Sen. Feinstein To Introduce "Assault Weapon" Ban

I'll buy into this ban as soon as someone can tell me why their car needs to go faster than 75 mph. And tell me why car makers can get away with making cars that can break the law. Other than Utah and a couple counties in Texas, you won't find a speed limit higher than 75 mph, so why do you need a car that can go 100 mph? Maybe people like to go to racetracks where they can legally drive their cars fast. Sure, I'll buy that, if you own a sports car. But your average person doesn't take their minivan or sedan to the track, so why do they need to go faster than 75? How about this? All cars from now on will be limited to a top speed of 75, except for law enforcement and emergency vehicles, because a private citizen has no good reason to travel faster than 75.

OK, fine.
 
Since I'm not clairvoyant maybe you ought to ask him, twinkie.;)

You ran in here to protect him. I think you would have more insight into how your "bro" feels than I would.

I have no idea what you two say during pillow talk.
 
I didn't come in here to protect him. I came in to poke fun at you. He doesn't need my help defending himself.

Sure you didn't.

And he definitely needs help coming up with his mischief examples. Although he's probably too cowardly to return. Par for the course with him.
 
I wonder if Feinstein isn't working for the gun industry.

If she is she better move her ass before all the "I couldn't name one of them but I'm going to go stand out in the cold with a candle and cry b/c my friends are watching." types lose all their ra ra momentum. Next weekend is a new party bro and it will all be forgotten...school kids wah??
http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-prn1/41572_10150121143125324_8141703_n.jpg
http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-ash4/c0.32.180.180/s160x160/4486_95136036134_5316637_a.jpg
 
If she is she better move her ass before all the "I couldn't name one of them but I'm going to go stand out in the cold with a candle and cry b/c my friends are watching." types lose all their ra ra momentum. Next weekend is a new party bro and it will all be forgotten...school kids wah??
http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-prn1/41572_10150121143125324_8141703_n.jpg
http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-ash4/c0.32.180.180/s160x160/4486_95136036134_5316637_a.jpg


Just because you're forgettable doesn't mean they are.
 
Still no examples of the kind of mischief those silly mass murderers were up to Ish?

Fucking moron.

You didn't bother to look up the definition, did you? Rather limited in the use of the English language it appears.

And you totally avoided the issue by hinging your reply on a word that you obviously don't know how to use or what it means. Probably driven by the same emotions one would usually expect to see in a teenage drama queen.

The issue IS mental health, how you define 'threat to the public' and what you propose to do about it in the face of an entire series of Supreme Court decisions that essentially gut your ability to do anything.

Ishmael
 
Just because you're forgettable doesn't mean they are.

Oh yea? Planning on a visit to show your respects? Write a letter of condolences or send a care package to any of the families? Right...


I stocked the fridge, tanked up the car, then donated my last 700 bucks and sent a letter of condolences to the families b/c I know exactly what they are going through, what have you done I-man?

Here....pull your nose out of the stratosphere and put your money with your mouth is Col. Self Righteous

If you wish to make a donation by check, please send to
'My Sandy Hook Family Fund'
c/o Union Savings Bank
1 Commerce Dr.,
Newtown, CT 06470

https://www.everribbon.com/ribbon/view/10076


And none of it negates the fact the most people don't really give a fuck beyond "wow that sucks!!"
 
Last edited:
You didn't bother to look up the definition, did you? Rather limited in the use of the English language it appears.

And you totally avoided the issue by hinging your reply on a word that you obviously don't know how to use or what it means. Probably driven by the same emotions one would usually expect to see in a teenage drama queen.

The issue IS mental health, how you define 'threat to the public' and what you propose to do about it in the face of an entire series of Supreme Court decisions that essentially gut your ability to do anything.

Ishmael

I did. That doesn't change anything.
 
Oh yea? Planning on a visit to show your respects? Write a letter of condolences or send a care package to any of the families? Right...


I stocked the fridge, tanked up the car and then donated my last 700 bucks and sent a letter of condolences to the families b/c I know exactly what they are going through, what have you done I-man?

Here....pull your nose out of the stratosphere and put your money with your mouth is Col. Self Righteous

If you wish to make a donation by check, please send to
'My Sandy Hook Family Fund'
c/o Union Savings Bank
1 Commerce Dr.,
Newtown, CT 06470

https://www.everribbon.com/ribbon/view/10076


And none of it negates the fact the most people don't really give a fuck beyond "wow that sucks!!"

I did what I needed to do. The difference between you and me is that I don't publicize my actions to generate sympathy. Bet you made sure wrote your name in big, bold letters too. Maybe they'll list your name on the website, eh?

I checked off the box that said "make this donation anonymous".

Stick that in your pipe and smoke it, asshat.

ps - nice job making this once again about, you fucking crybaby. No wonder you're forgettable.
 
Please inform us why anyone besides law enforcement and military needs a gun that automatically reloads.

Semi-automatic, fully automatic, partially automatic or whatever fraction you want to call it, why do you need a gun that lets you shoot twice without re-aiming? Are you planning to miss?

