Should the PB be renamed☆☆☆☆☆☆The Trump Board?☆☆☆☆☆☆

[icanhelp1]

We are talking about the same guy who is currently 'serving time' in the White House. You can't separate nor distingush between his actions based upon legal distinctions for the same physical acts of violence. Only a MAGA mind or an Arphy mind could split those hairs to their advantage.

WOW, then why bother with a justice system, we’ll just judge everyone using your premise that if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and looks like a duck…GUILTY!!!

 

[ll74]

WOW, then why bother with a justice system, we’ll just judge everyone using your premise that if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and looks like a duck…GUILTY!!!

This is the funniest shit today...irony hello!

 

[dmallord]

Big difference.

One’s a rapist, the other isnt.

Same guy! Same woman! Your failure to comprehend that is ludicrous.

 

[dmallord]

WOW, then why bother with a justice system, we’ll just judge everyone using your premise that if it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and looks like a duck…GUILTY!!!

Wow, so let’s just scrap the entire justice system and go with your logic: if it’s someone you like, no amount of evidence matters. Newsflash—it did go through the justice system. A jury—remember those? Regular people, not deep state lizard people—heard the case and found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation.

But sure, tell me more about how it 'wasn’t technically rape' like that somehow makes it respectable. That’s not a defense—it’s a desperate dodge.
Civil or criminal, the facts don’t magically change. He was held accountable in court. You just don’t like the result, so now you're playing legal hopscotch to protect your golden idol. Must be exhausting constantly moving the goalposts every time reality doesn’t flatter your guy. Don't duck the issue, he was guilty as charged!

 

[Lance_Castro]

Same guy! Same woman! Your failure to comprehend that is ludicrous.

I guess if you want to ignore or remain ignorant of what the Law says and what Courts say and do, go ahead.

 

[dmallord]

I guess if you want to ignore or remain ignorant of what the Courts say and do, go ahead.

See post 154.

I'm not ignoring anything the court said. A felon was found guilty in a court of law, convicted, and a verdict was rendered. Nothing about that is ignorant of what the court said.

You want to defend sexual assault, get a law degree and get in line behind righguard and derpy. You know the felon doesn't pay his legal team very well and they often end up in jail for some reason while defending him?

 

[Lance_Castro]

See post 154.

I'm not ignoring anything the court said. A felon was found guilty in a court of law, convicted, and a verdict was rendered. Nothing about that is ignorant of what the court said.

You want to defend sexual assault, get a law degree and get in line behind righguard and derpy. You know the felon doesn't pay his legal team very well and they often end up in jail for some reason while defending him?

Are you saying you don’t understand the difference between a Criminal Offence and a Civil Damages Suit?

If so, that would explain why you’re pestering everyone… you’re just stupid.

Lol

 

[jason28053]

This is the funniest shit today...irony hello!

I’m sure it’s lost on him

 

[Lance_Castro]

At last check, the lefty snitch squad has typed the word “trump” here 52 times in the first 12 hours today.

Didnt count their various other rude names for their Commander in Chief.

 

[icanhelp1]

Wow, so let’s just scrap the entire justice system and go with your logic: if it’s someone you like, no amount of evidence matters. Newsflash—it did go through the justice system. A jury—remember those? Regular people, not deep state lizard people—heard the case and found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation.

Well, NY did change the statutes of limitation law just to go after Trump, hiding behind some 'COVID' bullshit line. I believe in equal application of the law. Prosecuting sexual assault from 30 years ago is nothing more than the Kavanagh syndrome. Trump was charged but was justice served? Fuck no, this trial was agenda driven, character assassination, a smear campaign just before the elections brought forward by some lunatic dipshit gaming the system. The fact that you agree justice was served says a lot about you!!

The fact that you believe Trump could get a fair trial in NY really exposes your ignorance.

But sure, tell me more about how it 'wasn’t technically rape' like that somehow makes it respectable. That’s not a defense—it’s a desperate dodge.

Tell me, can someone technically and accurately recall what happened 30 years ago, her testimony was all over the charts. Why did she wait 30 years and why did Hochul agree to change the statute of limitations, the Adult Survivors act and you believe it had nothing to do with Trump. The evidence didn't convict Trump, a biased misinformed Jury did.

