Vix_Giovanni
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2018
- Posts
- 2,102
This is a variation of the thread that ran a month or so ago where people said, "Oh, I don't like it when writers say, 'This is based on a true story'" as if that somehow makes it less worthy than fiction. Which is obviously bullshit. Truth is very often stranger than fiction, and anyway, how does anyone know?
Yes, I remember that thread and the OP’s request for feedback on a true story. I personally think that whether or not a story is true matters very little since this is an unvetted self-publishing site. But I respect that an author might have personal reasons to let readers know her story is true.
But I think that there’s a distinct variety of gloomy, unsolicited criticism on Lit that doesn’t question or debate but merely dismisses; not only the details a critic is unfamiliar and/or uncomfortable with or simply dislikes—i.e., multiple orgasms or polyamory or “based on a true story” headers—but the author as well. I understand that it’s, in part, a pitfall of crowdsourcing and online anonymity and other multiple factors, but I nonetheless find its priggishness off-putting. I personally don’t give that kind of criticism much weight, and I think it speaks more to the critic’s lacking scope of imagination than a critiqued story’s surreality.