Because it's fun.
 
Maybe it would be better appreciated if you sent them your weapons to melt down.
 
You didn't bother to look up the definition, did you? Rather limited in the use of the English language it appears.

And you totally avoided the issue by hinging your reply on a word that you obviously don't know how to use or what it means. Probably driven by the same emotions one would usually expect to see in a teenage drama queen.

The issue IS mental health, how you define 'threat to the public' and what you propose to do about it in the face of an entire series of Supreme Court decisions that essentially gut your ability to do anything.

Ishmael


Were you on the thread a couple months back where our conservatives were railing against doctors being able to hold patients who are a danger to themselves or others? It was evil and unconstitutional. Eyer was there and I think you were as well. I tried digging it up but search isn't working.
 
I did what I needed to do. The difference between you and me is that I don't publicize my actions to generate sympathy.

I don't want any sympathy, a thanks or even a fuck you....I didn't do it for the families, or the victims. That money will be one of many micro dents in their economic cost and my letter will most likely go unread and is probably of little or no value to anyone that might, whatever. I did it so I could get my warm fuzzy out of it....it feels good, that's all.

Bet you made sure wrote your name in big, bold letters too. Maybe they'll list your name on the website, eh? I checked off the box that said "make this donation anonymous".

Stick that in your pipe and smoke it, asshat.

No I actually wrote them a letter in ink, first name only and mailed it to them with a money order....I don't like deposits and all that other paper trail generating jazz, savvy?;)
 
I don't want any sympathy, a thanks or even a fuck you....I didn't do it for the families, or the victims. That money will be one of many micro dents in their economic cost and my letter will most likely go unread and is probably of little or no value to anyone that might, whatever. I did it so I could get my warm fuzzy out of it....it feels good, that's all.



No I actually wrote them a letter in ink, first name only and mailed it to them with a money order....I don't like deposits and all that other paper trail generating jazz, savvy?;)

And they'll be remembered next weekend, and the weekend after and the weekend after. And the next time there's a similar incident and every time thereafter.

Sorry that remembrance doesn't meet your threshold, but here too, this isn't about you or your warm fuzzy.
 
Were you on the thread a couple months back where our conservatives were railing against doctors being able to hold patients who are a danger to themselves or others? It was evil and unconstitutional. Eyer was there and I think you were as well. I tried digging it up but search isn't working.

Link the thread or shut up idiot. No one was 'railing'. Mere statement of fact implies no particular position.

Ishmael
 
Were you on the thread a couple months back where our conservatives were railing against doctors being able to hold patients who are a danger to themselves or others? It was evil and unconstitutional. Eyer was there and I think you were as well. I tried digging it up but search isn't working.
Oh, "conservatives... conservatives..."

Just say stuff.

It's not hard.
 
I have decided I do not know enough about the differentiation between the types of weapons available and how to define them to really have an informed opinion.

If BotanyBoy is to be believed, and the difference between a "should-be" banned, and a "should-not" be banned rifle is the plastic hand-grips, then there is a serious problem with effectively controlling 'guns'. Is it true that there is no difference between these weapons:
http://cdn1.cheaperthandirt.com/ctd_images/bgprod/14303.jpg
http://cdn1.cheaperthandirt.com/ctd_images/bgprod/7-GBCWA3F16M4.jpg
 
Were you on the thread a couple months back where our conservatives were railing against doctors being able to hold patients who are a danger to themselves or others? It was evil and unconstitutional. Eyer was there and I think you were as well. I tried digging it up but search isn't working.

There there. Let's calm down and think that maybe no one was really there, that maybe search isn't working because it really didn't happen. Just breathe deeply and let the Thorazine work its magic. Everything will be fine.

(Hide the guns from this one, OK.)
 
I have decided I do not know enough about the differentiation between the types of weapons available and how to define them to really have an informed opinion.

If BotanyBoy is to be believed, and the difference between a "should-be" banned, and a "should-not" be banned rifle is the plastic hand-grips, then there is a serious problem with effectively controlling 'guns'. Is it true that there is no difference between these weapons:



Pistol grips are the main thing, collapasable/adjustable stocks are the other biggie b/c they have the most visual impact and that's what gives them that tacticoolguy look, A2 style Flash Cages and bayonet lugs wrap up Assault rifles.

http://www.westforkarmory.com/1117-1655-large/mil-spec-bird-cage-flash-hider-w-crush-washer.jpg

and bayonet lugs wrap up "Assault" rifles.
http://mfiap.com/images/F32796648.jpg

Making the term "assault" rifle and the reason to ban them silly as all fuck

The Mini 14 and AR15 I posted fire the exact same round...diff internal operations but as far as putting Ft.Lbs of energy with rounds on target..yes they are of equivalent firepower.

If in doubt the laws surrounding this and the specs on both .223/5.56mm AR15's and Ruger Mini 14's can be found everywhere as they are both extremely common rifles.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top