Roy Moore

There’s a tricky little thing called the Statute of Limitations. Moore can’t be prosecuted for things that happened over thirty years ago.

And laches protects Moore from civil liability. Bottom line is that the women who came forward had nothing to personally gain by doing so beyond their own peace of mind.
 
And laches protects Moore from civil liability. Bottom line is that the women who came forward had nothing to personally gain by doing so beyond their own peace of mind.

How can you say that for certain? The DNC could be paying them to lie about Moore. I'm not saying that's the case, but I also can't say for sure it isn't, and neither can you. We all know how dirty politics can be.
 
How can you say that for certain? The DNC could be paying them to lie about Moore. I'm not saying that's the case, but I also can't say for sure it isn't, and neither can you. We all know how dirty politics can be.

Well, how can you say that for certain? Highly advanced alien civilizations could be monitoring us from beyond our current level of technology, ready to destroy humanity at a whim for any reason of their choosing. I'm not saying that's the case, but I also can't say for sure it isn't, and neither can you. We all know how huge the universe actually is and what humans do to ants when wearing shoes.
 
No one needs to know whether Moore broke the law, whether the statute of limitations protects him, what the weight of evidence is.

All a person needs to ask is this: "Is Roy Moore a dispicable, perverted, hypocritial, lying shit?

And that's a no brainer. :D
 
There’s a tricky little thing called the Statute of Limitations. Moore can’t be prosecuted for things that happened over thirty years ago.
No, but elections aren't trials. More that a few pols of all breeds have been (re-)elected whilst imprisoned. People can vote for convicted felons if they wish. And they can vote for or against accused abusers if they wish. Tromp wasn't much slowed by marital and underage rape accusations or his boasted assaults.

Note that nobody recently outed and ousted has been prosecuted for anything, although Weinstein and Spacey seem likely to face charges. All could run for office. Might have to register as (R) if they want political careers, though.
 
I'm surprised no-one mentioned the recent Moore development, the Project Veritas attempt to run a sting against the Washington Post with a woman claiming Moore got her pregnant when she was 15.
Unfortunately for them, the WP actually does research and fact checking before publishing such stories.
 
No, but elections aren't trials. More that a few pols of all breeds have been (re-)elected whilst imprisoned. People can vote for convicted felons if they wish. And they can vote for or against accused abusers if they wish. Tromp wasn't much slowed by marital and underage rape accusations or his boasted assaults.

Note that nobody recently outed and ousted has been prosecuted for anything, although Weinstein and Spacey seem likely to face charges. All could run for office. Might have to register as (R) if they want political careers, though.

A few years age, a dead man was elected to the Senate from MO. And the fact of his death was common knowledge.
 
He announced today that he will not seek reelection. So long "Smokey Joe".
 
I'm surprised no-one mentioned the recent Moore development, the Project Veritas attempt to run a sting against the Washington Post with a woman claiming Moore got her pregnant when she was 15.
Unfortunately for them, the WP actually does research and fact checking before publishing such stories.

That and this

http://www.newsweek.com/roy-moore-accusers-trump-alabama-724562

During a rally Monday night, in which he declined to take any questions, Moore said he did not “know any of [the women].” That contradicts previous statements he has made about his accusers.

Specifically, Moore has said that he did know Debbie Wesson Gibson, who told The Washington Post that the former Alabama Supreme Court chief justice dated and kissed her in 1981, when she was 17.

“I remember her as a good girl,” Moore told Sean Hannity earlier this month. “I know her, but I don’t remember going out on dates. I knew her as a friend. If we did go out on dates, then we did. But I don’t remember that.”

In the same interview, he also admitted to knowing Gloria Thacker Deason, who told the Post that Moore took her on dates and gave her wine when she was 18. At the time, the legal drinking age in Alabama was 19.
 
Barton may be a hypocrite, and any congressman post-Weiner who is still sending out dick pics, even to someone he's actually banging, is too dumb to live.

But this does seem to fall under the heading of revenge porn, which could be a real problem for the woman depending on the local laws.

I was going to disagree with you, then I read this

Both Barton and the woman said the interactions were consensual, but the woman said she felt deceived and betrayed after she learned about other women Barton was having similar relationships with.

I had not read that before.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...on-says-he-will-retire-from-texas-house-seat/
 
No one needs to know whether Moore broke the law, whether the statute of limitations protects him, what the weight of evidence is.

All a person needs to ask is this: "Is Roy Moore a dispicable, perverted, hypocritial, lying shit?

And that's a no brainer. :D

You do realize that at least half (or more, no pun intended) of what you implied /ascribed to Roy Moore can be said of the 534 current members of congress.
 
You do realize that at least half (or more, no pun intended) of what you implied /ascribed to Roy Moore can be said of the 534 current members of congress.

Only half, mebbe closer to 90%. ;)

But Moore is the one up for election at the moment - so voters need to consider whether they should vote for this particular despicable, perverted, hypocritical, lying shit.

For what it's worth I think, and in some respects hope, the good Christian folks down in Alabammy do put him in the Senate, because getting elected would just be the beginning of the pantomime.
 
I suspect the people of Alabama will elect Moore just to get him out of the state for a while.
 
Only half, mebbe closer to 90%. ;)

But Moore is the one up for election at the moment - so voters need to consider whether they should vote for this particular despicable, perverted, hypocritical, lying shit.

For what it's worth I think, and in some respects hope, the good Christian folks down in Alabammy do put him in the Senate, because getting elected would just be the beginning of the pantomime.

I was being generous :eek:
 
I wonder how women feel about voting for a man who thinks women shouldn't be allowed to vote.

:D

No doubt you exactly likewise wondered how women felt about voting for a man who thinks pussy is ok to grab...

How'd that work out for you and Billary?
 
:D

No doubt you exactly likewise wondered how women felt about voting for a man who thinks pussy is ok to grab...

How'd that work out for you and Billary?

Personally, I would never grab a pussy. That denotes roughness, and a woman's pussy should be treated gently - caressed and stroked and petted, either with fingers or tongues. :heart: As for the four-legged kind, they can and will bite and scratch if you grab them. :eek:
 
:D

No doubt you exactly likewise wondered how women felt about voting for a man who thinks pussy is ok to grab...
Nope, not really. I knew a significant number of women hang out with scumbags by them saying, "All men say things like that" and "It's just locker room talk."

I know you don't understand the difference between bragging about sexual assault and saying women shouldn't be allowed to vote or hold office, but there is a difference.
 
No one needs to know whether Moore broke the law, whether the statute of limitations protects him, what the weight of evidence is.

All a person needs to ask is this: "Is Roy Moore a dispicable, perverted, hypocritial, lying shit?

And that's a no brainer. :D
What's his Lit user name?
 
Back
Top