Racial differences in penis size. Observations only from Gay men, preferably older, who have personally handled many penises in their life.

There really isn't a need for a larger sample size than that:
https://tools4dev.org/resources/how-to-choose-a-sample-size/#:~:text=Surveys where you plan to,useful, idea about their opinions.

Main point:
A good maximum sample size is usually around 10% of the population, as long as this does not exceed 1000. For example, in a population of 5000, 10% would be 500. In a population of 200,000, 10% would be 20,000. This exceeds 1000, so in this case the maximum would be 1000.

Even in a population of 200,000, sampling 1000 people will normally give a fairly accurate result. Sampling more than 1000 people won’t add much to the accuracy given the extra time and money it would cost.
The other thing to consider is that this is just going by length whereas true size would take circumference into account and be by volume.
The percentage increase in volume difference would be even more Dramatic as generally a longer penis is thicker as well, and shorter ones are thinner of course there are exceptions.
From that account even a 15% length difference could be a 30+% size difference when you take volume into account.
There is a site where you can actually put in your measurements and it gives you your penis volume automatically.
Kinda interesting.
 
I never expect to change the opinion of anyone online - that's almost impossible. I just post to provide a bit of a counterpoint and to give more neutral readers a chance to see some facts instead of only being presented with skewed anecdotes
OP actually asked for anecdotal evidence anyway, you were the one who wanted to throw in the supposed "facts" online.
So initially you said there is no difference, now you say there's minimal difference.
To say there's no difference would be just as false as saying there's a huge difference.
I personally enjoy a good-natured debate, so it's all good and fun.
 
I’m 5’7. Fit. Small hands and feet. Despite internet BS, there aren’t THAT many 8+ cocks around. Despite being small of stature, my 7.5x6c cock has been judged large—sometimes largest!—by nearly every person, male or female, I’ve been with. Height isn’t the tell. Also, men should stop pretending that 6” is “small”—in fact, well above average
I am very similar to you in size although not quite as thick.
First, most people especially partners, are going to tell you what you want to hear. Perhaps they were all honest.
Most of my partners have also said I'm among the biggest, but the truly honest ones who had some experience usually experienced 1 or 2 that were considerably larger.
Even if it is only 1 in 1000 that is 8 inches plus, That is still millions and millions of huge dicks out there.😄
I've only hung out with maybe 12 dicks and over half were likely bigger than you.
 
OP actually asked for anecdotal evidence anyway, you were the one who wanted to throw in the supposed "facts" online.
So initially you said there is no difference, now you say there's minimal difference.
To say there's no difference would be just as false as saying there's a huge difference.
I personally enjoy a good-natured debate, so it's all good and fun.
I haven't said anything of the kind - I've only quoted findings from reputable sources.
But you are right, the OP clearly wanted this thread as an echo chamber for his fantasies rather than a discussion of reality. I haven't played along with that and that isn't really fair.
I'll see myself out :)
 
I haven't said anything of the kind - I've only quoted findings from reputable sources.
But you are right, the OP clearly wanted this thread as an echo chamber for his fantasies rather than a discussion of reality. I haven't played along with that and that isn't really fair.
I'll see myself out :)
I question how reputable any sources on the internet about this topic are but point taken. I shall see myself out as well. 😊
 
I am very similar to you in size although not quite as thick.
First, most people especially partners, are going to tell you what you want to hear. Perhaps they were all honest.
Most of my partners have also said I'm among the biggest, but the truly honest ones who had some experience usually experienced 1 or 2 that were considerably larger.
Even if it is only 1 in 1000 that is 8 inches plus, That is still millions and millions of huge dicks out there.😄
I've only hung out with maybe 12 dicks and over half were likely bigger than you.
Fair enough. I have reason to believe those who have reported to me have done so honestly and sincerely. For example, I've been told I'm larger (at least) unprompted by literally dozens of people with a good deal of experience.

My wife (going on 30 years) has been with scores of men, and is not telling me what I (supposedly) want to hear. My junior-high gf (heavy petting was the extent) had no reason to seek me out as an adult, as a married woman, fly to LA, and have sex with me because, she said, she wanted to see if her memory about my size was correct.

I am *not* boasting. I'm more than thrilled that there are plenty of men bigger than I; in fact, I love that.

I'm just trying to provide more accurate information about average cock size, according not just to peer-reviewed data, but also personal experience.

Your sample size (a dozen) is small, but kudos for finding 50% big ones! That's a score.

Statistically, that's an anomaly.
 
Fair enough. I have reason to believe those who have reported to me have done so honestly and sincerely. For example, I've been told I'm larger (at least) unprompted by literally dozens of people with a good deal of experience.

My wife (going on 30 years) has been with scores of men, and is not telling me what I (supposedly) want to hear. My junior-high gf (heavy petting was the extent) had no reason to seek me out as an adult, as a married woman, fly to LA, and have sex with me because, she said, she wanted to see if her memory about my size was correct.

I am *not* boasting. I'm more than thrilled that there are plenty of men bigger than I; in fact, I love that.

I'm just trying to provide more accurate information about average cock size, according not just to peer-reviewed data, but also personal experience.

Your sample size (a dozen) is small, but kudos for finding 50% big ones! That's a score.

Statistically, that's an anomaly.
Fair points... And at that stage I was only looking for bigger than me, so what my experience with dick more proves is that close to 50% of guys are full of shit when it comes to quoting their proper size😄
 
Fair points... And at that stage I was only looking for bigger than me, so what my experience with dick more proves is that close to 50% of guys are full of shit when it comes to quoting their proper size😄
You are certainly right about that. I just feel bad that they think they have to, and that they don't understand what "average" really looks like.
 