There are statutory explanations for a reason. Rape is a criminal violation.

Civil or criminal, the facts don’t magically change. He was held accountable in court. You just don’t like the result, so now you're playing legal hopscotch to protect your golden idol. Must be exhausting constantly moving the goalposts every time reality doesn’t flatter your guy. Don't duck the issue, he was guilty as charged!

Using the courts for unethical, underhanded interference ( LAWFARE) with the election process worked, that's as far as it goes. It worked in that he was found liable, but it wasn't justice and the American people didn't buy it. Just the opposite. Your TDS is quite remarkable.

 

[Lance_Castro]

“In December 2024, Trump settled a defamation case with ABC News after anchor George Stephanopoulos incorrectly stated that the jury found Trump liable for rape in the case.

ABC News agreed to pay $15 million to Trump's presidential library and $1 million for his legal fees, as well as issue a public apology.”


Please give me your real life Contact Info by PM so I can send your various libels to the President.
Lol

 

[dmallord]

Well, NY did change the statutes of limitation law just to go after Trump, hiding behind some 'COVID' bullshit line. I believe in equal application of the law. Prosecuting sexual assault from 30 years ago is nothing more than the Kavanagh syndrome. Trump was charged but was justice served? Fuck no, this trial was agenda driven, character assassination, a smear campaign just before the elections brought forward by some lunatic dipshit gaming the system. The fact that you agree justice was served says a lot about you!!

The fact that you believe Trump could get a fair trial in NY really exposes your ignorance.

Tell me, can someone technically and accurately recall what happened 30 years ago, her testimony was all over the charts. Why did she wait 30 years and why did Hochul agree to change the statute of limitations, the Adult Survivors act and you believe it had nothing to do with Trump. The evidence didn't convict Trump, a biased misinformed Jury did.

There are statutory explanations for a reason. Rape is a criminal violation.

Using the courts for unethical, underhanded interference ( LAWFARE) with the election process worked, that's as far as it goes. It worked in that he was found liable, but it wasn't justice and the American people didn't buy it. Just the opposite. Your TDS is quite remarkable.

Yep, of course you're right. Absolutely. There is no way the facts of the case stand in your way, and never mind that a jury made the decisions. That is not good enough for you as you want to be the judge and jury and would probably enjoy being the executioner.

Carry on. Stamp your feet. He lost the case, and it sticks in your craw. Sorry to be you.

 

[icanhelp1]

Yep, of course you're right. Absolutely. There is no way the facts of the case stand in your way, and never mind that a jury made the decisions. That is not good enough for you as you want to be the judge and jury and would probably enjoy being the executioner.

Carry on. Stamp your feet. He lost the case, and it sticks in your craw. Sorry to be you.

Nope, not at all, just remember biased jurors allowed a murderer walk.

The people saw through the lawfare and the lying and voted Trump into office. Now the lawfare has transferred to federal district judges.

The 34 felony convictions is a joke. Unfortunately it takes forever for the appellate process to work it's way through the court. The people saw through that sham as well. Gloat in your shallow victory but Trump is president.

 

[dmallord]

“In December 2024, Trump settled a defamation case with ABC News after anchor George Stephanopoulos incorrectly stated that the jury found Trump liable for rape in the case.

ABC News agreed to pay $15 million to Trump's presidential library and $1 million for his legal fees, as well as issue a public apology.”


Please give me your real life Contact Info by PM so I can send your various libels to the President.
Lol

You're really not very good at this.

Let me walk you through it slowly: Trump’s favorite lie—“I was found not guilty”—is like bragging you won a race you never ran. The truth? He settled most of those cases before they got to trial. That’s not exoneration—that’s hush money with paperwork.

Same thing with the ABC case. It didn’t go to court. ABC paid him off, just like Trump’s paid off his accusers. Why? Not because he was right, but because they had a multibillion-dollar merger hanging in the balance. And guess who had just enough political leverage to monkey-wrench it with a phone call? The Felon-in-Chief. So they threw him a bone—paid the troll toll—and moved on to secure the real prize.

Let’s be crystal clear: ABC wasn't found guilty of anything. Neither was Trump. Because neither case went to court.

If Trump actually cared about clearing his name, he’d have taken it to trial. But he didn’t. Why? Because even he knows that beneath the spray tan and the bravado lies the very real possibility of losing under oath. So he grabbed the cash, strutted offstage, and declared victory like the cartoon tyrant he is.

Proof? Notice how he never brought it up again. For someone obsessed with revenge and image, you'd think he’d ride that “win” forever. Instead, he bragged a little, then moved on to tearing democracy a new one.

So thanks for trying—but this example? Total backfire. ABC pulled a Trump move and won. And Trump? He got a few bucks and a moment of Fox News fluff before fading into his next courtroom drama.

Care to try again? I’ve got coffee, time, and plenty more chuckles to spare.

 

[Rightguide]

They are spineless

There are women in Congress with more testosterone than many of the men.

 

[Rightguide]

“In December 2024, Trump settled a defamation case with ABC News after anchor George Stephanopoulos incorrectly stated that the jury found Trump liable for rape in the case.

ABC News agreed to pay $15 million to Trump's presidential library and $1 million for his legal fees, as well as issue a public apology.”


Please give me your real life Contact Info by PM so I can send your various libels to the President.
Lol

I think CBS is next.

 

[dmallord]

Nope, not at all, just remember biased jurors allowed a murderer walk.

The people saw through the lawfare and the lying and voted Trump into office. Now the lawfare has transferred to federal district judges.

The 34 felony convictions is a joke. Unfortunately it takes forever for the appellate process to work it's way through the court. The people saw through that sham as well. Gloat in your shallow victory but Trump is president.

The felon wasn't accused of murder was he? I missed that trial!

'The people' didn't see through a sham at the trial. Twelve of his NY peers convicted him. No denying that or obfuscating it with your bias.

There was no lawfare in the voting process. He lost the first one. He attempted an insurrection and got away with it. The trial for that one was sacked over precedent that a sitting President doesn't get tried while in office. That's a shame and a stain on democracy.

 

[dmallord]

Well, NY did change the statutes of limitation law just to go after Trump, hiding behind some 'COVID' bullshit line. I believe in equal application of the law. Prosecuting sexual assault from 30 years ago is nothing more than the Kavanagh syndrome. Trump was charged but was justice served? Fuck no, this trial was agenda driven, character assassination, a smear campaign just before the elections brought forward by some lunatic dipshit gaming the system. The fact that you agree justice was served says a lot about you!!

The fact that you believe Trump could get a fair trial in NY really exposes your ignorance.

Tell me, can someone technically and accurately recall what happened 30 years ago, her testimony was all over the charts. Why did she wait 30 years and why did Hochul agree to change the statute of limitations, the Adult Survivors act and you believe it had nothing to do with Trump. The evidence didn't convict Trump, a biased misinformed Jury did.

There are statutory explanations for a reason. Rape is a criminal violation.

Using the courts for unethical, underhanded interference ( LAWFARE) with the election process worked, that's as far as it goes. It worked in that he was found liable, but it wasn't justice and the American people didn't buy it. Just the opposite. Your TDS is quite remarkable.

MDS [Mallord Deranged Syndrome] is making you sound deranged. You need help or more coffee.

 

[icanhelp1]

The felon wasn't accused of murder was he? I missed that trial!

She ( E Jean ) accused him of rape and a jury would not have any of it.

'The people' didn't see through a sham at the trial. Twelve of his NY peers convicted him. No denying that or obfuscating it with your bias.

There was no lawfare in the voting process. He lost the first one. He attempted an insurrection and got away with it. The trial for that one was sacked over precedent that a sitting President doesn't get tried while in office. That's a shame and a stain on democracy.

The felon wasn't accused of murder was he? I missed that trial!

'The people' didn't see through a sham at the trial. Twelve of his NY peers convicted him. No denying that or obfuscating it with your bias.

There was no lawfare in the voting process. He lost the first one. He attempted an insurrection and got away with it. The trial for that one was sacked over precedent that a sitting President doesn't get tried while in office. That's a shame and a stain on democracy.

This will shed some light on the Bragg /Merchan case.

