not what you see with your own lying eyes".

Trump's got less than three weeks left on Earth, according to psychics. Hospice workers have noted the "end stage" stare-into-the-distance slack jawed gaze of the President. Trump got up from a tense meeting with oil company CEOs at the Gold House yesterday because he wanted to look out the window at the snow falling...and stayed there at the window until his handlers were able to gently guide him back to his seat.

When Trump mercifully passes away in his sleep in February, we'll see a huge number of "Vee vere NEVFER MAGA! Nein!" revisionism of the sort not seen since the end of World War 2.

The Vettebigot will not be one of those, however. He's come out of the full-blown Fascist closet. He'll quickly morph into a hardcore Vance/Tech Bro supporter (even though he has no idea what crypto currency is!). He'll do his part to marginalize the attempts of the Christian Nationalists to install Ericka Kirk as Vice President or better yet JD Vance's next wife, because he knows what they will do to closeted homosexuals such as himself.
Wow. That’s quite the cinematic universe you’ve built there, fascists, tech bros, crypto, secret marriages, closeted villains, and a subplot involving some Vice President fan-fiction. All from a guy you don’t like on the internet. It’s impressive, honestly. No evidence, no facts, just vibes and a wildly overactive imagination that projects his own dark depravity onto others. If this politics thing doesn’t work out, you might want to pitch it to Netflix. Until then, maybe try engaging with what people actually say instead of auditioning for “Most Unhinged Take of the Day.”
 
You stupid cunt. You mean the gun that was pulled off him seconds before he was executed for exercising his Second Amendment right?

Do you even liberty bro?
You sound like an emotional girl, always ready to get up in everyone's face from afar.
 
You are the master of not being what you claim to be nor do your bleating posts/rhetoric have much behind them "except noise and hate." Pathetic hypocrite. I am still laughing...at you, every single time your childish retorts pop up on this screen.

<-- claims to be an Ass and nothing more. If you don't want to believe it, that's on you.
 
Wow. That’s quite the cinematic universe you’ve built there, fascists, tech bros, crypto, secret marriages, closeted villains, and a subplot involving some Vice President fan-fiction. All from a guy you don’t like on the internet. It’s impressive, honestly. No evidence, no facts, just vibes and a wildly overactive imagination that projects his own dark depravity onto others. If this politics thing doesn’t work out, you might want to pitch it to Netflix. Until then, maybe try engaging with what people actually say instead of auditioning for “Most Unhinged Take of the Day.”
the irony of bein' lectured on "no evidence" by a guy who swears that Alex Pretti "drew his gun first" and those 8 bystander videos are all AI hoaxes......
 
the irony of bein' lectured on "no evidence" by a guy who swears that Alex Pretti "drew his gun first" and those 8 bystander videos are all AI hoaxes......
I didn’t swear by it; I reported what was being reported at the time. The subsequent video makes it clear he was an unhinged lunatic. And as for your earlier comment about the “$25 misdemeanor,” the law is explicit: if he is not carrying his CCW permit on his person, his right to carry is suspended.
 
I didn’t swear by it; I reported what was being reported at the time. The subsequent video makes it clear he was an unhinged lunatic. And as for your earlier comment about the “$25 misdemeanor,” the law is explicit: if he is not carrying his CCW permit on his person, his right to carry is suspended.
"Explicit"?
"Suspended"?
Here is the entirety of Minnesota's concealed carry firearms law: LINK

It is only 24 short paragraphs long.

Not a single paragraph mentions "his right to carry is suspended" for failure to car a permit.

What does this tell us?

It tells us that fascists routinely lie through their teeth to advance their narrative.
 
"Explicit"?
"Suspended"?
Here is the entirety of Minnesota's concealed carry firearms law: LINK

It is only 24 short paragraphs long.

Not a single paragraph mentions "his right to carry is suspended" for failure to car a permit.

What does this tell us?

It tells us that fascists routinely lie through their teeth to advance their narrative.
You’re correct, the law does not explicitly say that, and I was wrong on that point. However, it can reasonably be argued that if an armed individual encounters a police officer in a public setting and is unable to produce any identification, including a permit to carry, especially when the fact that the individual is armed is not voluntarily disclosed and both the officer and the individual are already engaged in a violent physical confrontation, the officer may reasonably assume at that moment that the firearm is being carried unlawfully and respond accordingly based on officer-safety concerns and probable-cause considerations.
 
You’re correct, the law does not explicitly say that, and I was wrong on that point.
Thank you. Will there be an inevitable "However"?
However, it can reasonably be argued that if an armed individual encounters a police officer in a public setting and is unable to produce any identification, including a permit to carry, especially when the fact that the individual is armed is not voluntarily disclosed and both the officer and the individual are already engaged in a violent physical confrontation, the officer may reasonably assume at that moment that the firearm is being carried unlawfully and respond accordingly based on officer-safety concerns and probable-cause considerations.
Okay this is the worst possible situation.

Suppose you and your boyfriend are out peacefully protesting something and your boyfriend says something typically bitchy to a Gestapo Goon with a gun. The Gestapo Goon With a gun (abbreviated "GGG" going forward for brevity) decides to curtail your bf's first amendment rights by unleashing a torrent of pepper spray at your bf's face. You naturally and instinctively try to protect the man you love. The GGG has not place your or him under arrest or even announced you two are being detained.