Fair points... And at that stage I was only looking for bigger than me, so what my experience with dick more proves is that close to 50% of guys are full of shit when it comes to quoting their proper size😄
All your links are broken
 
I haven't said anything of the kind - I've only quoted findings from reputable sources.
But you are right, the OP clearly wanted this thread as an echo chamber for his fantasies rather than a discussion of reality. I haven't played along with that and that isn't really fair.
I'll see myself out :)
Indeed. So many Lit threads are like this one.
 
I’m 5’7. Fit. Small hands and feet. Despite internet BS, there aren’t THAT many 8+ cocks around. Despite being small of stature, my 7.5x6c cock has been judged large—sometimes largest!—by nearly every person, male or female, I’ve been with. Height isn’t the tell. Also, men should stop pretending that 6” is “small”—in fact, well above average
I totally agree with you. I used to have a wank buddy visit me to enjoy mutual masturbation while we watched porn. He was around 5’6” in height , but sported a gorgeous thick 7 incher. On the other extreme, another wank buddy (I was a horny devil and still am) was over six feet tall with athletic body whose cock was about 5 inches when fully erect. Actually, his balls were out of proportion to his cock and he was a very heavy cummer! Both guys were a pleasure to service!
 
If you're really asking whether the whole BBC mythos has any validity, whatsoever, the answer in my experience is abso-fucking-lutely. I mean, hey, I'm an aggressive debunker and most things DO become bigger-than-life but the whole thing around BBC? Can't say it's based on nothing.
 
There really isn't a need for a larger sample size than that:
https://tools4dev.org/resources/how-to-choose-a-sample-size/#:~:text=Surveys where you plan to,useful, idea about their opinions.

Main point:
A good maximum sample size is usually around 10% of the population, as long as this does not exceed 1000. For example, in a population of 5000, 10% would be 500. In a population of 200,000, 10% would be 20,000. This exceeds 1000, so in this case the maximum would be 1000.

Even in a population of 200,000, sampling 1000 people will normally give a fairly accurate result. Sampling more than 1000 people won’t add much to the accuracy given the extra time and money it would cost.
Um, sample size is meaningless if you did not use a probability sampling methodology, such as simple random or stratified sampling. Most surveys use convenience sampling, which is a not a probability methodology and no amount of statistical magic can fix that, (Yeager et al., 2011). If you use probability sampling, yes, you can leverage the Central Limit Theorem, but using a non-probability technique? I'm sorry, but you're fucked.

I said all this and more in my published paper titled "Post-Stratification as a Mechanism for Reducing Error Variance via Statistical Chicanery in a Non-Probability Sample? Nigger, Please!"
 
Um, sample size is meaningless if you did not use a probability sampling methodology, such as simple random or stratified sampling. Most surveys use convenience sampling, which is a not a probability methodology and no amount of statistical magic can fix that, (Yeager et al., 2011). If you use probability sampling, yes, you can leverage the Central Limit Theorem, but using a non-probability technique? I'm sorry, but you're fucked.

I said all this and more in my published paper titled "Post-Stratification as a Mechanism for Reducing Error Variance via Statistical Chicanery in a Non-Probability Sample? Nigger, Please!"
See, I'm glad someone understands exactly why I used the "forbidden word". Because if you don't mean it to be racist - it is not racist! It's not magic! That means other words can be just as bad if that is the intent. Here? It's a phrase meaning, "You expect me to believe that?" or similar. And no, I'm not going to that cliche'd well of "I have black friends". Because, um...I have black Daddies! One who I'm trying to get over here, tonight! He's gorgeous and I want to be naked with him! Not that I use that as any "excuse" for one good reason - no such excuse is necessary. It ain't magic. The question is intent.
 
I've been with lots and lots of men, and I haven't noticed much difference. The biggest dick I've taken was a black guy, but the second biggest was a white guy. The white guy wasn't quite as long but he was thicker. I've been with black men who had very small dicks, and whites and Latinos who had huge ones.
 
And if you'd like a bit of facts with your fantasies:
https://www.healthline.com/health/is-penis-size-genetic#quick-answer

(Spoiler: "Race has no bearing on penis size")
Much appreciated.

There do seem to be small, average differences between different regional genetic populations (i.e. race), according to the science I've seen.

But to claim that "most" black men are 7" or larger is statistically and rationally absurd.

The biggest cocks I've seen have tended to be black. But I've seen many white cocks that are as big.

The preceding anecdotal observations comes mostly from visiting adult resorts where nudity is mandatory or common.
 
And if you'd like a bit of facts with your fantasies:
https://www.healthline.com/health/is-penis-size-genetic#quick-answer

(Spoiler: "Race has no bearing on penis size")
Yes, but you are missing one thing - at least one. And btw, I am a PhD statistician - yes, thank you...it makes the ladies moist and the guys turgid. That is complete fiction. Race may not have a bearing on penis size and in fact, that is my understanding as well. However, the sub-population of guys that we would be meeting are not, I would heavily wager, a random sample from the populations comprising the various races. So while the population means (average) may be similar, you cannot generalize to any non--probability sample. As well, two groups could have very similar, even identical, averages (means) but have different distributions. This is the case with males v females and IQ - the two sexes are fairly equivalent with respect to average but the males have a wider distribution (higher standard deviation) and tend to have more examples on the tails, both below and above the mean - so the idiots and geniuses. I'm the former...wait, hold on...
 
Back
Top