The answer to socialism

Titles thread "answer to socialism"

Posts a picture where it's literally showing socialism but is mislabeled as capitalism

You can't be much faster at showing how stupid you are than that

No, you're just too stupid to understand the point.

In the first two frames the viewers cheat and uncomfortably peer over a fence at a game they should pay to see.

In the last frame the paid for their tickets and they're enjoying the game from comfortable seats.
 
No, you're just too stupid to understand the point.

In the first two frames the viewers cheat and uncomfortably peer over a fence at a game they should pay to see.

In the last frame the paid for their tickets and they're enjoying the game from comfortable seats.
No, you're just apparently too stupid to actually see what it's showing.

There is no cheating. The first two frames show people who cannot afford tickets.

The third frame shows where everyone can afford to have tickets and no one is left out because of lack finances.
 
The third frame shows where everyone can afford to have tickets and no one is left out because of lack finances.
It's always that way. If a poor person is down on his luck and struggles to buy groceries, or can't get paid a decent wage, then the capitalists just say, "suck it up, you don't deserve charity," but when a big bank is declared "too big to fail" the rich shareholders are bailed out by a generous government.

Socialism for the rich, law of the jungle for the poor.
 
Simplistic and just wrong. There are a whole host of social services people can and do get.
Many banks indeed fail, those that are bailed out take a huge haircut.
Your thought process is infused with hate and not credible.
Here is the list, https://www.fdic.gov/bank-failures/failed-bank-list
When a bank fails, tens of thousands if not more are impacted, so bailouts are warranted
 
Do an AI search on consequences of bank failures and see how the comment you made was childish
 
When a bank fails, tens of thousands if not more are impacted, so bailouts are warranted
Indeed. And so, also, with any big corporation. Or with a natural disaster. And so on.

Of course, if the shareholders of a failed enterprise (you know, the people who are supposed to take the business risk as well as reap the gains of stock ownership) are bailed out, that is socialism for the rich.

And the poor, well, they get capitalism!
 
Tell that to the Enron and Worldcom's of the world and Five U.S. banks were shut down by regulators during the 2023 banking crisis. The three largest and most prominent were Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, and First Republic Bank

Execs and shareholders lost everything. You are simple hate talking
 
No, you're just apparently too stupid to actually see what it's showing.

There is no cheating. The first two frames show people who cannot afford tickets.

The third frame shows where everyone can afford to have tickets and no one is left out because of lack finances.
It's a simplistic throwback to the old trope that all you proles need to succeed is to work a little harder, maybe get a second and/or third job, and you can rub elbows with the elites.

Pipe dream, not grounded in reality.
 
Francisco Franco rounded up all the socialists in Spain and shot them. He did not believe in democracy given he was an arch Catholic and a fascist.
 
There is no cheating. The first two frames show people who cannot afford tickets.

And they're peeking over a fence that was intended to prevent people from seeing the game for free. They're cheating. Something the fucking socialists always like to do. They steal what they can't create on their own or buy on their own.

Don't have a house? Just steal it from someone else.
Don't have a car? Steal it.
Don't have food? Steal it.

And soon enough you can take a wealthy country like Venezuela and reduce it to poverty.

Oh, but you'll say that wasn't True Socialism!

You plan to enact True Socialism and somehow a bunch of feckless fucks who constantly denounce notions of loyalty and morality are going to be trustworthy?

LOL.


socialist truth.png
 
He didn't shoot enough of them.
He was a fascist and Spain swung left in reaction to his death given his views on society were horribly dated. This is a guy who wanted to kill bulls every time there was a bullfight, by law.
 
Damn you are a huge moron
And they're peeking over a fence that was intended to prevent people from seeing the game for free. They're cheating. Something the fucking socialists always like to do. They steal what they can't create on their own or buy on their own.
The fence is not there to prevent people from seeing. It's to prevent people from entering. There is nothing that says you can't look.
And soon enough you can take a wealthy country like Venezuela and reduce it to poverty.

Oh, but you'll say that wasn't True Socialism!
Hey, the moron got something right. That was not true socialism.
You plan to enact True Socialism and somehow a bunch of feckless fucks who constantly denounce notions of loyalty and morality are going to be trustworthy?
True socialism requires more loyalty and morality than capitalism by far. Which is why it never happens, because people aren't good enough to do it
You haven't even come close to the truth yet, so your premise here is as moronic as you are.
 
He was a fascist and Spain swung left in reaction to his death given his views on society were horribly dated. This is a guy who wanted to kill bulls every time there was a bullfight, by law.

Spain swung left after Franco died because Franco didn't get all of the leftists and he also failed to expel the Marxist Catholic church from Spain.

Items to be remembered in any country that fights a civil war against the Marxists.
 
True socialism requires more loyalty and morality than capitalism by far. Which is why it never happens, because people aren't good enough to do it

That won't stop dipshits like yourself from trying it over and over at the cost of millions and hundreds of millions of lives.
 
Capital has better illustrations than what I'm seeing on this thread. The Buckeye State offers this illustration:

Ohio state officials awarded $242 million in signing bonuses to oil and gas companies headquartered in Texas and Oklahoma – Grenadier Energy, Gulfport Energy, Ascent Resources – to extract natural gas from below fifteen thousand acres of publicly owned wildlife preserves. The companies will also owe Ohio between 18 and 19% of their production.

The fracking royalty revenue flows into the Ohio general fund. The Ohio general fund funds Medicaid. Medicaid funds Prestige Healthcare of Louisville, KY. Prestige Healthcare understaffs its facilities and tunnels the savings to related entities. The same Haitian workers now threatened with deportation are, in many facilities, the very nursing assistants whose presence is the only thing standing between the current staffing level and outright abandonment of residents.

The understaffing machine and the deportation machine don’t run in parallel by coincidence. They run in parallel because both serve the same function: maximum extraction of value from human beings at the minimum cost of their reproduction.

In Capital, Marx identified what he called the ‘reserve army of labor’ – a vast pool of unemployed and semi-employed workers whose existence disciplines the employed, suppresses wages, and gives capital the leverage to dictate terms.

That is exactly what the above scene produces.

My question is, 'can anyone here critique socialism without capitalism being being and doing pretty much everything that Karl Marx said about Capital.'
 
When a new system is implemented in a country that calls itself socialist, all the leftists celebrate it. Then, after several years, when the economy is ruined and the regime starts to suppress opposition, it is explained that the regime was never really socialist. So socialism never fails.
 
Damn you are a huge moron

The fence is not there to prevent people from seeing. It's to prevent people from entering. There is nothing that says you can't look.

Hey, the moron got something right. That was not true socialism.

True socialism requires more loyalty and morality than capitalism by far. Which is why it never happens, because people aren't good enough to do it

You haven't even come close to the truth yet, so your premise here is as moronic as you are.
Greetings, TomTeacher19:

I don't recall our crossing paths.

I'm including this link to a recent exchange on this forum. I suggest that the reply indicates that the better path may be to disengage. See the response to the questions posed. And see my concluding reply to those exchanges.

Speaking only for myself, I prefer to let the record stand, confident that others will draw their own conclusions.

Have a good one!
 
Back
Top