Storylines/Genres you hate

[lovecraft68]

Cruelty, humiliation, violence, or exploitation in the story are the things I definitely don't like.

I can appreciate the occasional Burn-The-Bitch/Bastard story when the spouse is found having an affair and isn't cruelly rubbing the husband/wife's face in it. My latest work-in-progress is such a BTB/RAAC story. I don't like the violent retribution in response to such one-dimensional characters cheating their clueless spouse. But I can see the injured party moving on by taking everything they can from the cheater.

The problem with the February Sucks original was the way the wife dumped her husband in front of their friends at the dance on Valentine's Day to go off for her weekend with the lover. That was cruel and humiliating, with the "friends" effectively telling the husband "Yeah, we distracted you to give her time to get away, you pathetic cuckold," and RAAC in such a situation just seems unreal, forced, and a pathetic attempt to justify the wife's "agency." Such stories are IMO generously a 2. (I save the occasional 1 for objectively shitty writing and lack of any attempt at writing a coherent story.)

I think that the difference between a realistic revenge type story and "BTB" is akin to a reluctance story vs non consent. One has some of the flavor the other is just over the top nasty.

I read the original FS story, and I agree the wife was a piece of work, as were the 'friends' but the way I see it is it's not my story so other than having a general opinion on it, I don't see it as my duty to rewrite it to right some fictional wrong. I have a life and too many of my own ideas I can't get to and no time to fanfic other authors.

 

[yowser]

Not hate...by no means...Not hate...But I do pass by:
High school, college dorms, boyfriends, girlfriends.
'

These are fairly innocuous. Or is it that they are so rarely done well?

 

[lovecraft68]

Several people brought up humiliation as something they don't like.

Question for those who have. Do you include consensual humiliation in that? As in maybe BDSM style, or consensual cuck scenarios? Some people like being degraded I guess is my point, so is that a factor, or its no matter what?

 

[Lifestyle66]

Several people brought up humiliation as something they don't like.

Question for those who have. Do you include consensual humiliation in that? As in maybe BDSM style, or consensual cuck scenarios? Some people like being degraded I guess is my point, so is that a factor, or its no matter what?

I don't consider consensual sharing or swinging as humiliating or "cuck" stories. Those are "extra-marital FUN" when there's a balance in the sharing.

I don't like humiliation stories, even those where the spouse supposedly wants to be humiliated. I find such stories are exploiting someone's psychologically damaged past. It's like finding a guy saying "My mother used to make me wipe her ass after shitting, so have your lover force me to wipe his ass, too!" Writing such "erotic" stories, IMO is as exploitive as rape stories.

 

[lovecraft68]

I don't consider consensual sharing or swinging as humiliating or "cuck" stories. Those are "extra-marital FUN" when there's a balance in the sharing.

I don't like humiliation stories, even those where the spouse supposedly wants to be humiliated. I find such stories are exploiting someone's psychologically damaged past. It's like finding a guy saying "My mother used to make me wipe her ass after shitting, so have your lover force me to wipe his ass, too!" Writing such "erotic" stories, IMO is as exploitive as rape stories.

Fair enough except you're equating someone enjoying being humiliated with past trauma. That's not always the case. For some people its simply a fetish the same way some people enjoy bondage, some level of pain etc.

 

[TheLobster]

Damn, an entire thread devoted to kink shaming and virtue signaling.

Stay classy, AH.

 

[Cali_Love]

Plots that center on the theme of revenge. Yuck.

Lectures. Writers with deep seated opinions of whatever, pour it out of their character on the page (or forum), but it’s really lecturing the reader in a show of how smart the author thinks they are. Yuck.

 

[lovecraft68]

Plots that center on the theme of revenge. Yuck.

Lectures. Writers with deep seated opinions of whatever, pour it out of their character on the page (or forum), but it’s really lecturing the reader in a show of how smart the author thinks they are. Yuck.

It's only a lecture if the reader buys into it and I doubt you're innocent of this because no one is. We all put our personal feelings into our stories to some degree.

I don't mind doing it here, writing it, or reading it because at least there's a name attached to the feelings rather than the usual anon spew we deal with from the keyboard warriors in the comments section.

But they ghost here and that's why I troll certain things, to piss them off.

 

[Lifestyle66]

Damn, an entire thread devoted to kink shaming and virtue signaling.

Stay classy, AH.

Fair enough except you're equating someone enjoying being humiliated with past trauma. That's not always the case. For some people its simply a fetish the same way some people enjoy bondage, some level of pain etc.

It's not about kink shaming. The thread question is "What do YOU not like?"

In my case, it's more a matter of which way the power balance tilts.

Is the story presenting a balanced DESIRE by all parties involved to explore fun sex?

Or is the story using a one-dimensional character as the "victim" the others are exploiting?

