Rogue Anti-Trump Judge Hit With Articles Of Impeachment

Politics

JUST IN: Rogue Anti-Trump Judge Hit With Articles Of Impeachment​


Published
2 hours ago
on
March 18, 2025
By
Chris Powell

A House GOP lawmaker has officially filed articles of impeachment against Chief Judge James E. Boasberg of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, accusing him of abusing his judicial power to block President Trump’s deportation efforts.

Congressman Brandon Gill (R-TX) introduced the resolution on Tuesday, citing Boasberg’s intervention as a direct constitutional violation that obstructed the president’s enforcement of immigration law. “By thwarting President Trump’s lawful efforts to deport violent illegal alien gangsters, Judge Boasberg created a constitutional crisis. He is unfit for judicial office,” Gill wrote in a statement on social media.

The resolution, introduced in the House of Representatives, formally accuses Boasberg of high crimes and misdemeanors, specifically charging him with abuse of power by interfering in the executive branch’s authority to enforce federal law, including the Alien Enemies Act.

The resolution states: “Chief Judge Boasberg, in violation of his oath of office, did knowingly and willfully use his judicial position to advance political gain while interfering with the President’s constitutional prerogatives and enforcement of the rule of law.”

The impeachment article argues that under the Alien Enemies Act, the president has sole and unreviewable discretion to determine whether an invasion has taken place and to act accordingly. It cites Supreme Court precedent from Ludecke v. Watkins (1948), which affirmed that such executive determinations are not subject to judicial review.

More here: https://trendingpoliticsnews.com/ju...-judge-hit-with-articles-of-impeachment-mace/

Hopefully a vote of the House on these articles will be successful.
Screenshot_2025-03-21-08-16-33-10_f598e1360c96b5a5aa16536c303cff92.jpg

https://www.facebook.com/reel/638008992267356/?mibextid=rS40aB7S9Ucbxw6v
 
There's an ethics rule involved. SCOTUS justices should refrain from public comment on political issues or matters which may come before them.

This is the claim they ALL make during their confirmation hearings. Roberts should have kept his DAMNED mouth shut because it completely destroys anyone in future confirmation hearings from making the claim of neutrality.
The way the right wing scotus members all said they believe in precedent?

Fucking hypocrite
 
Just checking in...

Did the judge get convicted on articles of impeachment?

Did Elon purchase MSNBC yet?

Are we now in the Golden Age of Amerikkka?
 
Back
Top