The Sad Fate of Democrat Women

[cjh]

He forgets his fore bearers, the three Klansmen, Truman, Bryd, and Black. Revered Democrats to the end. Not a single Democrat in the House or Senate voted for the 14th Amendment, over 90% of Republicans did however.

why am i not surprised that your take on history ends in 1868?

want to talk about truman and desegregation of the armed services?

shining example for those who dropped the don't tell don't ask policy.

 

[Busybody]

why am i not surprised that your take on history ends in 1868?

want to talk about truman and desegregation of the armed services?

shining example for those who dropped the don't tell don't ask policy.

stfu, with this BS

you don't GIVE A SHIT

 

[unregistered]

 

[Busybody]

why am i not surprised that your take on history ends in 1868?

want to talk about truman and desegregation of the armed services?

shining example for those who dropped the don't tell don't ask policy.

you are no better then the NIGGER....ZUMI

you are a RACIST and HATER

fuck off

 

[unregistered]

 

[Busybody]

she should be happy ANYONE texted her

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[cjh]

He's all about the effect of so called "Southern Strategy" that the author, Buchanan has already debunked as Democrat fantasy.

Buchanan!?!

Hahahahahahahahah

Stormfront's preferred presidential candidate.

White nationalists see Pat Buchanan as a mainstream champion of their beliefs. So when ColorOfChange.org launched a campaign last week calling on MSNBC to fire Buchanan from his role as a contributor and political analyst, white supremacists took to the Internet to rally around their prized public intellectual. Their goal? Make sure Buchanan maintains his position on a major cable news network so that divisive, racially inflammatory ideas continue to circulate in the mainstream.

To date, more than 84,000 people of all races and ethnic backgrounds have signed the ColorOfChange petition demanding that MSNBC -- an otherwise respectable news outlet -- stop elevating a contributor who regularly espouses white supremacist, anti-Semitic and homophobic views. But the community of commenters on Stormfront.org, a white nationalist site, have rushed to defend Buchanan, calling him "a real national treasure" and expressing regret that David Duke ("another honorable white man") isn't taken seriously by mainstream media the way that Buchanan is.

Here's more from the Stormfront community in support of Buchanan:

Stormfront member Tenniel:

"There have been NO mainstream leaders who have spoken out in support of the White race and White America. Now, finally, ONE mainstream White leader is doing so. This is a tear in the american jew matrix."

Stormfront member NationalCrusader14:

"I congratulate him for telling the truth. He is the only person on national television regularly with pro-white views. I know James Edwards and David Duke have appeared on Television/Talmudvision before but they do not get on very often because they are not allowed."

Tenniel would later post:

"His spunk is a fine example for all White folk. This is what White people in all walks of life need to do. Say their minds -- stand up for our people -- openly oppose the Genocide -- and refuse to back down OR APOLOGIZE."

Stormfront member allkesh:

"Good for Pat. I hope more pro-whiteness takes a hold & historical civil rights violations of society & the US Government come to light. David Duke is another honorable white man that should be treated the same by the media as Pat & other people!"

Stormfront member Spartan_WhiteKnight:

"I hope Pat Buchanan speaks as much as possible about the extremely anti-white and anti-christian ADL, including other kosher outfits that seek to destroy any White person...Amazing when you think about why Pat is being attacked as he is. That is, until one makes it a point to study jews and their organizations.

Stormfront member Tenniel contributed again:

"I very much hope that Pat does not allow himself to be intimidated by the jews and negroes into not going on Political Cesspool again. The White race NEEDS him AND MANY WHITE MAINSTREAM LEADERS to continue speaking up for his people. I would be VERY disappointed if he let himself be bullied out of doing so. It's absolutely absurd and incredibly COWARDLY that White MAINSTREAM leaders are not speaking up for the survival of themselves, their wives, their children, their future children, their countries, their civilization, their people, their own genetics.


If HUNDREDS of White MAINSTREAM leaders (politicians, television and radio personalities, writers, movie/television and sports celebrities) all at once simultaneously transformed into racially aware and patriotic champions for their own race (suddenly became vocal WN's) -- and spoke out strongly and bravely against the Genocide of the White race and White civilization regardless of the responses of our non-white anti-white PARASITES -- our people would awaken en masse -- and what could the filthy slimy bstard jew and negro and mestizo parasites do about it (short of nuking all of our countries -- or, rather, making our idiotic suicidal traitorous military nuke our own countries)? Nothing."

Stormfront member Brend:

"If MSNBC fires Pat, than they need to fire Al and half their staff. Frankly, their staff has been extremely bias against whites. Pat as an analyst doesn't even balance the bottom 1% of all the media bias against whites."

As these comments show, white supremacists are supporting MSNBC's efforts to keep Pat Buchanan in the mainstream.

Playing to his base

In an appearance last week on NPR's Diane Rehm show, Buchanan gave a nod to the white supremacist fringe that supports his work. He used the word "ethno masochist" to describe President Obama's mother, Ann Dunham, a woman who married first a Kenyan national and then a man from Indonesia. What may sound like a made up word to most of the world is actually used frequently in white supremacist and far-right circles. The top Google result for "ethno masochist" points to a definition of the word at a site called "Metapedia," whose front page helpfully informs us that "words like Nazi, anti-semite and conspiracy theory were all created by Jews as a means of thought control." Also on the first page of results is a link to "Skadi Forum" a "Germanic Online Community," and "Majorityrights.com," which describes itself as discussing "various issues related to the preservation of Western culture and the ethnic genetic interests (EGI) of people of European ancestry." So with the use of the word last week, Buchanan sounded a dog whistle that the white supremacist community heard loud and clear.

People nationwide understand that his recent missteps are just the latest in career built on stirring up racial anxieties and validating the worst fears and hatreds that some Americans hold. But it's just as clear to members of the white pride movement that if Pat Buchanan loses his perch on cable news, their community loses one of the few people who validate their extremist perspective in the mainstream. They understand that if MSNBC stopped providing him with a platform, Buchanan would be going on far-right radio programs and writing his books in obscurity. In other words, he'd be firmly in the margins where he belongs.

MSNBC's motto is "Lean forward." But in choosing to back Buchanan and his racially divisive ideas, they're proving they're not willing to practice what they preach.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rashad-robinson/pat-buchanan-msnbc_b_1068272.html

hahahahahahaha

 

[Busybody]

STFU with BS

 

[Busybody]

The latest action in the war on women: Column


Glenn Harlan Reynolds 1:43 p.m. EDT July 29, 2013


Recent scandals find politicians harassing women and embarrassing themselves.



Back during the 2012 election, Democrats were quick to seize on some Republican words -- like Todd Akin's remark about "legitimate rape" and late-term abortion, orRush Limbaugh's calling Sandra Fluke a "slut" for wanting free birth control -- to build the notion of a "war on women."

But if you look past words to actual deeds, most of the action in the war on women seems to be coming from the Democratic front lately. Just consider these cases:

First, Democratic San Diego Mayor Bob Filner. So far seven women have accused him of sexual harassment. According to one report, Filner said, "You'll have to excuse me for what's about to happen. It's your fault," before pinning a woman in a restaurant booth. Other allegations include kissing, grabbing and assorted other inappropriate behavior.

As is usually the case, this stuff was no secret within the world of San Diego Democratic politics, but even though there were complaints, the leadership supported Filner anyway until things went public. And even afterward, until the pressure became too great, Democrats supported him. As with Bill Clinton, and his alleged assaults on Paula Jones, Juanita Broddrick and Kathleen Willey, tribal loyalties to party kin outweighed any concern for women as a group -- or for the accusers as individuals. The accusers were tossed over the side until the publicity became too strong to ignore. Democrats -- like Hillary with Bill -- stood by their man, Tammy Wynette-style.

Then take New York. Please. New York now has the infamous serial sexter Anthony Weiner running for mayor. Unlike Clinton and Filner, the women Weiner was involved with seem to have been entirely consenting. Though the names involved (Weiner's online pseudonym was "Carlos Danger," and one of his virtual paramours -- a former Obama campaign worker and anti-Sarah Palinpetitioner -- went by "Sydney Leathers" though that, shockingly, is her real name) seemed like something from a 1970s porn film, the sexual contact involved seemed voluntary enough. It was just pathetic.

Even more pathetic was the fact that for Weiner this was the second time around, after giving up his congressional seat for, basically, the same thing in 2011. For Weiner, the "War On Women" aspect has more to do with the doormatization (Is that a word? It is now) of his wife, Huma Abedin. Long a star to people on the left, for reasons that Slate's Dave Weigel finds somewhat unclear, Abedin has stood by Weiner throughout, even putting on a rather embarrassing press conference appearance.

But now that her stand-by-your-man routine has gone from the possibly noble to the clearly ridiculous, even liberal writers such as The Atlantic's Elspeth Reeve are saying that "Huma has lost her halo." Indeed, even as Huma was delivering quotes for rehabilitative puff-pieces in People and The New York Times, it's now clear that she knew that Weiner hadn't been rehabilitated at all, leaving some to say that she's even worse than he is. People are even starting to ask about how Huma could work for the State Department while consulting for people who dealt with the State Department. Her future political career, previously bright, seems seriously tarnished.

As Gloria Allred's daughter, Democratic attorney Lisa Bloom, notes, Weiner's treatment of Huma could be described as a kind of spousal abuse. Well, whatever it is, it's not indicative of any particular respect for women. Weiner, meanwhile, seems to have been weirdly jealous for an online philanderer. Leathers reports: "Me being hit on by other men really upset him. We were Facebook friends, so he could see if men were commenting on photos of me, or telling me that I was pretty. Really minor things like that really bothered him." Uh huh.

Then there's former New York governor and attorney general Eliot Spitzer, better known as "client #9" for his extensive patronization of call girls. As far as I'm concerned there's nothing wrong with that: These were consenting adults, and if it were up to me, I'd make prostitution legal everywhere the way it is in Nevada. But even while patronizing call girls, Spitzer was also going out of his way, as attorney general, to see that they were prosecuted. It's usually Republicans who are charged with sexual hypocrisy, but this is first-rate phoniness.

The funny thing, though, is that in the press, an isolated remark by a Republican candidate or radio host is treated as representative of the entire party. The behavior of these Democratic officeholders and candidates, on the other hand, is treated as an isolated incident -- and in many of the national media reports regarding Filner, his party affiliation is omitted, or not mentioned until paragraph 12.

But do I think this behavior betrays a special contempt for women on the part of Democrats? Well, not really. I think it demonstrates a contempt for people in general, and especially for voters. But then again, why shouldn't they be contemptuous of voters? Look who elected them.

Glenn Harlan Reynolds is professor of law at the University of Tennessee. He blogs at InstaPundit.com.

In addition to its own editorials, USA TODAY publishes diverse opinions from outside writers, including our Board of Contributors.

 

[LiFeNdEaTh]

interesting..

 

[Busybody]

http://www.thenationalstudent.com/articleImages/Turkish_rescuers_retrieve_sex_doll.jpg

willingly so


as long as the BABIES are KILLED

 

[Busybody]

I know, lets talk BINDERS OF WOMEN!






Carney Defends White House Silence On Democrats’ War On Women…





Jay Carney Defends White House Silence on Democrats’ War on Women (July 31, 2013)

In other words, women, Obama is too busy to be concerned with you if the abuser is a Democrat.

Of course, Obama’s doing a lousy job on the economy too. The only thing he really does with religious focus is golf.

 

[BotanyBoy]

In other words, women, Obama is too busy to be concerned with you if the abuser is a Democrat.

Thank god REPOZ never did anything like that....HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

 

[Busybody]

Thank god REPOZ never did anything like that....HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

show me

I got time

I'll wait

 

[Busybody]

show me

I got time

I'll wait

so Bootay Boi, once again, like a 'person" with Tourette Syndrome

you scream

REPOZ

REPOZ

REPOZ

with no evidence at all

REPOZ

REPOZ

REPOZ

REPOZ

REPOZ

REPOZ

 

[BotanyBoy]

so Bootay Boi

1) no evidence of any kind would convince you of anything but R= seal of virtue.

