Story rejected for AI?

[TheWritingGroup]

What I meant by proposition-->Example.

All threads in the Authors Hangout degenerate into complaints about Literotica Management. Just look at the one about short delays before approval!

 

[metropolinational]

Thanks, @TheWritingGroup, I don't think I use that one too much. But I learned something!

 

[RejectReality]

Nobody has the foggiest clue what the hallucinating clanker gets triggered by, how much is "too much", or anything else. If you get pinged for AI and didn't accept suggestions from some program that utilizes it, it's nothing but a crapshoot to try to "fix" it. The only way you can "fix" something is if you remove suggestions given to you by some program that utilizes AI to generate them and revert to your original wording. ( Or some variation that comes out of your head, not the program )

If you didn't accept any AI suggestions, you're basically screwed. There is absolutely no way to determine what the detection program is complaining about, so anything you change is likely irrelevant. You're just tossing shit at a wall until something sticks — if it ever does. Most of the crap that people are suggesting probably triggers the AI was itself probably generated as an answer to the question by AI somewhere along the way.

Cultivate multiple venues. Nowhere else can compare to Lit's traffic, but anything is > 0 if you can never get published because some program doesn't like you.

 

[metropolinational]

If you didn't accept any AI suggestions, you're basically screwed.

This is what it feels like! I think I might be screwed. Everything I am reading (none of which I had time for tonight!) says that everything that is good (IMHO) about my story is an AI flag.

 

[TheWritingGroup]

This is what it feels like! I think I might be screwed. Everything I am reading (none of which I had time for tonight!) says that everything that is good (IMHO) about my story is an AI flag.

I'm afraid that you're an AI. I wish I didn't have to be the one to tell you.

 

[metropolinational]

I wish I didn't have to be the one to tell you.

You are right to call me out on that. You expected to talk to a human here, and instead you got more AI. That's on me.

 

[metropolinational]

OMG!

I bit the bullet and rewrote 50% of the story from scratch and heavily edited about 70% of the rest. I resubmitted yesterday, and today I see that it will be published tomorrow!!

Thank you for, like, the 3 or 4 people who offered helpful advice and the dozens of people who offered no assistance whatsoever but instead argued with me endlessly about whatever. All of you, assuming there is a God and He has a mysterious and all encompassing plan, were, thus, helpful at a metaphysical level. Thank you!

So happy and excited to continue writing my stories!

 

[SkyBubble]

No one knows what triggers Lit’s AI detectors. Anyone who tells you that they do is dissembling.

I know of at least one poster here who thinks she does.

Now, there are things that tend to (not always, but usually) set off standard AI detectors. But nobody knows how similar or different Lit's system is. As you said, anyone who tells you that they do is dissembling.

 

[Luci_nerdy_kink]

No one knows what triggers Lit’s AI detectors. Anyone who tells you that they do is dissembling. AI detectors are super flaky and spew out false positives and false negatives as a matter of course. There is no simple issue and no simple fix.

I have a lot of experience in AI and programming…

No, I’m not a bot lol…

I’m just weird.

But Emily is pretty much 100% correct here.

All of it is very flaky, and the admin don’t mean to cause any harm. It’s just really confusing how to protect everybody…

Try to stay patient with them because… it’s a really complicated issue and video game developers have been failing to solve this for decades.

With multimillion dollar budgets… it’s just really hard to solve.

But I’m gonna admit it seems like the easiest problem in the world… especially for somebody like me… it’s just not otherwise I would’ve fixed it already.

 

[Luci_nerdy_kink]

Nobody has the foggiest clue what the hallucinating clanker gets triggered by, how much is "too much", or anything else. If you get pinged for AI and didn't accept suggestions from some program that utilizes it, it's nothing but a crapshoot to try to "fix" it. The only way you can "fix" something is if you remove suggestions given to you by some program that utilizes AI to generate them and revert to your original wording. ( Or some variation that comes out of your head, not the program )

If you didn't accept any AI suggestions, you're basically screwed. There is absolutely no way to determine what the detection program is complaining about, so anything you change is likely irrelevant. You're just tossing shit at a wall until something sticks — if it ever does. Most of the crap that people are suggesting probably triggers the AI was itself probably generated as an answer to the question by AI somewhere along the way.

Cultivate multiple venues. Nowhere else can compare to Lit's traffic, but anything is > 0 if you can never get published because some program doesn't like you.

Even that doesn’t necessarily work because I get flagged on work that’s 100% original. I don’t use AI to do anything creative (word wise, I do use it for audio and visuals sometimes)

I use it for other purposes so I can have more time to be creative

 

[MountainLakes]

In my 9-5, I write a lot. Avoiding verbosity while preserving grammatical standards and fostering clear communication are important in that world. But, apparently that is not the case in this one.

"Are you using Grammarly, ProWritingAid, Quillbot or similar software ..."

No, it was written in plain text on an old HP laptop. Oh, well. There are other venues.