Republicans vow to fight ISIS with all the forces necessary

[Aglaopheme]

Oh Lordy.

 

[JackLuis]

I don't think the first part is true, and why would you be such an ass as to want to do the second part?

Don't be stupid and suggest that you posted your mishmash on voting for Obama to troll me. It's quite possible you were trolling someone else, though.

I didn't target you sr71 directly. I pretty much ignore you unless you're talking about grammar or style. But admit it, you bit like a big mouthed bass!

As for the second part I was talking about the ABH crowd (Anybody But Hillary) who will write in Obama instead of voting for a Wall Street shill.

 

[sr71plt]

I didn't target you sr71 directly. I pretty much ignore you unless you're talking about grammar or style. But admit it, you bit like a big mouthed bass!

As for the second part I was talking about the ABH crowd (Anybody But Hillary) who will write in Obama instead of voting for a Wall Street shill.

Really weak try to cover for your inane post and pretending it was posted for me.

(And I think you have failed to notice that the far left dumped Obama some time ago. But then, you don't do much thinking about anything but your "oh, my gosh, look at this" googling activities.)

 

[JackLuis]

Really weak try to cover for your inane post and pretending it was posted for me.

(And I think you have failed to notice that the far left dumped Obama some time ago. But then, you don't do much thinking about anything but your "oh, my gosh, look at this" googling activities.)

As I said you were simply bycatch.

And yes I do a lot of "OMG look at this" because I can't believe that the world is as crazy as it is.

I've found it's hard to have a rational discussion with most people because they tend to think a challenge to an idea is a personal attack. You know what I mean don't you?

It amazes me that people are so sure that they have all the answers that it is impossible that they would allow anyone to have another viewpoint.

 

[JackLuis]

Study Finds Sarcasm Is Good For You. Yeah, Right.

In the new study, Harvard Business School behavioral scientist Francesca Gino reports on research she and her colleagues conducted to test some of the ancillary effects of sarcasm. She starts with the commonsense observation that business and marital communications often advise people to avoid sarcasm, since its effects are often perceived to be cutting and cruel. This remains good advice in situations where there might be tension, for instance between couples in relationship counseling, which might explain why the marriage counselors advise against sarcasm, no?

Gino acknowledges the scornful intent of much sarcasm: “Thanks for putting in all that effort on your report” isn’t necessarily praise if the report is full of typos. In fact, she cites a study in which sarcastic statements were seen as more harshly critical than open, direct criticism. For instance, telling a smoker “I see you don’t have a healthy concern for your lungs” was perceived as milder criticism than “I see you have a healthy concern for your lungs.” (Gino didn’t comment, however, on the example itself. The “literal” statement sounds weirdly stilted, while the sarcastic statement sounds like something someone might actually say.)

 

[JackLuis]

I think the next time Republicans start beating their chest about how they would beat ISIS, that Obama should issue them a CAR-4 with 200 rounds of ammo, put them on a plane to parachute into Syria and show us how it is done.

I'd like to see Marco, Teddy Boy, or the Donald lead a platoon of Republican Right-Guards and take on 10-20 ISIS fanatics.

 

[Hard_Rom]

I think the next time Republicans start beating their chest about how they would beat ISIS, that Obama should issue them a CAR-4 with 200 rounds of ammo, put them on a plane to parachute into Syria and show us how it is done.

I'd like to see Marco, Teddy Boy, or the Donald lead a platoon of Republican Right-Guards and take on 10-20 ISIS fanatics.

When I was in the big advantage or the AR over an FN was the fact you could carry 500 rounds into battle as opposed to the 200 full rifle cartridges of the FN. Best to get hold of a C2 gunners mag. 30 up from 20 rounds.

Has all the auxiliary gear being carried now cut into that number? 200 now?

Or just making a point?

 

[phrodeau]

When I was in the big advantage or the AR over an FN was the fact you could carry 500 rounds into battle as opposed to the 200 full rifle cartridges of the FN. Best to get hold of a C2 gunners mag. 30 up from 20 rounds.

Has all the auxiliary gear being carried now cut into that number? 200 now?

Or just making a point?

Well, you don't want too much ammo falling into enemy hands.

 

[Hard_Rom]

Then give them 2 rounds. 1 for a bad guy and 1 for themselves to avoid capture. Or be brave and take out two bad guys and take the head hacking off bit. Two dead terrorist and one dead Republican candidate. Tragic loss of human life.

 

[JackLuis]

When I was in the big advantage or the AR over an FN was the fact you could carry 500 rounds into battle as opposed to the 200 full rifle cartridges of the FN. Best to get hold of a C2 gunners mag. 30 up from 20 rounds.

Has all the auxiliary gear being carried now cut into that number? 200 now?

Or just making a point?

As was said, don't want to loose too much ammo to the other side. But when I was carrying the M-14, 200 rounds was a load. The 5.56 mm with 30 rnd mags' i guess 10 mags would be a bag full. How much is too much ammo, well how much can you carry and still march?

I'd like to see Teddy Boy's face as they hand him a parachute, a gun and web gear to humiliate ISIS personally.

The crew chief will need a tarp to make it easier to clean up the C-130 'cause I'm sure that would be shit on the floor after they exited, (were tossed out).