RobDownSouth
Oh Look....
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2002
- Posts
- 75,423
It was built on previous court decisionsYes, it was a phantom penumbra only a liberal Justice could detect.
Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) which allow married folks the right to contraception without government permission.
Eisenstadt v. Baird (1972) which extended the right to contraception to unmarried folks.
Neither is one of your cherished "enumerated rights", so they're subject to Supreme Court abrogation at any time, right?
Just like Roe, no?
I know you're not bothered if they take women's birth control away, because that doesn't affect you personally.
What happens if the Supreme Court says you have no right to condoms though? How will you prevent infecting your partners with HIV then? Saran Wrap maybe?