Roy Moore

Quote:

Fox News updated a story that erroneously claimed one of Roy Moore’s accusers had “forged” evidence she’d presented to bolster her claim against him.



She added the date and where it happened. That's it.
 
I have no disagreement here, but that is not the point of discussion. The girls who were smooching with Moore, whose age cannot be mentioned here, were not raped or even abused. They were over the age of consent, so no rape or abuse was intended. If, as the word was defined by you, grooming of a person is intended to lead to abuse, no grooming was happening. That is, unless you consider mutually consensual sex between two people, particularly a male and a female, who have reached the age of consent to be abuse.



Even 40 years ago, 32 was not considered middle-age. 39 might have been early middle age. I'm considerably older than my thirties. In fact, I have grandchildren who are in their thirties.

Do your grandchildren try to groom teenagers too?
 
Aw, look at little Lance begging for attention. Here you go, little Lance, I've acknowledged your desperation.

Allo, I am Magnus!




Roy moore would never be found guilty of anything they are saying he did in the 1970's.

So why do people waste all this time telling lies, sean?
 
Last edited:
"Forged" may have been the wrong choice of words, but the girl did admit to adding to the inscription and making it more intimate than it had been.

It's probably going to be proven she forged the signature as well, copied from the sig on her divorce papers signed by Moore's deputy.
 
Last edited:
"Forged" may have been the wrong choice of words, but the girl did admit to adding to the inscription and making it more intimate than it had been.

It's probably going to be proven she forged the signature as well, copied from the sig on her divorce papers signed by Moore's deputy.[/QUOTE]

There's far more evidence that you're vetteman, than there is that this woman forged any documents.

So I guess you're admitting it then?
 
Being a mad dog isn't illegal but do you want one running your life?
 
Somebody said he's an alcoholic as well. Probably a bad combination.

Who was this "somebody"?

You're "brand new", and you have people just randomly telling you stuff?

Really?

That doesn't sound very realistic. You and lance both use this sort of line all the time.

Who's cozying up to you guys who allegedly have never been here before?

:rolleyes:
 
Quote:

Fox News updated a story that erroneously claimed one of Roy Moore’s accusers had “forged” evidence she’d presented to bolster her claim against him.


"Forged" may have been the wrong choice of words, but the girl did admit to adding to the inscription and making it more intimate than it had been.
That makes Fox definitely Fake News. Where's the President's tweet condemning those Enemies of the State?
 
Pundits say that the Alabama election will hinge on the black vote.

Be prepared for lots of voter intimidation at the polls.

I'm going to make two bold predictions:
1. Moore will win
2. The number of black people going to the polls will be a new historical low.
 
Lunatic response. He must have handed you our ass on a regular basis to engender this much hate.:rolleyes:

Luk sees Vetteman behind ever post.

You're vetteman, son.

You can't go five posts without mentioning:
1. A guy's genitals.
2. A guy's ass.
3. Shit.

The fact that you say things like you share an ass with another man is the kind of slip vetteman made all the time.
 
You're vetteman, son.

You can't go five posts without mentioning:
1. A guy's genitals.
2. A guy's ass.
3. Shit.

The fact that you say things like you share an ass with another man is the kind of slip vetteman made all the time.

With those qualifications, the Lookatmycock guy is also Vetteman, yes?
 
Back
Top