The Left Seems Ready To Concede The War On Guns

They sure sound like they wanna take up arms, LOL, could you imagine libtards even holding scary firearms, hahahhahhhahhaha
 
Both are probably your alts.
They're not. I reject Marxism. The socialist movement existed before Marx joined it, and would have been better off without the pseudoscientific intellectual substructure Marx gave it. All predictive theories of history are fundamentally flawed -- there are too many inherently unpredictable factors in play.
 
The 9th Amendment is literally meaningless.
The Founders included the Ninth Amendment as a safeguard against the idea that the enumerated rights contained in the Bill of Rights were the only rights held by the people. They understood that just because a right wasn't explicitly written down didn’t mean it didn’t exist or that the government had the power to infringe upon it.

Courts and legal scholars have interpreted the Ninth Amendment as a basis for recognizing unenumerated rights, such as privacy, bodily autonomy, and other fundamental liberties. See Griswold v. Connecticut as an example. Oh, and spend more time reading the Constitution for comprehension instead of the kind of ignorance you put on display here.
 
The Founders included the Ninth Amendment as a safeguard against the idea that the enumerated rights contained in the Bill of Rights were the only rights held by the people. They understood that just because a right wasn't explicitly written down didn’t mean it didn’t exist or that the government had the power to infringe upon it.

Courts and legal scholars have interpreted the Ninth Amendment as a basis for recognizing unenumerated rights, such as privacy, bodily autonomy, and other fundamental liberties. See Griswold v. Connecticut as an example. Oh, and spend more time reading the Constitution for comprehension instead of the kind of ignorance you put on display here.
That's only important to scholars. There has been no important case law turning on the Ninth. Even its application in Griswold is dubious.
 
Right the Ninth Amendment. Then take a nap.
9th The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Yeah that doesn't do what you say it does.
 
9th The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Yeah that doesn't do what you say it does.
Because you're ignorant. It could be saying a lot of things as courts have found in the past. If you combine it with the Property Rights (Fifth & Fourteenth Amendments) and the rights to Economic Liberty (Fifth & Fourteenth Amendments) the Ninth Amendment could be used as part of a broader argument for a right to farm.
 
Because you're ignorant. It could be saying a lot of things as courts have found in the past. If you combine it with the Property Rights (Fifth & Fourteenth Amendments) and the rights to Economic Liberty (Fifth & Fourteenth Amendments) the Ninth Amendment could be used as part of a broader argument for a right to farm.
No judge in the country would take that seriously.
 
Because you're ignorant. It could be saying a lot of things as courts have found in the past. If you combine it with the Property Rights (Fifth & Fourteenth Amendments) and the rights to Economic Liberty (Fifth & Fourteenth Amendments) the Ninth Amendment could be used as part of a broader argument for a right to farm.

I've forgotten more than you ever knew. I'm far from ignorant.

As stated above no serious case has hinged on the 9th which is just a stupid catch all. If we use the 14th as you state it makes a good case for how stupid your hate of Obama was. He was born in America. He was born to an American woman. Both qualify him. But now you're bringing up that him being a citizen works. Man you should step up your game.
 
Back
Top