Systematic one-bombing and harsh comments

I can see the headline now "Stock boy at Dick's Sporting goods poses as secret agent on sex story site."

Maybe we can store our goods in that warehouse you work in and where you even now are stealing Internet time from your superviser rather than working. (Thought you were busy over on another thread welcoming a pedophile back onto the forum.) :D

(Such obsession for both of you to have to drag me into the thread. Glad to know that you both see me as competition you have to chip away at constantly to try to bring me down to your level.)
 
Last edited:
Maybe we can store our goods in that warehouse you work in and where you even now are stealing Internet time from your superviser rather than working. (Thought you were busy over on another thread welcoming a pedophile back onto the forum.) :D

(Such obsession for both of you to have to drag me into the thread. Glad to know that you both see me as competition you have to chip away at constantly to try to bring me down to your level.)

So....you claim I am obsessed with you, but you are following my posts in other threads?

Way to make yourself look like a fool.

By the way do you have proof of said pedophilia? Other than some people feel they should write as they will and not be constricted by censorship?

I would be glad to see your proof because calling someone a child molester is classless even for you.

Oh, and by the way....invest in spellcheck;)
 
So....you claim I am obsessed with you, but you are following my posts in other threads?

Way to make yourself look like a fool.

By the way do you have proof of said pedophilia? Other than some people feel they should write as they will and not be constricted by censorship?

I would be glad to see your proof because calling someone a child molester is classless even for you.

Oh, and by the way....invest in spellcheck;)

Then you have no idea who or what Amicus really is. Most of his early book have been banned from everywhere for underage sex at the very least. And i don't mean under 18 or even 16 but much younger than that.

By the way, spell check is two words so maybe you need to invest some also.
 
Yes JBJ, we all know you have nothing to add to the real discussion so you have to make it personal against someone or bring up Kitty pictures. Both prove just how much of a troll you really are as usual.
 
Amicus and pedophilia?

Well, you could have just read his posts here for years.

Or you could have been an eXcessica author when a major distributor canceled out all of eXcessica books because of the underage sex in amicus' eXcessica books.

Or you could have looked at the avatar he used for a long time here on this porn discussion board--what looked like a 10-year-old girl sitting on his lap. He, of course, said it was his granddaughter, which made it all "better" in his mind that he slapped it on a porn discussion board along with his posts on "romancing" young girls in posts that showed that he thinks the whole world should revolve around just him.

Or you can just read his posts here over the last day. Then if you had half a brain, you could figure it out for yourself, LC. IF . . .

Nope, LC, you just have a sick obsession with me and . . . just . . . can't give it up. You've tried over the last couple of months (my theory is that you went back into therapy to combat all your failures in life--your obsession with your sister, your failed first marriage, your failed business, your sense of failure at being stuck working in a warehouse and never going anywhere out of the slums of Providence), but you . . . just . . . can't give it up. Well, tough, old buddy.

And, speaking half brained, point out where I have jumped in on a snide comment on you out of the blue on a thread like you and JBJ have? And shall we go to all of the posts you have posted in the last month and see if I have followed you to them in an obsessive manner (like you do with me)? No, I didn't think you'd want to do that. This thread itself speaks for itself on that matter.

Think you, JBJ, and amicus make fine triplets, though.
 
Last edited:
This is one of a series of comments on some of my femdom fetish stories:

Enjoying it?
01/21/14 By: Anonymous
More likely he is in a panic about being bound so completely. With her panties shoved in his mouth and held in place by the scarf he starts to choke. The panties are down his throat tickling his gag reflex. Unable to warn his wife, he vomits. Unable to expel the vomit he asphyxiates on his own vomit and dies before his wife knows what is happening. When she reaches the Chalet and discovers her husband has died the Police are called. Discovering what she has done, she is arrested for involuntary manslaughter and spends several years in jail as the Judge and jury have absolutely no sympathy for her actions. How is this story working for you now?


Why the commentor has to write such long critiques of fetish, when (presumably) he feels threatened by the idea of being bound by women, is beyond me. Yet the same person (apparently - similar phrasing and sentiments) has put similar comments on a dozen of my femdom stories. If you don't like those stories why invest so much effort on comments? Why bother to read oggbashan stories at all?

Funny thing is how much your fem dom is mostly light bondage, much more playful and hardly hostile or vicious like some of the stuff out there. If he wants to troll because of content, maybe he picked you because he felt safer reading your stuff, but just threatened enough to reacted to it.
 
Funny thing is how much your fem dom is mostly light bondage, much more playful and hardly hostile or vicious like some of the stuff out there. If he wants to troll because of content, maybe he picked you because he felt safer reading your stuff, but just threatened enough to reacted to it.

It is odd. But he, presumably he, seems threatened enough to go to the end and comment.

Some others have been very angry that anyone other than a man could do the bondage. It seems to touch a nerve.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top