Sen. Feinstein To Introduce "Assault Weapon" Ban

A revolver needs to be cocked and re-aimed before each shot, and carries a limited number of bullets.

There are only two reasons that people favor semi-automatic pistols over revolvers. They're either too lazy to cock or reload, or they're out to do some serious carnage. Fuck them both.


Double action revolvers only require you to pull the trigger, not cock it. Movies make their actors cock everything. I guess it adds emphasis to the OMG YOU DEAD NOW moment.

It would be pointless to purchase a pistol for home protection if you had to reload all the time. No gun is giving you unlimited bullets. But surely allowing for 6+ automatically reloaded bullets isn't too much to ask when you're facing an intruder. An event that, assuming it happens at all, will likely be a once in a lifetime event. You won't be mr. cool under pressure make every shot count, time to reload after 2 shots, guy. They're not too lazy to reload, they don't intend to miss. Pressure + limited bullets + moving target = ?
 
http://www.nrapublications.org/index.php/12717/the-ar-15-and-the-second-amendment-no-respect/

Historically Speaking
The development of the rifle known today as the AR-15 started in 1956. The strategy to ban it was unveiled in 1988.

At that time, Josh Sugarmann, former communications director of the National Coalition to Ban Handguns, pointed out in a strategy paper that the media had grown tired of the handgun issue, but “assault weapons” would be novel to them.

Further, he added in the memo, “The semi-automatic weapons’ menacing looks, coupled with the public’s confusion over fully automatic machine guns versus semi-automatic assault weapons—anything that looks like a machine gun is assumed to be a machine gun—can only increase the chance of public support for restrictions on these weapons” (“Assault Weapons and Accessories in America,” Education Fund to End Handgun Violence and New Right Watch, Sept. 1988).
 
So do semi autos, plus you do not have to cock a double action revolver each time you shoot it. I need one of those automatic aiming devices you speak of, yellow-neck.
The automatic aiming device is your own hand, dippy. With a semi-automatic or double action revolver or whatever instrument of multiple death you prefer, you only have to release the trigger and fire again and again.

Now work on convincing me that you need to fire again and again in rapid succession more than six times to repel the guy climbing through your window or onto your wife.
 
Then buy yourself two guns. Do I have to do all the math around here?
I have guns.

I have "access" to them, and have had "access" to them for over ten years.

So tell me how limiting "access to guns" can prevent me from shooting 20 children.
 
I could go postal at any time.

So could any of the other 100 million gun-owners in this country.

Then it would be worse than any zombie-apocalypse you could imagine.

People shooting people, dogs and cats living together...

I trust people, and they trust me.

And we have guns. So shut up.
 
Every time one of these idiot guns laws is passed, gun sales spike.

I wonder if Feinstein isn't working for the gun industry.
 
Still no examples of the kind of mischief those silly mass murderers were up to Ish?

Fucking moron.
 
I could go postal at any time.

So could any of the other 100 million gun-owners in this country.

Then it would be worse than any zombie-apocalypse you could imagine.

People shooting people, dogs and cats living together...

I trust people, and they trust me.

And we have guns. So shut up.


That would certainly bring about the Downfall of Civilization.
 
I could go postal at any time.

So could any of the other 100 million gun-owners in this country.

Then it would be worse than any zombie-apocalypse you could imagine.

People shooting people, dogs and cats living together...

I trust people, and they trust me.

And we have guns. So shut up.
As jeninflorida would remind us, 100 million postal people is simply too many.

If your ability to kill was limited to 12 schoolchildren instead of 20, that would be eight lives saved. Multiply by 100 million, and you could save all the teens in China.
 
Pick up a baggie and go for a walk, you seem a bit stressed.:rolleyes:

Why would I be stressed about his stupidity?

It's not like it's new.

Although this one was a real doozy.

Do you think he meant man=on-man mischief, cupcake? ;)
 
Back
Top