Erozetta
Ink & Ecstasy
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2024
- Posts
- 428
Fully understandable.I suppose this is a good example of differing associations. I had never looked at my substitute descriptions as 'cutesy' or depicting women as being less. I look at it as being 'flowery', even poetic. If I'm describing a scene to be soft, beautiful, 'flowery ', I use those descriptions. If I want to make it feel more animalistic I will use words like pussy and cock.
Like I said, I try to use words to express a theme.
And I didn't mean to imply your use of them was depicting women as less than or the like, just that my association with those words in such usage was typically done in a way that's meant to hype femininity up to an almost comical level to make the MFC seem softer and more innocent instead of depicting that through the character's aesthetic and demeanor. In other words, I typically see it in writing that is reductive to women in a lazy ass way.
I have seen uses of them that don't irritate me, but they are few and far between.
I don't think anyone should stop using those words because there is a large number of people who prefer that wording over the more vulgar terms. I just prefer vulgarity, lol. Particularly when a character is depicted as sweet and innocent otherwise. There's something extra erotic to me about vulgarity from innocence, just as there's something extra creepy about kids in horror movies.