I've read some stories with humiliation where the author tries to defend it saying "But maybe the husband LIKES to be forced to suck his wife's lover's cock!". Don't try telling me after I read the story that it's a kink some husbands enjoy. If an author enjoys writing and imagining such scenarios, are they enjoying BEING that sub husband? Or are they enjoying humiliating that husband FORCING him to be a sub?

I can appreciate that people have different kinks. But tell me WHY everyone in the story should be enjoying it. In February Sucks, WHY should I enjoy or appreciate that the husband was dumped by his Loving Wife on Valentine's Day? In that story, the husband obviously didn't enjoy it, so it was a tragedy, and not fun. And it may be somebody's kink to dump their husband that way. But I don't have to "like" it.

So, it's effectively that I do not "like" non-consensual situations. ANYONE forced to do something they do not want to do, to me, is not a fun erotic story. Those are tragedies, and I can appreciate it if it's presented as a tragedy. I've written my own tragedy stories with the "Aftermath..." ones, or "What Were You Thinking?" And my current work will be another BTB/RAAC tragedy.

I can "like" tragedies. But don't try to disguise it as a fun kink, when it's damaging another person. With humiliation, did the author build the character as WANTING to be humiliated? Or is that one a one-dimensional prop/victim BEING humiliated by others?

 

[Rob_Royale]

Not hate...by no means...Not hate...But I do pass by High sschool

Same here. I can't get my head around school age kids in erotica, 18 or no.

 

[Lifestyle66]

...
I read the original FS story, and I agree the wife was a piece of work, as were the 'friends' but the way I see it is it's not my story so other than having a general opinion on it, I don't see it as my duty to rewrite it to right some fictional wrong. I have a life and too many of my own ideas I can't get to and no time to fanfic other authors.

The original "February Sucks" and "Just Once, If You Don't Mind" stories are author challenges.

Laurel has the scheduled author challenges such as Pink Orchid or Geek Pride, where they challenge you to write stories within their boundaries or themes. And even in the AH, some have started chain stories, inviting you to write additional material based on the initial setup.

In those two Loving Wives stories, those authors created their initial setup with the scenario and characters, and they left it without an ending, inviting other authors to finish the story their way. It's a challenge: "GIVEN the way this husband and wife interacted; how would you see the outcome?" It's just not the AH or Laurel/site supported type of challenge. They're not asking you to rewrite or fix THEIR story, but rather to finish it as is.

 

[lovecraft68]

"But maybe the husband LIKES to be forced to suck his wife's lover's cock!". Don't try telling me after I read the story that it's a kink some husbands enjoy. If an author enjoys writing and imagining such scenarios, are they enjoying BEING that sub husband? Or are they enjoying humiliating that husband FORCING him to be a sub?

Newsflash, there are men who are into this. On their own, with no one forcing them. Back in my days of Adult Friend Finder I met more than a couple of them.

If you don't like a trope, that's what this thread is about, but you're taking it further with the "and don't tell me..."

Your issue is because you don't like it, and you can't understand how someone else does, you have decided its not real and we get back to the 'evil woman' propaganda you and yours are always slinging.

Ever occur to you that there are men out there who think people like you who are into swinging/sharing are cucks? That to them no 'real man' could share? Swinging is wrong in every way? But yet you can embrace that, But here you are saying the same thing about something that other people are into.

Your ways are not everyone's ways.

 

[lovecraft68]

The original "February Sucks" and "Just Once, If You Don't Mind" stories are author challenges.

Laurel has the scheduled author challenges such as Pink Orchid or Geek Pride, where they challenge you to write stories within their boundaries or themes. And even in the AH, some have started chain stories, inviting you to write additional material based on the initial setup.

In those two Loving Wives stories, those authors created their initial setup with the scenario and characters, and they left it without an ending, inviting other authors to finish the story their way. It's a challenge: "GIVEN the way this husband and wife interacted; how would you see the outcome?" It's just not the AH or Laurel/site supported type of challenge. They're not asking you to rewrite or fix THEIR story, but rather to finish it as is.

Well before the FS challenge, people were ripping the story off without permission. That's my point.

I'll also stick to my point that a real author doesn't need to rehash another person's stories they can do their own and an actual man isn't offended and unmanned by what a make believe woman does.

 

[Lifestyle66]

Newsflash, there are men who are into this. On their own, with no one forcing them. Back in my days of Adult Friend Finder I met more than a couple of them.

If you don't like a trope, that's what this thread is about, but you're taking it further with the "and don't tell me..."

Your issue is because you don't like it, and you can't understand how someone else does, you have decided its not real and we get back to the 'evil woman' propaganda you and yours are always slinging.

Ever occur to you that there are men out there who think people like you who are into swinging/sharing are cucks? That to them no 'real man' could share? Swinging is wrong in every way? But yet you can embrace that, But here you are saying the same thing about something that other people are into.

Your ways are not everyone's ways.

Re-read what I wrote.

I didn't say "Men don't like humiliation."

I said "Don't just throw a one-dimensional prop in there expecting me to like it. BUILD the character and tell me WHY he likes it!"

