BabyBoomer50s
Capitalist
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2018
- Posts
- 14,719
Not happening. Sorry.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not happening. Sorry.
How about including some of the occupied and semi occupied territories for Statehood? Puerto Rico . . .
How about including some of the occupied and semi occupied territories for Statehood?
Guam, Samoa,
Why not? Will the Senate Pubs filibuster it? That would be a very embarrassing hill to die on.
I sorta favor Wake, Guam, FSM, Marshall and area islands. If nothing else, it'd be bigger than Alaska and Texas combined in terms or gross square mileage.
Why not? Will the Senate Pubs filibuster it? That would be a very embarrassing hill to die on.
Why? D.C., as a state, would be guaranteed Democratic. Why would the Republicans ever back that. They never have. Giving D.C. statehood is not a new idea.
You paying attention? You think this is coming to the floor of either chamber this month? Next? Christmas? Jan? Feb? Spring in a midterm year. Get a clue.
Congress is preoccupied with budgetary matters at the moment. But that situation will abate long before the midterms -- and it is entirely possible that the filibuster will be abolished in the process, as it should be.
I have a long cherished dream, let's do a Brazil!!!
Build a brand spanking new capital smack dab in North Central Kansas.
Turn the worthwhile parts of old DC into a National Monument and give the rest of it back to Maryland.
In the new DC no residential housing would be allowed save the embassies. That will forever take care of dick wads living off the government teat clamoring for the vote so they can vote themselves more. It would also solve the "Washington" name problem. We could name it "Parasite City." (a nod to Axel there.)
I would strongly urge the State of Kansas to zone all the surrounding land for double-wide trailers only. The occasional tornado will make sure we always sweep away the crowds of lobbyists and other assorted thieves that will surely congregate there.
Another benefit would be, given the nature of Kansas Winters, Springs, and Summers, sessions of congress would assuredly be much shorter providing them less time to get into mischief.
None of that is an argument against it.
Those that live on the VA side vote in and get representation from VA, including state offices.
Do it, and who will be sovreign? The Governor? Congress?
The governor.
In order to comply with the Constitution (Article 4, section 3), Maryland would have to consent because what's now DC was originally part of Maryland. Congress would also have to consent.
The President and Congress will answer to the Governor?