SparkleFur
Looking at the stars
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2026
- Posts
- 1,187
Now, who's getting spanked...No need to be sorry. I'm just offering my (sometimes annoyingly Grammar Nazi) perspective. We all profit from looking at examples and breaking them down.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Now, who's getting spanked...No need to be sorry. I'm just offering my (sometimes annoyingly Grammar Nazi) perspective. We all profit from looking at examples and breaking them down.
You never said if you were on Team OC.
That’s what my cat does, when he sleeps all day, wakes up for a minute to walk around in circles and find a new position, and then goes to sleep again.serial comma
That's fair. I've never heard it called that. It's descriptive and gets right to the point. It does lose thatDefinitely, yes. But I prefer to call it the "serial comma" rather than the "Oxford comma." It's more universal and descriptive and the use of "Oxford" sticks in my American craw.
Usually it's the same position though, isn't it?? All that circling.That’s what my cat does, when he sleeps all day, wakes up for a minute to walk around in circles and find a new position, and then goes to sleep again.
It's also sometimes called the "Harvard comma," which, as an American, I like better than "Oxford comma." The odd thing about calling it the "Oxford comma" is that its use is preferred more strongly in American English than in British English.That's fair. I've never heard it called that. It's descriptive and gets right to the point. (But... it does lose that
jargon-y/patois romance.)
Or, the wombat non-comma: eats roots shoots and leaves. Punctuate according to your inclinations.It's also sometimes called the "Harvard comma," which, as an American, I like better than "Oxford comma." The odd thing about calling it the "Oxford comma" is that its use is preferred more strongly in American English than in British English.
Or, the wombat non-comma: eats roots shoots and leaves. Punctuate according to your inclinations.
Eats, roots, shoots, and leaves — a short yet complete Australian stroker.Or, the wombat non-comma: eats roots shoots and leaves. Punctuate according to your inclinations.
What? No Shatner Comma?As always, there is an xkcd about this.
Where's Shatner University?What? No Shatner Comma?
Where's Shatner University?
A land of Shatner infinitives?It's where no man has gone before.
There is an Oxford near Worcester so we can claim it. Just don’t give it to Harvard. The high school in Cambridge had better grammar instruction than that not so august institution.That's fair. I've never heard it called that. It's descriptive and gets right to the point. It does lose that
jargon-y/patois romantic flavor. But I didn't spell "flavor" with a "u," did I? So Serial Comma it is.
Oh, right, I know of that Oxford. Plus this is New England, after all.There is an Oxford near Worcester so we can claim it. Just don’t give it to Harvard. The high school in Cambridge had better grammar instruction than that not so august institution.
That is odd.It's also sometimes called the "Harvard comma," which, as an American, I like better than "Oxford comma." The odd thing about calling it the "Oxford comma" is that its use is preferred more strongly in American English than in British English.
Oh, thanks! I love xkcd !As always, there is an xkcd about this.
That is odd.It reminds me of "lift" vs "elevator." Like American English is more uptight. I think UK English tends to be more playful, with words like "telly." They're a lot more loose and familiar (as in intimate) with their language.
I hope this makes sense.
Did you ever see The Story of English? There was this isolated island where the dialect of English people spoke closely resembled Elizabethan English back from when the place was first colonized
I hope this makes sense.
You’re probably right but I always thought it was Twain.I think of American English as more direct, more simple, more journalistic. Americans get rid of some of the unnecessary letters, like the "u" in color.
British and American literary styles mirror their political histories. Britain has been around a lot longer; its history is messier and more tangled. It doesn't have a written constitution. Brits like complexity and nuance. It's a relatively small island with a million fucking accents. I don't think Londoners can understand the Scots any better than I can. The US is far bigger in size and population, but I can understand just about any American speakers, although some Appalachians and Cajuns might give me pause.
Brits are better practitioners of wit than Americans. They value it more.
America is younger. We decided one day to create a country and put the whole thing in writing and that was that. We like it simpler and more direct. We value humor over wit. If you want to get a primer on the American sense of humor, read Mark Twain.
George Bernard Shaw is credited with the observation that America and Britain are two nations divided by a common language. I don't know if he actually said it but I like the sentiment.
I am well aware of it and I have often used it... in lengthy nonfiction quotes (usually using the quoted author's paragraph breaks) that aren't quite long enough to indent and put into italics.
I would NEVER use that construction in a fiction piece merely to indicate a pause. Honestly, I'd have been as confused (and annoyed) as your commenter was.
There is a tendency for language to ossify amongst emigrants.Like American English is more uptight.
It's funny, isn't it.There is a tendency for language to ossify amongst emigrants.
Sounds reasonable. If it were unspoken, you would probably have started a new paragraph.It occurs during a briefing by a boss, and marks the point where she goes from her introductory statements to her more specific instructions.