The Barr hearing.

bellisarius

Literotica Guru
Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Posts
16,761
It's hilarious.

Paraphrasing;

Dem. congressmoron, "We demand the unredacted report NOW!!"

Barr, "Go pound sand."
 
It's hilarious.

Pubmoron: We believe every lie!

Dems: We know.
 
It's hilarious.

Pubmoron: We believe every lie!

Dems: We know.


Just because your buddies down to the pub are stupid is no reason to decry the lack of intelligence of Democrats.
 
My buddies down to the pub? Dafuq.

Yeah, you know that "pub moron" you posted about.

Or did you mean your post to refer to someone other than the moron you posted about? You know, your buddy "down to the pub".

Edited to add:

Perhaps, you're sufficiently illiterate to understand that when one uses foreign language idioms, one must expect to receive comments which include other idioms from the same foreign language?
 
It's hilarious.

Paraphrasing;

Dem. congressmoron, "We demand the unredacted report NOW!!"

Barr, "Go pound sand."

My buddies down to the pub? Dafuq.

Yeah, you know that "pub moron" you posted about.

Or did you mean your post to refer to someone other than the moron you posted about? You know, your buddy "down to the pub".

Edited to add:

Perhaps, you're sufficiently illiterate to understand that when one uses foreign language idioms, one must expect to receive comments which include other idioms from the same foreign language?

It's like playing cards with my brother's kids.
 
Barr thinks he’s Trump’s attorney. He will find out soon enough he is the attorney for the American public.
 
So your brother's kids can beat your ass at cards too?

Hey Timmeh, got another legal question for ya.

After the post-Teapot Dome scandal in the 1920s, Congress enacted a law that the Treasury Secretary shall provide Congress with the tax return of any federal employee upon request. No exceptions.

You went to law school, right? Legally, doesn't the term "shall" mean "without exception"? (as opposed to "may")?

Trumps attorney is claiming they have to ask Trump to see if he agrees to have his tax returns released.
 
Barr thinks he’s Trump’s attorney. He will find out soon enough he is the attorney for the American public.

A shame that Trump couldn't find somebody that knows what an attorney general is. Like, for example, a former attorney general.

Eric Holder is available. Oh wait... Eric Holder was the only attorney general who is ever been held in contempt of congress.
 
A shame that Trump couldn't find somebody that knows what an attorney general is. Like, for example, a former attorney general.

Eric Holder is available. Oh wait... Eric Holder was the only attorney general who is ever been held in contempt of congress.

or Lynch:cool:
 
Hey Timmeh, got another legal question for ya.

After the post-Teapot Dome scandal in the 1920s, Congress enacted a law that the Treasury Secretary shall provide Congress with the tax return of any federal employee upon request. No exceptions.

You went to law school, right? Legally, doesn't the term "shall" mean "without exception"? (as opposed to "may")?

Trumps attorney is claiming they have to ask Trump to see if he agrees to have his tax returns released.

Even the Supreme Court ruled that when the word "shall" appears in statutes, it means "may."

https://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/plain_language/articles/mandatory/

Sinclair v. United States, 279 US 263 (1929) @ 295; [Congress is without authority to compel disclosures for the purpose of aiding the prosecution of pending suits]

Watkins v. United States, 354 US 178 (1957); [...there is no congressional power to expose for the sake of exposure.]


More here;
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constit...ection-1/investigations-in-aid-of-legislation
 
I'm not surprised that your brother's kids are smarter than you are.

Must be vastly smarter than you then, Queball.

You really should swap some of your yuge! intelligence for something more than minimum wage.
 
Sinclair v. United States, 279 US 263 (1929) @ 295; [Congress is without authority to compel disclosures for the purpose of aiding the prosecution of pending suits]

Watkins v. United States, 354 US 178 (1957); [...there is no congressional power to expose for the sake of exposure.]


More here;
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constit...ection-1/investigations-in-aid-of-legislation


I gotta agree with giffy-boy here.
 
And now comes the media with their "Trumps hand picked Attorney General" meme.

LMAO, the others were selected by lottery?
 
And now comes the media with their "Trumps hand picked Attorney General" meme.

LMAO, the others were selected by lottery?

Oh look. Pre-emptive declaration of victimhood already. That didn't take long.

Stand tall for government coverups, NotIshmael! :rolleyes:
 
Oh look. Pre-emptive declaration of victimhood already. That didn't take long.

Stand tall for government coverups, NotIshmael! :rolleyes:

Rosenstein is "covering up?"

What is he covering up? Be specific.
 
Back
Top