LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

The Alien Enemies Act - 1798

HisArpy said:
What part of "lack of jurisdiction" don't you understand?

The courts can argue and discuss whatever they want, it will not give them jurisdiction over a President's war powers. To argue otherwise means that the President is subject to a single judge's determination on how to deploy the military in a war theater.

It also assumes the President doesn't have sole Constitutional or Congressional authority to use the WPA or the AUMF.

Basically you attempt to insert the court as a figurehead over the President in violation of Art II.
Click to expand...

Personally, I’m glad the fake lawyer has returned to grace us with wrong information about the law.
 
The main takeaway from this debate over the latest example of DonOld’s corrupt, unconstitutional actions / behaviors, is that the RWCJ usual suspects are obviously going to continue to defend the indefensible (gaslight) in an attempt to normalize fascism. (See: Derpy’s weasel word vomit.)

That ^ is what we are dealing with / up against.

🤬

JFC

SAD!!!
 
The coordinated messaging on MAGA Twitter is impressive. You can see the talking point come out and then get repeated almost verbatim across multiple accounts. They switch some words out, but it's clear they're towing the MAGA line in a coordinated way.

The latest is "lete.get this straight....judges let Biden do xxx without question but now they block 47 from doing xxx within hours"

Can't wait for bB to chime in with this
 
ll74 said:
The coordinated messaging on MAGA Twitter is impressive. You can see the talking point come out and then get repeated almost verbatim across multiple accounts. They switch some words out, but it's clear they're towing the MAGA line in a coordinated way.

The latest is "lete.get this straight....judges let Biden do xxx without question but now they block 47 from doing xxx within hours"

Can't wait for bB to chime in with this
Click to expand...
You should get to know Rob better.

He also spends his days following this stuff across multiple platforms, thinking it’s important.

You probably have the same socks, too!
Lol
 
HisArpy said:
1. The civilian court has no jurisdiction over military matters or the use of military/war powers. Nor can the courts preemptively restrain the government from invoking a war powers act.

2. The TRO is void ab initio. The appellate courts will block the order. The judge needs to find himself arrested and jailed for multiple Federal offenses while the DOJ seeks an indictment.

3. The deportees were taken into custody by Venezuela police after the plane landed. Which means either the plane had offloaded the deportees before the court ordered them returned, or the Administration rightfully ignored the court's order. Or both.
Click to expand...
The invocation of the Alien Enemies Act is void ab initio. There is no war. There is no enemy, save Russia. A government does not declare war on a crime gang.
 
Politruk said:
The invocation of the Alien Enemies Act is void ab initio. There is no war. There is no enemy, save Russia. A government does not declare war on a crime gang.
Click to expand...
My gut feel is that this invocation of the 'Alien Enemies Act' is, at the end of the day, performative.

The true goal is to get the general public desensitized to the radical idea that the bedrock principle of 'due process' in the American legal system is subject to the fickle whims of an authoritarian despot.
 
Lance_Castro said:
You probably have the same socks, too!
Lol
Click to expand...
Hahaha! You jokester you!
Hilarious! Here I am minding my own business and you make me have an image of RDS and ll74 wearing the same socks! Where do you come up with these comedic gems?! No. Seriously. You’re soooo funny. 💩🙄
 
HisArpy said:
A lack of jurisdiction is a lack of jurisdiction. The civilian courts can pound sand and get the same end result because the courts cannot preemptively restrain the gov nor enjoin the use of war powers.
Click to expand...
Of course the courts can do all of that.
 
ll74 said:
Your fixations are fun to watch in real time. Always targeted at specific users ...as if you have a victimhood history with them.
Click to expand...

Should i just speak in more general terms?

“ rob’s sock puppets are triggering nicely today”

Lol
 
Lance_Castro said:
Should i just speak in more general terms?

“ rob’s sock puppets are triggering nicely today”

Lol
Click to expand...
You already display your fixations plain as day. However you need to blame it on others is always a fun trip.
 
 
HisArpy said:
1. The civilian court has no jurisdiction over military matters or the use of military/war powers. Nor can the courts preemptively restrain the government from invoking a war powers act.
Click to expand...
Interesting... I don't know enough about American law to have an opinion on this, but it's an angle that hadn't occurred to me.
RobDownSouth said:
My gut feel is that this invocation of the 'Alien Enemies Act' is, at the end of the day, performative.
Click to expand...
This was my immediate thought. Politicians 🤷‍♀️
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

butters
another day, another 'unlawful' decision about trump's antics
Replies
23
Views
733
Saint_Ann
Saint_Ann
R
Round'em up,
10 11 12
Replies
283
Views
4K
Rotadom
Rotadom
P
Federal Judge: Government can’t rely on Alien Enemy Act to deport Venezuelans
Replies
1
Views
189
Politruk
P
P
Gabbard fires intelligence officials who contradict Trump regarding Venezuelan gangs
Replies
12
Views
379
Rebel5soul
R
W
NOTHING the U.S. ever did to tighten up on immigration seems like a good idea now
Replies
6
Views
35
ll74
ll74
Back
Top