JackLuis
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2008
- Posts
- 21,881
What makes you think you know what her individual role was in either Libya or Syria policy? There are a whole bunch of people who make up the foreign policy team. What gives you inside knowledge of her positions on these issues while SecState? Did some of her e-mails go to you personally?
And as far as the Iraq war vote, as noted ad nauseam before, A. she was the senator from the state of the Twin Towers; she voted her constituency and would have been lynched if she hadn't, and B. the vote wasn't what the carrion picking at her are depicting it as. The vote was to invoke war powers to give the administration permission to go on a wartime footing--it didn't approve how the administration actually went to war and it was based on made up advice on who they should go to war with.
It's seen as a bad vote mainly in hindsight based on a whole lot of information not given them. And it suckers an electorate who thinks it knows more than it does based on nothing in particular to misunderstand. I just wish she'd take the time to educate people on this. But of course they wouldn't believe her, because they don't want to.
Spoken as a true believer in the Beltway. Her remarks on the Libya and Syria situations and her lack of understanding what war means are enough for me to question her capabilities to recognize the consequences of her actions.
A war time footing means organizing to accomplish a task. GW just put a war on the tab because Rummy said he could depose Saddam for $200 billion. Well if it had been $200 billion to end Al-Q and end terrorisim, it may have been worth it, but to start a war is a crime no matter how you slice it.