If you read through my "Lifestyle..." series, I explain why both the husband and wife are into their kink. They started their relationship effectively as "friends with benefits" and realizing that they both come from "fucked up families".

EDIT: To my lifestyle swinging MCs, sex is not about love and marriage. Sex is what these two BFFs do together ... and separately with others.

 

[M_K_Babalon]

Damn, an entire thread devoted to kink shaming and virtue signaling.

Stay classy, AH.

The threads about what we don't like. If it's a kink, it's a kink. We're allowed to not like it. Kink shaming is a bit more than "I don't like [this], personally."

 

[Lifestyle66]

The threads about what we don't like. If it's a kink, it's a kink. We're allowed to not like it. Kink shaming is a bit more than "I don't like [this], personally."

The threads asks; "What do YOU not like?"

Kink shaming is more like "Nobody should like [this]!!!"

There are a lot of kinks. But if you want me to "like" one in a story, explain to me WHY I should. If something is just thrown into a story for the shock value, ... well, expect some people to react as "shocked".

 

[SimonDoom]

The threads asks; "What do YOU not like?"

Kink shaming is more like "Nobody should like [this]!!!"

There are a lot of kinks. But if you want me to "like" one in a story, explain to me WHY I should. If something is just thrown into a story for the shock value, ... well, expect some people to react as "shocked".

It can be a fine line, but I agree. It's perfectly OK to have a discussion in which people say what they don't like and explain why. It begins to cross the line into shaming when people express incredulity that anyone else can think differently, or that someone is bad for doing so.

 

[gunhilltrain]

Scat. Just not sexy or anything but repugnant for me.

-Annie

I had thought that it was banned by Lit, but I don't see it in the content guidelines.

https://www.literotica.com/resources/content-guidelines

I think there is another site that does ban it, but I can't go through all of their policies right now.

 

[LiterallyLiterate]

I enjoy incest stories between siblings/cousins, actually working on just such a story now, but to me, the concept of generational incest is a complete no-go. The power dynamic of an adult and a younger relative, son/daughter/niece/nephew is an absolute deal breaker. I have quit reading numerous stories I enjoyed up until the point where suddenly the mom or dad gets involved.

 

[ElectricBlue]

I had thought that it was banned by Lit, but I don't see it in the content guidelines.

https://www.literotica.com/resources/content-guidelines

I think there is another site that does ban it, but I can't go through all of their policies right now.

There's a whole sub-genre here of lesbian scat, specifically "barrel scat", featuring... figure it out for yourself.

I discovered it after someone faved a story of mine which briefly contemplated Russian girls who shit in the woods - a bizarre enough fetish, but hey, what's a kink if you don't open your mind? Anyway, someone faves the story, I go take a look at their story list, because there's at least something in common.

She's got a dozen or so stories of her own, and I see there's a common theme. And a list of maybe twenty faved authors, very similar themes.

It's an obscure kink. I didn't go looking for more, and I've never done a story search. Someone will now, I'm sure - I have no idea what they'll find.

 

[lovecraft68]

I had thought that it was banned by Lit, but I don't see it in the content guidelines.

https://www.literotica.com/resources/content-guidelines

I think there is another site that does ban it, but I can't go through all of their policies right now.

I thought it was not allowed here as well. But as many threads have proved, nothing is really banned here. Some stories may get the "for appearances' boot for being crazy over the top, but nothing here is that strictly enforced.

 

[Kelliezgirl]

Several people brought up humiliation as something they don't like.

Question for those who have. Do you include consensual humiliation in that? As in maybe BDSM style, or consensual cuck scenarios? Some people like being degraded I guess is my point, so is that a factor, or its no matter what?

I do, the fact that I don't like it isn't some kind of judgement on the act itself or the people who enjoy it.

I think Pepsi tastes terrible, doesn't matter to me one bit if you drink it by the gallon. I don't enjoy it so I will drink something else.

 

[lovecraft68]

I do, the fact that I don't like it isn't some kind of judgement on the act itself or the people who enjoy it.

I think Pepsi tastes terrible, doesn't matter to me one bit if you drink it by the gallon. I don't enjoy it so I will drink something else.

I don't think you'd remember the old commercials with the Coke and Pepsi challenge where people would be blind folded and have to pick which was which. To this day I don't know how anyone cannot tell them apart.

 

[Kelliezgirl]

I don't think you'd remember the old commercials with the Coke and Pepsi challenge where people would be blind folded and have to pick which was which. To this day I don't know how anyone cannot tell them apart.

Just checked them out on YouTube. That's too funny... you're right, can't imagine someone couldn't tell.

 

[TheWritingGroup]

I had thought that it was banned by Lit, but I don't see it in the content guidelines.

https://www.literotica.com/resources/content-guidelines

I think there is another site that does ban it, but I can't go through all of their policies right now.

I wasn't saying that nobody should post it, just that I don't want to read it.

-Annie