State Dept. to Reopen Clinton Email Probe

My only hope at this point is that her security clearance is revoked and she is suspended from having another one for 10 years minimum. This would effectively end her presidential campaign, you can't be President of you have no security cleanace.

Security clearance regulations are almost completely governed by executive orders.

While they could suspend her clearance now, once elected she would get it back.
The president is granted access by way of election.... It couldn't be revoked.
 
I fully understood what you said and am familiar with the particulars. I would suggest that the term "near impeachment" is incorrect in that even Nixon was innocent until proven guilty. The house never had an opportunity to vote for impeachment as you correctly pointed out.

A most frivolous distinction. The impeachment articles referred out of committee and the sentiment of a majority of the full House which clearly motivated Nixon's resignation speak loudly and eloquently as to the "nearness" of his impeachment. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
A most frivolous distinction. The impeachment articles referred out of committee and the sentiment of a majority of the full House which clearly motivated Nixon's resignation speak loudly and eloquently as to the "nearness" of his impeachment. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

With that thought process, would you say that Hillary was recently nearly indicted ?:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
intent

negligent?


then NEGLIGENT HOMICIDE shouldnt be prosecuted

NO?

YES!

Jesus, you're dumb!!! The language of the STATUTE governing "negligent homicide" INCLUDES NEGLIGENCE AS A CRIMINAL ELEMENT AND SPECIFICALLY DEFINES IT AS SUCH.

Laws which REQUIRE a specific state of mind, must SPECIFY the state of mind REQUIRED.

Conversely, "strict liability" statutes require no particular state of mind at all. There is no such thing as "negligently" speeding. You can tell the judge you weren't aware you were speeding, but he is free to ignore that testimony and invoke the maximum penalty against you. Negligence is simply NOT a valid affirmative defense for driving at a prohibited speed.

Negligence most certainly IS a legally valid affirmative "defense" to a charge of perjury.
 
I have nothing to add, I'm just here to be near the Colonel, and to catch his pearls. :)
 
My only hope at this point is that her security clearance is revoked and she is suspended from having another one for 10 years minimum. This would effectively end her presidential campaign, you can't be President of you have no security cleanace.

silly

you KNOW that wont happen ever

Ain't that the truth.

The only sanction she will ever face is the people who vote.
 
Back
Top