Republicans are quite simply un-American

I won't generalise, but in that case you do fit the label 'EVIL' in my opinion. And that's only one of the labels. 'Childish' also comes to mind, but there are far too many to mention them all.

Then include yourself as well until you give up civilization.
 
Buzz off, Bozo. I read no further than this and I have you on ignore and only see your posts when I'm reading without clicking in. I have no interest in your crazy politics or in your trying to get me to respond to you. You're total trash in my book.

Incidentally, have you found a citation where I either support entirely open borders or illegal immigration yet? Until you do, shut the fuck up about it.

I don't really care if you respond or not. Your lack of response is amusing to me.

Why the hostility? Why the names? Can't you argue your point without resorting to childish games? (to steal a comment from Ruben)

You lost in 2016. You will lose in 2020. President Warren? LMAO
Move to Guatamala or something. You can be with the people you claim to support. Much easier to stand on their bodies when you're there with them...
 
Last edited:
gunthernehmen writes: "...even if the entire United States from coast to coast immediately ceased to use any sort of energy whatsoever, it would not make the slightest difference because the VAST percentage of the contribution to the change is coming from places that will not change their ways and you/we have no control whatsoever over."

Very true! Why doesn't Al Gore get his film ("An Inconvenient Truth") translated into the Chinese & Indian languages (Hindi?) so that the people in those nations can watch it and do something about their enormous (and growing) carbon footprints?

"Why the hostility? Why the names? Can't you argue your point without resorting to childish games?

Yeah... far-left progressives throw-out childish insults to show how much they CARE about things, gunthernehman. If you oppose their political views, they think you're Hitler, and they're positive that Hitler & Trump are one and the same person. A lot of them view our U.S. Constitution as racist, especially the parts about the Electoral College & the Second Amendment.

dan_c00000 writes: "If you need a basic history of Communism and socialism send me a PM. I can recommend a few good books."

You can learn a LOT about Communism simply by watching what's going on right now in Venezuela. It's the "politics of envy" at work, destroying a once free & prosperous country, while America's socialists look the other way, pretending that it doesn't concern them in any way.
 
Republican/Democrat politicians are 99% over-ambitious opportunistic criminals. One Party is in no way better, or less irresponsible and criminal than the other. The "divide and conquer" strategy is working very well. Rep/Dem is just a good cop/bad cop routine, while both are self-serving entities.

To be "American" is to be independent, unconfined by an over-arching Federal Authority.

Border States could handle immigration without Federal interference.
 
Last edited:
Republican/Democrat politicians are 99% over-ambitious opportunistic criminals. One Party is in no way better, or less irresponsible and criminal than the other. The "divide and conquer" strategy is working very well. Rep/Dem is just a good cop/bed cop routine, while both are self-serving entities.

To be "American" is to be independent, unconfined by an over-arching Federal Authority.

Border States could handle immigration without Federal interference.

"I'm living in America, and in America you're on your own. America's not a country. It's just a business."

-Killing Them Softly, 2012
 
Atmospheric carbon dioxide is at a record high, Europe is in the midst of a hellish heat wave, and extreme weather is ravaging large swaths of the globe, but President Donald Trump dismissed the need for climate action during the G20 summit in Japan on Saturday and falsely claimed that air and water in the U.S. are the "cleanest" they have ever been.

"I'm not looking to create a standard that is so high that we're going to lose 20-25 percent of our production. I'm not willing to do that," Trump continued. "We have the cleanest water we've ever had, we have the cleanest air—you saw the reports come out recently. We have the cleanest air we've ever had. But I'm not willing to sacrifice the tremendous power of what we've built up over a long period of time, and what I've enhanced and revived."

As the Associated Press reported after Trump claimed earlier this month that the U.S. is "setting records environmentally" with its air and water quality, "U.S. does not have the cleanest air, and it hasn't gotten better under the Trump administration."

"The U.S. ranks poorly on smog pollution, which kills 24,000 Americans per year," according to AP. "On a scale from the cleanest to the dirtiest, the U.S. is at 123 out of 195 countries measured."

Furthermore, according to a study published last year in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, tens of millions of Americans are exposed to unsafe drinking water each year.

https://www.commondreams.org/news/2...wmkLH-ZhP4cahV3aeVeSJDMzKUqYmJMJEM72rg97xrAEk
 
Actually, I've ruined you on this many, many times now and you keep dodging the question but I'll ask it again.

