The white working class has legitimate grievances, but . . .

Politruk

Literotica Guru
Joined
Oct 13, 2024
Posts
13,326
. . . you are sending your mail to the wrong address.

It is not liberals, feminists, minorities, immigrants or Democrats who are to blame for your troubles.

It is the 1%. The executives. The ones who made the decisions to suppress labor unions, install automation, suppress wages, and offshore operations and jobs to countries where labor is cheaper.

It's their fault, nobody else's, that you can't earn a middle-class income by manual labor like your grandfather could. It's their fault half the guys you know are addicted to opioids out of sheer despair.

Go after them with your pitchforks and torches, and stop voting Republican like they want you to.

By the way:

In 2016 the pundits talked a lot about the "white working class" -- and it did make sense to treat them separately, even though of course there are Americans of all colors who live by manual labor. A Marxist analysis oversimplifies the picture. A social class is not defined solely by its economic function. A social class is a social entity, within which people freely socialize, and freely marry, and have a distinct class culture and world-view. The white working class and the black working class are different slices of the same layer of the cake -- they do the same kinds of work, but they live in different neighborhoods, go to different churches, drink in different bars -- and they rarely marry across the racial divide. That is not the taboo it once was, but marriages begin with acquaintances, and most American workers' acquaintances are of their own race. The middle and upper classes are more ethnically diverse.

All this is relevant to present discussions, because white workers VOTE differently from nonwhite workers. Because they have different class cultures and world-views.
 
Last edited:
A major problem in the shift away from the manufacturing base of the economy was that these industrial jobs helped build a rare level of middle-class lifestyle that hasn't been seen since. The Golden Age of working/middle class living standards was a damn unicorn in American, no, scratch that, world history, and one can understand why people who can remember it want it back.
 
A major problem in the shift away from the manufacturing base of the economy was that these industrial jobs helped build a rare level of middle-class lifestyle that hasn't been seen since. The Golden Age of working/middle class living standards was a damn unicorn in American, no, scratch that, world history, and one can understand why people who can remember it want it back.
Restoring labor unions to their former power would help. But it wouldn't really solve the problem. From WWII to the 1970s American manufacturing had the world market pretty much to itself -- but eventually Germany and Japan recovered from the war and got their manufacturing chops together. (In the 1950s and 1960s, "Made in Japan:" was a punchline.) And then around the same time, American businesses figured out how much cheaper the labor was and how much weaker the unions were in Third World countries.

In the world today, the only thing that could possibly make middle-class incomes accessible to the working class is socialism.
 
Everything wrong with the economy is rooted in wealth/income inequality. Focus all your attention on that.
Everything wrong with the economy is rooted in fiat $$$, created out of thin air and backed by nothing.
FIFY
 
Return to sound money and 95% of the stupid shit will stop IMMEDIATELY.
 
Everything wrong with the economy is rooted in wealth/income inequality. Focus all your attention on that.
*chuckle*

It will be much better under proper direction.

Once we level the equity playing field, then all bets are off on the economy.

After all, after the first taking, what will they take next? Go ahead. Take everything. Take it all.




See how far it goes...
 
Return to sound money and 95% of the stupid shit will stop IMMEDIATELY.
They hate Bastiat and love the miracle of MMT.


"Experts" say it's not a commodity and that you can print as much as you want and it will retain its value.

You need to listen to the Democrats here more often, they are more than happy to tell you how to have a "fair" economy...
 
Its so simple, Willie Sutton could tell you, you go where the money is...

Then, you just give it to everybody.

It's "FAIR."
 
Return to sound money and 95% of the stupid shit will stop IMMEDIATELY.
Gong back to gold money is NOT going to help with any problems.

The Free Silver movement of the 19th Century wanted an inflationary monetary policy. Today's goldbugs want a deflationary policy. But both are rooted in the same American tradition of mostly irrational suspicion of the banks and the financial industry. It's the thinking of farmers and craftsmen who assume the only "real" wealth is things you can hold in your hands, and any paper or notional form of wealth must somehow be fake or dishonest. In economics, this is called the physical fallacy.

It is that kind of thinking that led Andrew Jackson to destroy the Second Bank of the United States. No historian or economist will tell you that was a good idea, or did any good at all for the country or the economy.
 
Last edited:
. . . you are sending your mail to the wrong address.

Nope....racist fuck stains like you are the correct address.

It is not liberals,

No we aren't our own problem.

feminists, minorities, immigrants or Democrats who are to blame for your troubles.

Feminist and Democrats 100% own it.....

It is the 1%. The executives.

Nope, they never regulated anyone into poverty.
 
Back
Top