Netzach
>semiotics?
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2003
- Posts
- 21,732
Exactly, though my quibble was with the inherent contradiction between God being all knowing and at the same time the giver of free will. Yes, to all those who want to dispute me on this, I now know that Aquinas and others did a decent job of reconciling this contradiction but none of those arguments that I read later fully persuaded me. Besides, on a practical level the church never lived up to its ideals or its promise.
Oh.
Yeah, that is thorny. In my tradition this is where you shrug and go "and you should be able to understand the Mind of G-d anyway?"
I think if I'd gone to reform temple where people weren't so kooky with the sex roles BS, I'd be way more into it all. Probably be some kind of wacked out leftist female Rabbi by now.
I'm sorry this is a murderous hijack.
Something that really didn't get added much to the explanation for the OP is the notion of the Trinity, except by Chauderlos - as a passive observer this seems to be the major difference between Catholics, and the rest of the goyim. (hee hee) It's also one of the most notoriously hard to explain notions out there - it's one of those things that you kind of feel on a gut level or don't - either the idea that three things are one thing totally awe-inspiring makes total sense or makes you head back to Methodist services.
Also this Mary-as-intermediary thing is huge. Everyone else has her kind of off to the side, fainting by the cross or something. For Catholics, she's almost like having a lawyer go to God for you, God's much more likely to think it's worth listening to.
Last edited: