Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
Well, since you asked so nicely.![]()
unresponsive
show us
its OK
We'll wait
(but not for long)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, since you asked so nicely.![]()
Is that truly the first idea you had on the subject? Disappointing.
"I've decided it is best to give other leaders in the party the opportunity."
With the presumptive nominee out of the race, I imagine a Hunger Games scenario among the field of Republican candidates as they attempt to out-do each other with rhetoric that will drag the entire Party further to the right.
Discuss.
I asked because the same OP is on the GB ,with the number of alts on the site it was a genuine question .
I'm still hoping for a Palin/Bachmann ticket. I would think every freaking comedian who speaks English, as well as Comedy Central and comedy clubs across the nation, not to mention producers of 'reality tv' shows would chip in a few bucks just to make sure it happened.Well, true to form the Wall Street faction of the Republican party has decided upon their candidate early. This year it will be Jeb Bush. Mitt Romney obviously got the message.
What's going to be very interesting is who will be his competitor from the whackadoodle faction.
- Paul Ryan? Not getting much traction.
- "Doctor" Ben Carson? A gaffe every week.
- Scott Walker? His disgust with minorities plays well in 98% white Wisconsin, not so well elsewhere.
- Bobby Jindal? He's trying very hard to be the "Christian" candidate.
I think we're going to see the usual bloodbath in LooneyTunesNation, even with fewer primaries for Vetty to pretend he's seen.
Don't forget the pediatric neurosurgeon, Dr. Ben Carson.
He's anti-Big Government, love this guy!
http://www.wnd.com/files/2014/05/ben-carson.jpg
The GOP is finding itself in the awkward position of being lead into 2016 by the social conservatives. Romney stepping aside is evidence of the capitulation to the TEA/Christian Coalition.
He has effectively said "Let them eat Bush".
And a fine Christian Bobby Jindal is, too.Well, true to form the Wall Street faction of the Republican party has decided upon their candidate early. This year it will be Jeb Bush. Mitt Romney obviously got the message.
What's going to be very interesting is who will be his competitor from the whackadoodle faction.
- Paul Ryan? Not getting much traction.
- "Doctor" Ben Carson? A gaffe every week.
- Scott Walker? His disgust with minorities plays well in 98% white Wisconsin, not so well elsewhere.
- Bobby Jindal? He's trying very hard to be the "Christian" candidate.
I think we're going to see the usual bloodbath in LooneyTunesNation, even with fewer primaries for Vetty to pretend he's seen.
http://www.mediaite.com/online/bobby-jindal-on-muslim-americans-thats-not-immigration-its-invasion/“They want to use our freedoms to undermine that freedom in the first place,” Jindal said later of Muslim immigrants. “If they want to come here and they want to set up their own culture and values that’s not immigration, that’s really invasion if you’re honest about it,” he said.
Well, true to form the Wall Street faction of the Republican party has decided upon their candidate early. This year it will be Jeb Bush. Mitt Romney obviously got the message.
What's going to be very interesting is who will be his competitor from the whackadoodle faction.
- Paul Ryan? Not getting much traction.
- "Doctor" Ben Carson? A gaffe every week.
- Scott Walker? His disgust with minorities plays well in 98% white Wisconsin, not so well elsewhere.
- Bobby Jindal? He's trying very hard to be the "Christian" candidate.
I think we're going to see the usual bloodbath in LooneyTunesNation, even with fewer primaries for Vetty to pretend he's seen.
Well, true to form the Wall Street faction of the Republican party has decided upon their candidate early. This year it will be Jeb Bush. Mitt Romney obviously got the message.
What's going to be very interesting is who will be his competitor from the whackadoodle faction.
- Paul Ryan? Not getting much traction.
- "Doctor" Ben Carson? A gaffe every week.
- Scott Walker? His disgust with minorities plays well in 98% white Wisconsin, not so well elsewhere.
- Bobby Jindal? He's trying very hard to be the "Christian" candidate.
I think we're going to see the usual bloodbath in LooneyTunesNation, even with fewer primaries for Vetty to pretend he's seen.
Well, true to form the Wall Street faction of the Republican party has decided upon their candidate early. This year it will be Jeb Bush. Mitt Romney obviously got the message.
What's going to be very interesting is who will be his competitor from the whackadoodle faction.
- Paul Ryan? Not getting much traction.
- "Doctor" Ben Carson? A gaffe every week.
- Scott Walker? His disgust with minorities plays well in 98% white Wisconsin, not so well elsewhere.
- Bobby Jindal? He's trying very hard to be the "Christian" candidate.
I think we're going to see the usual bloodbath in LooneyTunesNation, even with fewer primaries for Vetty to pretend he's seen.
The last link, in particular, was written by a self-described "progressive" who is an advocate of the Marxist notion of Wealth Redistribution.
Walker also alluded to the expectation back in the United States that he would run for president, noting the media had described him as "bland" as a prospective candidate. "I'd rather be bland than stupid, or ignorant, or moronic," he said.
the DUMZ are already scared
they are hammering him cause he never graduated College
So republicans are Marxist now?![]()
There’s something quaint about the way Jeb Bush is trying to get around critiquing or endorsing his big brother’s disastrous presidency, especially when it comes to the unpopular wars President George W. Bush began and mishandled. It’s almost as if the commoners are trying to get him to gossip about family matters, and voters will understand if he’s too much of a gentleman to do so.
Asked by the Washington Post’s Philip Rucker whether his foreign policy speech next week would deal with his brother’s wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Bush wouldn’t answer:
“I won’t talk about the past. I’ll talk about the future. If I’m in the process of considering the possibility of running, it’s not about re-litigating anything in the past. It’s about trying to create a set of ideas and principles that will help us move forward.”
Does Bush really think he’s going to get away with not talking about his brother’s wars – or his tax policies or the surplus he spent into a deficit or the economy that cratered on his watch? And how will the Florida governor square the fact that he rips President Obama regularly – in 2013 he called him a “complete and utter failure” – with his unwillingness to weigh in on the presidency that preceded Obama’s?
While Bush is talking about creating “a set of ideas and principles” for his foreign policy, I hope journalists remember that he was one of just 25 signatories to the original “statement of principles” issued by the hawkish Project for a New American Century — alongside Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Scooter Libby, Elliott Abrams, Norman Podhoretz, Frank Gaffney and other card-carrying neocons. He didn’t sign subsequent PNAC declarations, but as a first-term Florida governor and son of the last president, Bush’s name stood out on that founding document.