Liar
now with 17% more class
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2003
- Posts
- 43,715
Not much point in reading further, is there?
B-b-but, it confirms my fears, so it MUST be true!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not much point in reading further, is there?
Not much point in reading further, is there?
How bad is the fallout from Emersongate?
Fox News, a bastion of distortion and outright deception, had to issue an extremely rare complete retraction of Emerson's lies.
Emerson has been subsequently "banned for life" from Fox News.
LINK
What lies?I did not see the show in question, but it is the usual policy of networks to issue a disclaimer to the effect that the opinions expressed by guests - and these were opinions - are their own and not those of etc. etc. etc.
I wonder if those Sunday morning talk shows issued a retraction for all of Susan Rice's lies.![]()
I did not see the show in question, but it is the usual policy of networks to issue a disclaimer to the effect that the opinions expressed by guests - and these were opinions . . .
" I got into a tweet fight with the French ambassador who denied that there are any such things as no-go zones, except on the French official website it says there are and it actually has a map of them…."
[A]nd in Britain, it's not just no-go zones, there are actual cities like Birmingham that are totally Muslim where non-Muslims just simply don't go in. And parts of London, there are actually Muslim religious police that actually beat and actually wound seriously anyone who doesn't dress according to Muslim, religious Muslim attire.
- Steven Emerson
What lies?
Sounds like he's purporting to report actual facts, not opinions.
You know as well as I do, the lies about Benghazi.

I did not see the show in question, but it is the usual policy of networks to issue a disclaimer to the effect that the opinions expressed by guests - and these were opinions - are their own and not those of etc. etc. etc.
I wonder if those Sunday morning talk shows issued a retraction for all of Susan Rice's lies.![]()
What you said is true, and that normally is the case. In Fox News' case here, though, the lies were so deliberate and so outlandish, that Fox News credibility (what little they had) was taking a serious beating, to the point where they had to put additional distance between themselves and the liar emerson.
No need to. Susan Rice told the truth as she knew it when it happened. As additional details came out, the Obama administration shared them. You're Monday Morning Quarterbacking.
Susan Rice did not lie, but she wasn't told all the facts either.
You, on the other had, lie even when you do know the facts.
If there was an actual lie, it should be an easy matter to quote it.Even though Emerson was speaking as if he were presenting facts, it was still just opinion.
Originally Posted by Boxlicker101:
I wonder if those Sunday morning talk shows issued a retraction for all of Susan Rice's lies.
I will concede that Susan Rice might have been ignorant of any of the details of the attack, and may have just been parroting what she was told to say, but that does not make them not lies. All the concerned government officials, from debriefings they had received and the videotape of the attack and everything else that was known by them, had to know the true nature of the attack. Lies were passed on by Susan Rice, even though she may not have known they were lies.
Of course I lie. I'm a writer of fiction. What's your excuse?
If there was an actual lie, it should be an easy matter to quote it.
I've never seen anyone quote a statement by Susan Rice that was a lie. Will you be the first? Doubt it.

Maybe you can come up with a direct quote, since Boxlicker failed.Susan Rice would be the U.S. Secretary of State today if it weren't for all of the lies she went out and told about Benghazi. Granted, she was only repeating the lies that the White House TOLD her to tell, but it still cost her that job!
And now John Kerry's out there making a mockery of it. That guy is showing all of us why he lost the presidency in 2004. He was clearly unfit for the job.
Maybe you can come up with a direct quote, since Boxlicker failed.
Just one, in text, with quote marks around it, provably false. Is it impossible or not?
Just one, in text, with quote marks around it, provably false. Is it impossible or not?
Hmm. Chairman Rogers (R) doesn't seem to know that.Here is a you tube of her either lying or passing on a lie. It was well known, several days before this recording was made, the attack was well-planned.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xG64x31wyCU