If countries with socialized medicine and stricter gun controls are so horrible than how come they're rated as more free than the U.S. by both the right wing Heritage Foundation and the right wing CATO Institute.

Poor racist bot. Going to be a tough day making up more lies.



Our ranking has decrease mainly due to Obama's economic policies. Obama was for higher taxes and tons of regulations, basically stagnating our economy. Socialized medicine would add to our loss of freedom ( freedom of choice ) ( words like "if you like your doctor you keep your doctor" BIG LIE! ) Trump has cut taxes and scrapped hundreds of strangling regulations. I forecast by 2020 just in time for the elections we'll be back on top. Obama fucked things up soooo badly it going to take Trump 8 years to clean up the mess.
 
The 'idiots' being the scientists who ambiguously point out at global warming? Who is the idiot; the mother warning the child the radiator is hot, or the child still sticking out its hand and burning it?

No, there is no debate whether climate chance is true or not; not within the scientific community. There is only a debate whether the consequences will be bad or very bad, and if there is still a possibility to reduce the effects.




There is plenty of debate amongst scientist to this day. There is a big difference between global warming and climate change. There is no concrete evidence that co2 is actually aiding in global warming. We don't know that what's happening today is cyclical over hundreds of years. There's been scientific studies that predict the earth's core could be shifting and could be affecting climate. Weather, climate change all the time. Global warming is a fact but it's affect are not proven yet and how much varies from scientist to scientist.
 
RubenR writes: "There is no debate about global warming. There is debate about where and how much, ocean currents, atmospheric currents etc. etc. make things complicated, but the net result, warming, is undebated."

There's ALSO signs of global warming on MARS, Ruben! The Martian icecaps are shrinking!

SO WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO ABOUT IT?

The idea that Al Gore is going to stop this planet from experiencing climate change is ABSURD! All that Al Gore & his Democratic Party wants is POLITICAL POWER, and they'll happily use climate change as an excuse to usher in their damaging political agenda! It's like the border - the Dems have no solutions but they want the POWER that they've lost to President Trump back, and they'll happily use problems at the border to achieve it.

Seriously, the developing economies of China & India are more to blame for made-made climate change than ANYTHING going on here in the United States! How exactly are the Democrats in America going to talk China & India into both turning back their respective clocks to when they were both living a poverty-stricken existence (albeit with a smaller carbon footprint!)

I loved seeing all of those Democratic Party presidential candidates flying into Miami in their private jets to preach to us about global warming! They are the biggest HYPOCRITES on the planet!
 
There is no debate about global warming.

Well then what is this discussion thread about? Knitting?

Don't be silly. Of course there is debate about global warming. Climate change and most importantly the REASONS for those things.

The scarologists seem to think that by calling it "settled science" and "there's no debate" then everyone will simply accept what they say.

20 years ago the scarologists were telling us airplanes would fall out of the sky at midnight on 12/31/1999. They didn't.

What's it going to be 20 years from now?
 
Well then what is this discussion thread about? Knitting?

Don't be silly. Of course there is debate about global warming. Climate change and most importantly the REASONS for those things.

The scarologists seem to think that by calling it "settled science" and "there's no debate" then everyone will simply accept what they say.

20 years ago the scarologists were telling us airplanes would fall out of the sky at midnight on 12/31/1999. They didn't.

What's it going to be 20 years from now?
People took action before Y2K to make sure that didn’t happen. Big difference.
 
Al Gore....lol.

If the climate change nutters wanted a chance to be taken seriously, they should have picked a better spokesman...
We MUST reduce our carbon foot print.... Says the guy with a sasquatch sized footprint for himself..
Stunning how gullible some people can be...
 
Well then what is this discussion thread about? Knitting?

Don't be silly. Of course there is debate about global warming. Climate change and most importantly the REASONS for those things.

The scarologists seem to think that by calling it "settled science" and "there's no debate" then everyone will simply accept what they say.

20 years ago the scarologists were telling us airplanes would fall out of the sky at midnight on 12/31/1999. They didn't.

What's it going to be 20 years from now?

Yeah, look at the flat earthers, finally their science is up for debate too!!!
 
Al Gore....lol.