2) EVIDENCE? Christ you must not read or listen to anything but Limbaugh.

3) I'll take the GOP and REPOZ seriously when they start walking their talk instead of talking out of their ass sideways and upside down "Liberty, freedom!! Limited gubbmint!! MURIKUH!!!" all 200% bullshit.

4) I'll take REPOZ seriously when they can pick a POTUS candidate who knows what fucking party he's in because the last few didn't get the memo, and the conservatives who do know what team they are on? Get called crazy....LMAO!!!

 

[Busybody]

You DIDNT answer the question, TOURETTE's BOI

 

[Busybody]

Thank god REPOZ never did anything like that....HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

show me

I got time

I'll wait

 

[BotanyBoy]

show me

I got time

I'll wait

1) no evidence of any kind would convince you of anything but R= seal of virtue.

 

[Busybody]

1) no evidence of any kind would convince you of anything but R= seal of virtue.

you DIDNT answer the question

YOU CANT ANSWER THE QUESTION

Tourette's Boi

REPOZ

REPOZ

REPOZ



REPOZ

REPOZ

REPOZ

REPOZ

REPOZREPOZ

REPOZ

REPOZ



REPOZ

REPOZ

REPOZ

REPOZ

REPOZREPOZ

REPOZ

REPOZ



REPOZ

REPOZ

REPOZ

REPOZ

REPOZ

REPOZ


REPOZ


REPOZ

 

[BotanyBoy]

you DIDNT answer the question

YOU CANT ANSWER THE QUESTION

I can't only in your little world....because no matter what I say, (R) = pillar of humanity and moral fortitude. Not even a confession on film would convince you....so what's the point?

 

[julybaby04]

All people mess up. Makes no difference if they are Liberals or Conservatives.

The difference is that the Liberals give it a pass. Conservatives have their feet held to the fire and are not allowed the "apology" angle.

Liberals are given the pass because the most of the media are also Liberal. They want "their" people in the places of power and will no longer be upfront and truthful about what Liberals do that is truly wrong.

That same media hold the Conservatives in those same positions to a much higher standard. They expect 100% perfection or else the coverage and destruction of that person will be ruthless.

The media drives this country. There are a few Conservative media outlets, and perhaps that is why Conservatives cling to those. People who disagree with the Liberal agenda know that there is not one "media" source that will be truly fair when giving coverage to any Liberal who has messed up.....there will only be cover-up or some sort of coverage trying to make what that person did shown as no big deal.

This country is completely divided. I doubt that there will EVER be a time when there will be consensus on anything any longer. The values of this country are split in two. The political parties prove that.

 

[BotanyBoy]

All people mess up. Makes no difference if they are Liberals or Republicans.

The difference is that the Liberals give it a pass. Republicans have their feet held to the fire and are not allowed the "apology" angle.

Liberals are given the pass because the most of the media are also Liberal.
They want "their" people in the places of power and will no longer be upfront and truthful about what Liberals do that I perceive as being truly wrong.

That same media hold the Republican in those same positions to a much higher standard. They expect 100% perfection or else the coverage and destruction of that person will be ruthless.

The media drives this country. There are a few Republican media outlets, and perhaps that is why Republicans cling to those. People who disagree with the Liberal agenda know that there is not one "media" source that will be truly fair when giving coverage to any Liberal who has messed up.....there will only be cover-up or some sort of coverage trying to make what that person did shown as no big deal.

This country is completely divided. I doubt that there will EVER be a time when there will be consensus on anything any longer. The values of this country are split in two. The political parties prove that.

Fixed some fundamentals of your post so you look less retarded, you're welcome.

1) there are VERY few conservatives in politics, and you sister would call them fucking CRAZY. You and 99% of the GOP wouldn't know conservatism if it bit you and the GOP square in the fucking ass.....you aren't even REMOTELY conservative. You're a US republican/Neocon and frankly semi fascist.

2)You say liberals get a pass but Republican's don't.......you must not watch very much republican media b/c they make shit up just to smear liberals and conservatives.

3) Sad thing is it works for the republican crowd.