The Big Fat Trio

[HisArpy]

I don't read or have access to the same search results you do. The legal analysis I read typically comes to differing conclusions. And you'd know that if you read any of the sources I provide for YOU to read.

As an example, pjmedia is a go to for you. I know they have shit journalists and writers. That helps me understand your position.


I do research for things i care about. Your analysis is different than mine.

And if you provide your sources, I can come to a conclusion based on the same thing.

But whatever.....I'll just stick with my "wtf are you talking about" and then you can tell me I'm lazy.

I'm not....you are.....but more power to ya. A fucking copy paste URL is not that fucking hard

Here's the point you seem to keep missing even after you've been shown the error of your ways:

YOUR SOURCES consistently end up wrong in their analysis and conclusions. Consistently and continuously they are exact opposites of reality and truth. Yet they're still your go-to.

The question is; why? Why do you go to sources of information which are almost always wrong? And why do you refuse to accept sources which are usually correct?

This is a YOU problem because a rational human being wouldn't do what you're doing. It also shows that your reasoning and analysis are suspect because they are both based in preference rather than facts and logic. Which is again a YOU problem because a rational human being wouldn't do that.

 

[Rebel5soul]

Well now, rumor on the street is that BIG FAT Letitia is in serious risk of being disbarred. How does a disbarred Attorney General serve the people?

 

[Politruk]

Well now, rumor on the street is that BIG FAT Letitia is in serious risk of being disbarred.

It's a lie. She's not.

 

[Rebel5soul]

Fact checks of future possibilities are worthless.

Oh, and BIG FAT Fanny is at risk of jail time.

 

[Politruk]

Oh, and BIG FAT Fanny is at risk of jail time.

Who is Big Fat Fanny?

Was she such a naughty nanny?

 

[MajorRewrite]

Fact checks of future possibilities are worthless.

Oh, and BIG FAT Fanny is at risk of jail time.

You seem to be obsessed with BIG FAT people. Is that an extension of your BIG FAT Trump fetish?

 

[Rebel5soul]

You seem to be obsessed with BIG FAT people. Is that an extension of your BIG FAT Trump fetish?

Not really, but it's hard not to notice traits that are held in common. Brains aren't a factor.

 

[Politruk]

I'm nobodies researcher or librarian. If you're too fucking stupid, or lazy, to look up the subject material don't bother posting.

Don't ever say "Do your own research." Only the most clueless laughable cranks ever say that.

 

[ll74]

The Elle Elle 74’s of the board share the common traits of dismissing others positions out of hand as if they held high ground by default, without ever articulating an argument of their own.

It’s cheap and telling, always good for a low priced chuckle.

Stupid people on the interwebs. Thank you for your service!

Lol

but butters didn't even get a mention? you're slipping boo.

 

[Lance_Castro]

but butters didn't even get a mention? you're slipping boo.

Poor LL haz sadz.

Lol

 

[Rebel5soul]

Quick update.

Big Fat Fanny and her entire office has been disqualified from the Trump et al case. I expect all charges to be dropped with extreme prejudice.

Meanwhile Big Fat Leticia is facing serious legal problems of her own including two complaints the the NY Bar. The case against Trump is undoubtedly going to be overturned by the appeals court.

Big Fat Alvin's case is still winding through the courts.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Quick update.

Big Fat Fanny and her entire office has been disqualified from the Trump et al case. I expect all charges to be dropped with extreme prejudice.

Meanwhile Big Fat Leticia is facing serious legal problems of her own including two complaints the the NY Bar. The case against Trump is undoubtedly going to be overturned by the appeals court.

Big Fat Alvin's case is still winding through the courts.

Oh good. This will be the catalyst to bring down grocery prices and stop the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the stoppage of Israel's genocide

 

[coati]

Oh good. This will be the catalyst to bring down grocery prices and stop the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the stoppage of Israel's genocide

You forgot making everybody rich in Amerika's Golden Era.

 

[HisArpy]

You're not fucking getting it. Posting a source isn't for education on a topic. It's to provide the perspective to others which you rely on to reach your conclusions.

So if I have an opinion, based on what I read or heard, I provide you the same thing I read or heard so that you can compare your reaction with mine based on the same source material.

It has nothing to do with being lazy or not doing the research. It's having a discussion based on the same context. I may know the actual topic of discussion but not have the same source material from which it is shared. And so the spin and analysis may differ..

I don't ask these things to be an ass....I want you to make an argument which can be based on the same material that I might reply. And yes, I might argue that your source material is biased or even shit (gateway pundit and PJ media are both consistently shit) but that is an argument based on the source material rather than your position

^this is why it's called a "debate" instead of an "agreement."

But here's the thing; you don't have an opinion on the subject because you don't do anything as simple as read a morning newsfeed. Instead you come here, throw shit all over the place, and then try to claim victimhood because you're too dam lazy to do your own research.

Re research; in the past, people used to read the morning paper over breakfast. They knew what was happening and could act accordingly. In that same vein, I read the newsfeed on my computer every morning over tea. It takes me all of 15 minutes to browse what's happening in the world and click on the stories that interest me. (Like this one) I also do a quick glance at it several times throughout the day to be sure that I'm on top of developing news. I'm sure that others do the same because they're clued up on what's going on.

You, not so much.

BTW, your attempts to slam the source rather than debate the issue is where you also go wrong. I could quote the National Enquirer and be correct about whatever it is that I's quoting, but you won't care because you think it earns you brownie points by calling the rag a rag.

Which refutes your argument internally since you're obviously not here to "debate" the issues, you're here to stir the pot and act like an idiot in public because it gets you attention.

Basically you need to stop acting like an assHOLE (because you're not an Ass like me) and get with the program.

 

[ll74]

^this is why it's called a "debate" instead of an "agreement."

But here's the thing; you don't have an opinion on the subject because you don't do anything as simple as read a morning newsfeed. Instead you come here, throw shit all over the place, and then try to claim victimhood because you're too dam lazy to do your own research.

Re research; in the past, people used to read the morning paper over breakfast. They knew what was happening and could act accordingly. In that same vein, I read the newsfeed on my computer every morning over tea. It takes me all of 15 minutes to browse what's happening in the world and click on the stories that interest me. (Like this one) I also do a quick glance at it several times throughout the day to be sure that I'm on top of developing news. I'm sure that others do the same because they're clued up on what's going on.

You, not so much.

BTW, your attempts to slam the source rather than debate the issue is where you also go wrong. I could quote the National Enquirer and be correct about whatever it is that I's quoting, but you won't care because you think it earns you brownie points by calling the rag a rag.

Which refutes your argument internally since you're obviously not here to "debate" the issues, you're here to stir the pot and act like an idiot in public because it gets you attention.

Basically you need to stop acting like an assHOLE (because you're not an Ass like me) and get with the program.

When the source is an article that copy pasta someone else's material and adds four "we all know" paragraphs beforehand...I'll slam it because it's shit.

If you can't provide a source of information about a topic you have clearly used to inform your position, then I mostly ignore it

I corroborate sources of information so I'm not relying on a single biased source...everyone should. I don't always follow up to the minute news as some have....but even I provide sources so others can see where I arrived here to post about it. I don't give a shit about "the old days".of people hanging out at the coffee shop and talk....this is the internet......everyone can easily provide a url.

 

[HisArpy]

When the source is an article that copy pasta someone else's material and adds four "we all know" paragraphs beforehand...I'll slam it because it's shit.

If you can't provide a source of information about a topic you have clearly used to inform your position, then I mostly ignore it

I corroborate sources of information so I'm not relying on a single biased source...everyone should. I don't always follow up to the minute news as some have....but even I provide sources so others can see where I arrived here to post about it. I don't give a shit about "the old days".of people hanging out at the coffee shop and talk....this is the internet......everyone can easily provide a url.

You're slamming someone's OPINION as invalid merely because of a source you don't like instead of debating that OPINION on its merits.

You lose. Every time.

 

[ll74]

You're slamming someone's OPINION as invalid merely because of a source you don't like instead of debating that OPINION on its merits.

I slam his opinion all the time on the merits.
I slam him harder when he doesn't provide sources for his perspective.

You lose. Every time.

How awesome for you.

 

[DeluxAuto]

^this is why it's called a "debate" instead of an "agreement."

But here's the thing; you don't have an opinion on the subject because you don't do anything as simple as read a morning newsfeed. Instead you come here, throw shit all over the place, and then try to claim victimhood because you're too dam lazy to do your own research.

Re research; in the past, people used to read the morning paper over breakfast. They knew what was happening and could act accordingly. In that same vein, I read the newsfeed on my computer every morning over tea. It takes me all of 15 minutes to browse what's happening in the world and click on the stories that interest me. (Like this one) I also do a quick glance at it several times throughout the day to be sure that I'm on top of developing news. I'm sure that others do the same because they're clued up on what's going on.

You, not so much.

BTW, your attempts to slam the source rather than debate the issue is where you also go wrong. I could quote the National Enquirer and be correct about whatever it is that I's quoting, but you won't care because you think it earns you brownie points by calling the rag a rag.

Which refutes your argument internally since you're obviously not here to "debate" the issues, you're here to stir the pot and act like an idiot in public because it gets you attention.

Basically you need to stop acting like an assHOLE (because you're not an Ass like me) and get with the program.

You're a long-winded idiot who literally fucks himself to hell because you're an ignorant dumbass.

You make an Ass of yourself and then blame others and claim to be a victim of your own dipshittery. Fuck off, Derpy.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

. Fuck off, Derpy.

Hey, now don't be too quick, he's one of a dying breed on the PB these days....an ignorant fool, who's willing to express this and debate it, long past the point any sane human would....

 

[HisArpy]

Hey, now don't be too quick, he's one of a dying breed on the PB these days....an ignorant fool, who's willing to express this and debate it, long past the point any sane human would....

Admit it, you'd miss me if I left. In fact you did miss me when I took some time away from lit recently.

 

[HisArpy]

You're a long-winded idiot who literally fucks himself to hell because you're an ignorant dumbass.

You make an Ass of yourself and then blame others and claim to be a victim of your own dipshittery. Fuck off, Derpy.

Yes, this is why I don't bother to post in troll. Like some...

 

[ll74]

Here's the point you seem to keep missing even after you've been shown the error of your ways:

YOUR SOURCES consistently end up wrong in their analysis and conclusions. Consistently and continuously they are exact opposites of reality and truth. Yet they're still your go-to.

My sources tend to be fox, OANN, Twitter and other things posted here by people. I usually dig into those sources to find the actual information because they bury it...but I do anyway.

Most analysis I utilize is from The Dispatch, Honestly and other conservative podcasts.

 

[Rightguide]

Wtf are you talking about?

Three communist clowns.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Yes, this is why I don't bother to post in troll. Like some...

You are the troll. An ignorant twat who spews wrongness while claiming to be a victim. That's you.

 

[ll74]

Three communist clowns.

I wasn't asking you