 

[Lance_Castro]

Poor Ducky.

“In December 2024, Trump settled a defamation case with ABC News after anchor George Stephanopoulos incorrectly stated that the jury found Trump liable for rape in the case. “

George incorrectly stated that Trump had been found liable for rape.

This means Trump was not found liable for rape.

The jury found that he did not rape e jean carroll as per the legal definition of rape in new york state.

That’s what happened and that’s what matters.

What ducky or kaplan or stephanopolous or butters or anyone else “thinks” doesnt matter.

The court’s finding was no rapeee!

Sorry Charlie, Starkist is for tunas that taste good.

 

[dmallord]

Poor Ducky.

“In December 2024, Trump settled a defamation case with ABC News after anchor George Stephanopoulos incorrectly stated that the jury found Trump liable for rape in the case. “

George incorrectly stated that Trump had been found liable for rape.

This means Trump was not found liable for rape.

The jury found that he did not rape e jean carroll as per the legal definition of rape in new york state.

That’s what happened and that’s what matters.

What ducky or kaplan or stephanopolous or butters or anyone else “thinks” doesnt matter.

The court’s finding was no rapeee!

Sorry Charlie, Starkist is for tunas that taste good.

Oh, so this is the brilliant legal argument you’re hanging your hat on? That Trump didn’t rape E. Jean Carroll because ABC settled a separate defamation case where a reporter called him a "rapist"? Seriously?

Let’s break it down so even your knot hole can follow:

1. Trump was found liable by a jury for sexual abuse and defamation—and ordered to pay over $88 million. That’s not innocence. That’s a legal beatdown.
   The only reason “rape” didn’t stick in that trial was due to New York's specific definition requiring penetration. So yeah—he sexually assaulted her. The court said so. He lost. Full stop.
2. The ABC case was about a word, not the facts of the assault. ABC settled. Not because Trump was innocent, but because fighting a lawsuit over a single word in a broadcast isn’t worth the time or money when you’ve got a billion-dollar merger hanging in the balance. Welcome to corporate pragmatism. That’s not vindication—it’s business.
3. If Trump actually wanted to prove his innocence, he’d push those cases to trial. But he doesn’t. He settles or delays, then runs to the camera yelling “I WON!” like a kid who quit the game mid-round and claimed victory.
4. Reminder: Trump has a history of paying off lawsuits before they go to court—because discovery, depositions, and under-oath questions are his kryptonite.
5. And you can tell even he doesn’t believe his own hype. After the ABC money hit his pocket, what did he do? He shut up. No follow-up case, no "I’ve been vindicated" tour. Because he knows that $88 million verdict still looms over him like a bad haircut.

So no, the ABC settlement doesn’t prove he didn’t assault Carroll. It proves ABC didn’t want to burn time in court over a technicality. That’s all.

But hey, if you’re dead-set on confusing legal strategy with moral innocence, carry on. Just don’t be surprised when the rest of us keep calling him what he is: a sexual predator, a felon, and a danger to democracy—with receipts, court transcripts, and jury verdicts to prove it.

Now… you were saying something about "proof"?

 

[dmallord]

She ( E Jean ) accused him of rape and a jury would not have any of it.



This will shed some light on the Bragg /Merchan case.

"If I may be blunt..." the testimony given is opinion, not fact, and he explicitly says so. End of discussion.

Until an appeal determines otherwise, the verdict stands. Any lawyer knows that.

 

[Lance_Castro]

Poor Duck.

Try reading it again, Quacker.

“The jury found that he did not rape e jean carroll as per the legal definition of rape in new york state.

That’s what happened and that’s what matters.

What ducky or kaplan or stephanopolous or butters or anyone else “thinks” doesnt matter.”

 

[Rebel5soul]

Poor Duck.

Try reading it again, Quacker.

“The jury found that he did not rape e jean carroll as per the legal definition of rape in new york state.

That’s what happened and that’s what matters.

What ducky or kaplan or stephanopolous or butters or anyone else “thinks” doesnt matter.”

In their world "belief" trumps reality.....................it's a fucking cult.

 

[Lance_Castro]

View this content on Instagram

View this content on Instagram