If the climate change nutters wanted a chance to be taken seriously, they should have picked a better spokesman...
We MUST reduce our carbon foot print.... Says the guy with a sasquatch sized footprint for himself..
Stunning how gullible some people can be...
Why do you believe that his carbon footprint is too large? Do you think that it shouldn’t be, and why?
 
People took action before Y2K to make sure that didn’t happen. Big difference.

Has anyone pointed out to him all the other many and varied predictions that have turned out to be wrong? Like wait till he gets a load of the whole "Dewey defeats Truman" headline.
 
Tongue Twisted writes: "If the climate change nutters wanted a chance to be taken seriously, they should have picked a better spokesman...

Exactly right! Al Gore is perfect Hollywood casting for the role of a fat flim-flam artist!

http://conservativedatingsite.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/AlGore_Fraud_01_250px.jpg - (The PERFECT cover-boy for "Non-Scientist" magazine!)

https://downtrend.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/algore.png - (I'm going to go with answer #2!)

http://thefinereport.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/The-Gore-Whore.png - (The Gore Whore - preaching global warming made him a rich man!)

https://thefederalistpapers.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/al-gore-vs-al-gore-750.jpg - (And THIS was the Democratic Party's presidential candidate in 2000!)

dan_c00000 writes: "Has anyone pointed out to him all the other many and varied predictions that have turned out to be wrong?"

Amazingly enough, a LOT of liberal Democrats continue to admire & respect Al Gore, despite the bullsh*t that he's been peddling these past two decades! He is the wealthy televangelist of the climate change religion!
 
I'm not read up on Georgia politics,

Of course you aren't. Here, let me help you get caught up.

Secretary of State Kemp's actions during the election were textbook voter suppression. His actions were strategic, careless and aimed at silencing the voting power of communities of color in the state.

Consider these numbers.

• In the three months leading up to election day, more than 85,000 voters were purged from rolls under Kemp. During 2017 668,000 voters were purged, according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

• Of those 2017 numbers, investigative reporter Greg Palast told Salon, 200,000 people left the state, died or moved out their district, making them legitimate cancellations. However, through litigation, he got the entire purge list. “Of the 400,000 who supposedly moved, our experts will tell a court that 340,134 never moved – wrongly purged,” Palast told the Guardian, saying people had been purged for not voting in an election or two.


• Furthermore from 2012 to 2016, 1.5 million voters were purged – more than 10% of all voters – from records, according to a 2018 report from the Brennan Center for Justice. In comparison, 750,000 were purged from 2008 to 2012.
 
People took action before Y2K to make sure that didn’t happen. Big difference.

The actions taken were actually pretty trivial. And mostly on the part of the OS developers. I also made some scratch reviewing code to see if they needed to do anything. Again, trivial changes.

The actions to change global warming or whatever it's called now are potentially catastrophic and frankly, I doubt the "scientists" involved actually understand the problems enough to allow them to experiment with our lives. Have you never seen a movie about mad scientists? You or one of you scarologists proposed some pretty scary ideas a while back. Stop screwing with stuff you don't understand. If things go south then they go south. You stand as good or better a chance of making it worse.
 
If you are interested, try to read beyond the first sentence of my comment; if you're not, don't ask questions.

I actually did, but it was the same tirade over and over. "we know" and "there's no debate".

No, we don't know the theories that you are stating as fact are valid and there is plenty of room for debate otherwise there wouldn't BE any, now would there be?
 
Yeah, look at the flat earthers, finally their science is up for debate too!!!

Oh I don't think the climate scarologists are in the same category as the flat earthers. The one's that actually BELIEVE the earth is flat are bit touched if you know what I mean, and the rest are just having fun.

The scarologists are trying to make MONEY and POWER. Power over people, of course, I don't mean electricity.

BTW, your "location" made me smile. Thanks.
 
Even you can figure out what is meant by it. Those are scientists working in the field of climate change; their opinions matter; their consensus matters in this political game.

Do you understand that opinions, whether they matter or not, are not FACTS?

And consensus is not validation, it's just some people agreeing with each other.
 
Why do you believe that his carbon footprint is too large? Do you think that it shouldn’t be, and why?

I don't believe his or anyone's is too large.
I just see his typical elitist, do as I say, not as I do stance and find humor in the fact that so many still find him, or his rhetoric, credible...
 
Back
Top