Under Minnesota law, you are NOT required to announce you have a concealed weapon to a GGG unless specifically asked (I addressed this fiction yesterday). The GGG is simply beating the brakes off you and your life partner not because you've broken any laws, but he hates you two for exercising your First Amendment rights and he also hates fag couples, but that's beside the point now.

Suppose you followed your own advice and announced to the GGG mid-beating that you had a gun, how do you think the GGG would have reacted?

My guess is he would take that as a direct threat to his health and welfare, and that YOU had escalated the situation to the point where "summary field execution" was not only AUTHORIZED under the law but ENCOURAGED by government policy.
 
I use racist language all the time - at the request of the women I sext with. They are not white. Get over it.
 
You’re correct, the law does not explicitly say that, and I was wrong on that point. However, it can reasonably be argued that if an armed individual encounters a police officer in a public setting and is unable to produce any identification, including a permit to carry, especially when the fact that the individual is armed is not voluntarily disclosed and both the officer and the individual are already engaged in a violent physical confrontation, the officer may reasonably assume at that moment that the firearm is being carried unlawfully and respond accordingly based on officer-safety concerns and probable-cause considerations.
The agents who shot Alex Pretti never asked to see his permit or his ID. If they had and Pretti failed to produce them, he would have been subject to a $25 fine. Forfeiture of the weapon is not a penalty.

The agents failed to follow the law and killed an innocent man.
 
Thank you. Will there be an inevitable "However"?

Okay this is the worst possible situation.

Suppose you and your boyfriend are out peacefully protesting something and your boyfriend says something typically bitchy to a Gestapo Goon with a gun. The Gestapo Goon With a gun (abbreviated "GGG" going forward for brevity) decides to curtail your bf's first amendment rights by unleashing a torrent of pepper spray at your bf's face. You naturally and instinctively try to protect the man you love. The GGG has not place your or him under arrest or even announced you two are being detained.

Under Minnesota law, you are NOT required to announce you have a concealed weapon to a GGG unless specifically asked (I addressed this fiction yesterday). The GGG is simply beating the brakes off you and your life partner not because you've broken any laws, but he hates you two for exercising your First Amendment rights and he also hates fag couples, but that's beside the point now.

Suppose you followed your own advice and announced to the GGG mid-beating that you had a gun, how do you think the GGG would have reacted?

My guess is he would take that as a direct threat to his health and welfare, and that YOU had escalated the situation to the point where "summary field execution" was not only AUTHORIZED under the law but ENCOURAGED by government policy.
I don't have a boyfriend. You're the one fixated on faggotry. It's all you ever talk about. I'm normal with no such abnormality. I know you must yearn for like-minded gay company, but I'm not gay.
 
Public service announcement - Sexting should take place in a platform in which you can video so you can see the other person or at least talk on the phone. That way, you know the true sex of the other person. Sexting otherwise will end up chatting with trans like the guys on this site.
 
Public service announcement - Sexting should take place in a platform in which you can video so you can see the other person or at least talk on the phone. That way, you know the true sex of the other person. Sexting otherwise will end up chatting with trans like the guys on this site.
Says a guy on this site. :rolleyes:

You just outed yourself, ya homo.
 
<-- claims to be an Ass and nothing more. If you don't want to believe it, that's on you.
Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhh, Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhh
Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhh, Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhh,
Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhh, Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhh

More bleating from the pin headed little sheeple. I bet you spent hours coming up with that jewel.

I honestly do pity you. I am still here. I am still laughing...at you. Mensa is still not looking for you.
 
Last edited:
The opening in OMM's mind is about as wide as a piss ant.
Arpy's twin? Are you as gender confused as he is, or have you decided on one of the 98 genders available to identify as? He seems conflicted and doesn't know if he wants to wear a skirt or pants today. Maybe your barn stall is next to his and he can give you some pointers ---><---<------>...so many choices
 
Arpy's twin? Are you as gender confused as he is, or have you decided on one of the 98 genders available to identify as? He seems conflicted and doesn't know if he wants to wear a skirt or pants today. Maybe your barn stall is next to his and he can give you some pointers ---><---<------>...so many choices
There are only two genders. I dare you to travel to the Middle East and advocate for 98 genders in Gaza.
 
There are only two genders. I dare you to travel to the Middle East and advocate for 98 genders in Gaza.

Right wing whackadoodles (such as yourself) often use the terms “sex” and “gender” interchangeably, but this is incorrect. Sex refers to biological physical differences, while gender is how people identify.

“Sex” refers to the physical differences between people who are male, female, or intersex. A person typically has their sex assigned at birth based on physiological characteristics, including their genitalia and chromosome composition. This assigned sex is called a person’s “natal sex.”

Gender, on the other hand, involves how a person identifies. Unlike natal sex, gender is not made up of binary forms. Instead, gender is a broad spectrum. A person may identify at any point within this spectrum or outside of it entirely.

People may identify with genders that are different from their natal sex or with none at all. These identities may include transgender, nonbinary, ammosexual, homosexual or gender-neutral. There are many other ways in which a person may define their own gender.
Link

I hope this helps clear up your confusion, faggot.
 
Back
Top