Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is the above in some elaborate indirect way your effort to feminize society?OMG what an asswipe you are!
Hahahahahahahahaha!
Yeah... not even gonna make a new post for a dumbfuck like you...
Civilizations consistently last around a thousand years. They deplete their basic resources and become unable to sustain their populations. The founding philosophy and values fail as they meet new challenges. A notable exception is China, partially due to geographic isolation. It had a village tradition and resilience that limited the severity of collapse and dark ages, so it had faster rebounds back up to what we know as five thousand years of civilization. But the modern nation of China obliterated that village tradition in its phase of globalization, extreme urbanization, and industrial farming. The collapse there looks likely to be worse than the American collapse.Why are we in the final century of our civilisation?
Following a scientific and industrial revolution, any factors that might cause a civilization to collapse are entirely differemt from those that applied previously. And there is also now a floor below which civilization cannot fall, not even in a Road Warrior scenario.Civilizations consistently last around a thousand years. They deplete their basic resources and become unable to sustain their populations. The founding philosophy and values fail as they meet new challenges. A notable exception is China, partially due to geographic isolation. It had a village tradition and resilience that limited the severity of collapse and dark ages, so it had faster rebounds back up to what we know as five thousand years of civilization. But the modern nation of China obliterated that village tradition in its phase of globalization, extreme urbanization, and industrial farming. The collapse there looks likely to be worse than the American collapse.
This is the most incel thing ever posted on the internet bitch.Helen Andrews explains:
I don't think the world is going to run out of people anytime soon, unless of course Trump gets us all killedHelen Andrews explains:
Why don't you just switch usernames and respond using one of your other fourteen screen names then, Harpy dick.OMG what an asswipe you are!
Hahahahahahahahaha!
Yeah... not even gonna make a new post for a dumbfuck like you...
Not to worry. Right now he's making sure the IRGC is running out of people.I don't think the world is going to run out of people anytime soon, unless of course Trump gets us all killed
That sounds neat and modern, but it doesn’t hold up once you separate technology from the systems that sustain it. Industrial complexity creates new fragilities. A post–industrial society isn’t immune to collapse; it’s more interdependent. Power grids, supply chains, finance, digital infrastructure, and just-in-time logistics are tightly coupled. Disrupt one layer and the effects cascade. That’s not a higher floor, that’s a taller, narrower tower.Following a scientific and industrial revolution, any factors that might cause a civilization to collapse are entirely differemt from those that applied previously. And there is also now a floor below which civilization cannot fall, not even in a Road Warrior scenario.
Something tells me the USA will run out of counter-missile, counter-drone and counter-mine weaponry long before the IRGC runs out of people!Not to worry. Right now he's making sure the IRGC is running out of people.
The truth hurts, doesn't it, sweetheart?This is the most incel thing ever posted on the internet bitch.
With the Trumpy Tariffs, those supply chains are on the way out, at least for the USA manufacturers.. Modern production depends on specialized labor, global supply chains,
Watch the video, then emote.You're not making any new argument. It's the same shit you offered last thread.
Generalizations, cherry picking, sweeping gender stereotypes, vague definitions....all wrapped into your insecurities and demonstrated by your incessant need to bring up the same exact topic multiple times a week.
It's pathetic.
Feminism isn't ruining the world. Go cry to your mommy
I did watch the video.Watch the video, then emote.
That’s a remarkable amount of emotional projection for someone who couldn’t be bothered to address a single point. If this is your idea of an argument, I can see why you prefer character attacks; they’re easier than thinking. You’ve managed to diagnose my entire worldview without engaging a single idea. That’s certainly not insight, but it could be a somewhat yellowed belly dressed up as moral superiority. Don't ya think?The original poster seems to spend his days in a fog of hate and bitterness: Against women (this thread) against minorities and "Wokeness" (in countless other threads) against Democrats (too many other threads to mention) and against the environment.
If he wasn't such a demonstratably mean-spirited and willfully ignorant person I'd almost feel sorry for him.
Criticizing a set of policies isn’t “hating women.” That leap says more about your argument than mine. If you can’t separate ideas from identity, you’re not debating, you’re deflecting. But since you insist on using your imagination, imagine thinking that calling someone a name is a substitute for having an argument. Imagine being so short on substance that “you hate women” is your entire rebuttal. Imagine confusing disagreement with hatred because it’s easier than defending your position. Imagine typing all that and still not addressing a single point. Just imagine.Imagine hating women this much and somehow being on a porn site.
Imagine hating women this much and we're just over here hoping you go don't talk to us.
Imagine hating women this much and somehow, this country is facing rising prices, a war no one wants, a pedophile in the oval office and none of these are because of women. Go figure.
You will always be the most fem whiny bitch here, Jacquline.Criticizing a set of policies isn’t “hating women.” That leap says more about your argument than mine. If you can’t separate ideas from identity, you’re not debating, you’re deflecting. But since you insist on using your imagination, imagine thinking that calling someone a name is a substitute for having an argument. Imagine being so short on substance that “you hate women” is your entire rebuttal. Imagine confusing disagreement with hatred because it’s easier than defending your position. Imagine typing all that and still not addressing a single point. Just imagine.![]()
Y = # women-hating threads Rightguide posts per dayHow many women rejected Rightguide to the point that he feels a need to post a women-hating thread each day?
Maybe we can come up with an equation.![]()
DeluxAuto: where opinions on cars are optional, and delusion on everything else is mandatory.You will always be the most fem whiny bitch here, Jacquline.
You don’t even know what policies you’re talking aboutCriticizing a set of policies isn’t “hating women.” That leap says more about your argument than mine. If you can’t separate ideas from identity, you’re not debating, you’re deflecting. But since you insist on using your imagination, imagine thinking that calling someone a name is a substitute for having an argument. Imagine being so short on substance that “you hate women” is your entire rebuttal. Imagine confusing disagreement with hatred because it’s easier than defending your position. Imagine typing all that and still not addressing a single point. Just imagine.![]()
On the other hand, some people do bear an animus towards women, and that affects their ideas about policies, such as abortion or marriage law or equal treatment in the workplace or education or contraception and so forth.Criticizing a set of policies isn’t “hating women.”
Rightguide: When you need to be 100% absolutely wrong about the content of your own thread.DeluxAuto: where opinions on cars are optional, and delusion on everything else is mandatory.
Hey bro why are all your topics about women or people of color?Helen Andrews explains: