This Needed To be Said

[Rightguide]

The first sentence shows the rest value of the rest of your statement: worthless.
Egalitarian crusade?
I've no idea what drugs you're taking but I will pass.

At least it was "my" statement. There is a sublime cowardice in pretending that an opponent’s refusal to swallow your fashionable dogmas must be the result of a medical delusion. It is the classic refuge of a mind so fragile that the mere existence of a dissenting opinion causes a total system failure. Rather than defend your pristine, utopian theories with logic or evidence, you simply declare the reality too toxic for your sensitive disposition, lift your skirt and take to your heels. You do not "pass" out of a noble sense of superiority; you pass because your rhetorical cupboard is entirely bare, and you lack the stomach for a genuine contest of ideas. Go back to the reassuring warmth of your mutual-admiration society, to the safety of your echo chamber, thoroughly unbruised by thought.

 

[badbabysitter]

Personal circumstances are NEVER sufficient to prove a point. Isn't that what you were telling the world during Covid about holistic treatments?

Basically, YOU FUCKED UP yet again by attempting to show that your personal circumstances are the same for everyone while at the same time you're berating men for not wanting to hook up with abusive women like you.

Both of those things cannot be true at the same time. Either men are so dedicated that they'll stick with you, or they rejected you. Saying otherwise is one of the most asinine things you've posted. But then you're really really good and proving yourself to be asinine in public.

Yet you're describing your personal circumstances as apparently factual, when you say " men are rejecting women because"...then blah blah personal statement


Your life experience is not an empirical universal truth, but are clearly are fine with stating what all men are feeeling. I literally mentioned only my experience and the women I knew

Please point exactly where I stated that men rejected me as well. You keep ascribing to me over and over shit I never say because apparently you can't even remember the last thing you said or was said to you


Jesus christ grampa, you're not supposed to drink with your medication

 

[badbabysitter]

When we're talking about abusive women, of course it is.

Because men walking away from women like you while you call them names is loads better for MEN than sticking to an abusive relationship, while you STILL call them names, could ever be.

I wonder how your life partner will feel after he reads your bullshit and realizes how much you actually hate him because he's a man and you're not.

But at no point were abusive women mentioned in that post or any of mine, you're ascribing a position then judging someone for it, grampa.

For example, you just stated I hate my partner because he's a man, and that he doesn't read my posts. Can you please show where I hate men at the very least; that might be a good place for you to start a reasonable counter argument if you can provide proof of your statement

 

[ll74]

Lmao

 

[HisArpy]

Yet you're describing your personal circumstances as apparently factual, when you say " men are rejecting women because"...then blah blah personal statement

MEN, not ME. There's a difference. It's not even a subtle difference.

Your life experience is not an empirical universal truth, but are clearly are fine with stating what all men are feeeling. I literally mentioned only my experience and the women I knew

I never spoke my personal life experience. I said that the last I'd heard men were rejecting women like you.

YOU responded with your personal relationship story that can't even be verified.

So, once again, you fucked up. What I don't know is whether you like to fuck up so you get attention, because even bad attention is better than being ignored, or you're just an asshole who revels in being an asshole.

My opinion it's both but that's my personal opinion.

Please point exactly where I stated that men rejected me as well. You keep ascribing to me over and over shit I never say because apparently you can't even remember the last thing you said or was said to you

I never said that. I said that men are rejecting abusive women LIKE YOU.

You see, you constantly personalize everything and that leads to you getting upset that someone sees straight through your bullshit and that leads to you posting angry responses where you misstate what actually happened.

It's really bad form because it shows how little you know and that your statements have no depth behind them.

Jesus christ grampa, you're not supposed to drink with your medication

Tell us more about how we shouldn't be drinking liquid medicine. Maybe we should be like you and use it as an enema instead? After all, looking at how much shit you spew it does something. Just not what it was designed to do.

 

[HisArpy]

But at no point were abusive women mentioned in that post or any of mine, you're ascribing a position then judging someone for it, grampa.

For example, you just stated I hate my partner because he's a man, and that he doesn't read my posts. Can you please show where I hate men at the very least; that might be a good place for you to start a reasonable counter argument if you can provide proof of your statement

Seems to me that you went on a rampage touting your personal relationship and then tried to deny being abusive.

IOW, you PROVED my point out of your own mouth.

Better luck next time.

 

[Rightguide]

Yet you're describing your personal circumstances as apparently factual, when you say " men are rejecting women because"...then blah blah personal statement

The great tragedy of the feminist experiment is its total failure to grasp the basic mechanics of masculine psychology. A man who has spent his day battling the cutthroat realities of the marketplace, accumulating wealth and position through sheer force of will, does not return home yearning to debate a miniature version of his own board of directors. He has no desire to marry an attorney in a sundress or a modern-day trail boss with a manicure.

What the successful man seeks, and what he will gladly offer his fortune, his protection, and his name to secure, is the enduring magic of the genuine woman. He seeks that gentle, civilizing force that turns a house into a fortress and a life into a legacy. While the now ubiquitous "boss babe" is left to console herself with her corporate titles and the companionship of a pedigreed cat, the traditional woman quietly inherits the earth, choosing the enduring sovereignty of a family over the fleeting applause of an office cubicle.

 

[badbabysitter]

So all men are rejecting women ...because you said so? You didnt say some, or many, or groups..you just said Men. In the pluralistic.

And I'm abusive how exactly? Could you please show me how I am abusive... and being mean to a man on the internet after he called me a cunt ( that's you grampa), is not, in fact; abuse


You probably don't remember that because of your projections on here which you can't defend. It's really bad form when it shows how little you comprehend of experiences that exist outside of your narrow world view

Classic example of what i mean ; I said drink with your medication, grampa, not liquid medicine, just showing you can't even follow what's just been said to you. Might be time for a cognitive test, the president thinks they're easy, maybe you should try

 

[badbabysitter]

The great tragedy of the feminist experiment is its total failure to grasp the basic mechanics of masculine psychology. A man who has spent his day battling the cutthroat realities of the marketplace, accumulating wealth and position through sheer force of will, does not return home yearning to debate a miniature version of his own board of directors. He has no desire to marry an attorney in a sundress or a modern-day trail boss with a manicure.

What the successful man seeks, and what he will gladly offer his fortune, his protection, and his name to secure, is the enduring magic of the genuine woman. He seeks that gentle, civilizing force that turns a house into a fortress and a life into a legacy. While the now ubiquitous "boss babe" is left to console herself with her corporate titles and the companionship of a pedigreed cat, the traditional woman quietly inherits the earth, choosing the enduring sovereignty of a family over the fleeting applause of an office cubicle.

Or that maybe feminism isnt about exploring your feefees, just saying

 

[Rightguide]

Or that maybe feminism isnt about exploring your feefees, just saying

Go ahead and brush aside the real, measurable wreckage of modern social life with a dismissive sneer about "feefees," the classic mark of the ideological zealot. When the prophecy fails, you do not question the text; you simply curse the flock for having feelings. Go back to your slogans, where complex human nature can be comfortably ignored, and leave the serious business of reality to those who can look at a balance sheet without weeping. Do feel free to keep on asserting what feminism "isn't" because you cannot defend what it has become and then hide behind a casual "just saying" to mask your rhetorical bankruptcy.

 

[ll74]

I always love when misogynists tell people about feminism.. lol

 

[Chernosoth]

Relationships are teamwork. Teams that don't work won't last, particularly as life becomes more work and less ranting on the internet. Couples that work as teams are more likely to survive the trials of parenthood and pass their hard won wisdom to the next generation. Dominant women and submissive men can be teams. If all women try to be dominant, then they run out of submissive men. Between doms and subs, switches may be most of the world's population. Both partners being sometimes dom and sometimes sub may be the healthiest way to maintain a relationship.

 

[badbabysitter]

Go ahead and brush aside the real, measurable wreckage of modern social life with a dismissive sneer about "feefees," the classic mark of the ideological zealot. When the prophecy fails, you do not question the text; you simply curse the flock for having feelings. Go back to your slogans, where complex human nature can be comfortably ignored, and leave the serious business of reality to those who can look at a balance sheet without weeping. Do feel free to keep on asserting what feminism "isn't" because you cannot defend what it has become and then hide behind a casual "just saying" to mask your rhetorical bankruptcy.

Dude, so far in this thread I haven't said a single word about feminism is; only you have. And I'm a freaking feminist. It's why I find your rambling diatribes hilarious

 

[Rightguide]

I always love when misogynists tell people about feminism.. lol

The above grand professor of Lit's egalitarian cult has skillfully propagated the myth that the woman and the movement are one and the same, that to criticize the frantic edicts of a sociology department is to wish harm upon one's own mother. This is nonsense of the purest ll74 level. The anti-feminist does not look upon women with malice; he looks upon them with the detached amusement of a man watching a bird try to swim because a committee of ducks voted that flying was an outdated social construct.

In truth, the real animus against women is found within the feminist camp itself. It is they who look upon the traditional virtues of the sex, grace, domesticity, the quiet governance of the home, and the nurturing of the young, with a venomous and undisguised contempt. They tell the modern woman that she is nothing until she puts on the armor of a middle manager and spends her prime years adding up columns of figures for a corporate master who cares less for her soul than for her productivity. To object to this monstrous swindle is an act of simple gallantry. It is the defense of the genuine woman against a movement that seeks to eradicate her nature and replace her with a sterile, loud-mouthed counterfeit. The true misogyny is you and your kind convincing women that their natural instincts are a form of pathology.

 

[badbabysitter]

The above grand professor of Lit's egalitarian cult has skillfully propagated the myth that the woman and the movement are one and the same, that to criticize the frantic edicts of a sociology department is to wish harm upon one's own mother. This is nonsense of the purest ll74 level. The anti-feminist does not look upon women with malice; he looks upon them with the detached amusement of a man watching a bird try to swim because a committee of ducks voted that flying was an outdated social construct.

In truth, the real animus against women is found within the feminist camp itself. It is they who look upon the traditional virtues of the sex, grace, domesticity, the quiet governance of the home, and the nurturing of the young, with a venomous and undisguised contempt. They tell the modern woman that she is nothing until she puts on the armor of a middle manager and spends her prime years adding up columns of figures for a corporate master who cares less for her soul than for her productivity. To object to this monstrous swindle is an act of simple gallantry. It is the defense of the genuine woman against a movement that seeks to eradicate her nature and replace her with a sterile, loud-mouthed counterfeit. The true misogyny is you and your kind convincing women that their natural instincts are a form of pathology.

I love this. if only those feminists just understood they are just supposed to be babymakers and making me dinner everyone would be happy

 

[Rightguide]

Dude, so far in this thread I haven't said a single word about feminism is; only you have. And I'm a freaking feminist. It's why I find your rambling diatribes hilarious

There is a delightful irony in your claim of detached amusement. You sit on the sidelines of your own ideology, giggling like a schoolgirl at a circus, yet you proudly wear the badge of the very regiment under discussion. To declare yourself a "freaking feminist" while admitting you have not offered a single coherent idea to support the cause is not the triumph of wit you imagine it to be. It is a confession of pure intellectual vacancy. Finally, I had to smile at you announcing your faith as if it were a credential rather than a diagnosis.

 

[Lazaran]

Reichguide goes into that pompous style of posting whenever they are losing an argument.

Such an obvious tell.



Reichguide



We. Told. Them. So.

 

[badbabysitter]

There is a delightful irony in your claim of detached amusement. You sit on the sidelines of your own ideology, giggling like a schoolgirl at a circus, yet you proudly wear the badge of the very regiment under discussion. To declare yourself a "freaking feminist" while admitting you have not offered a single coherent idea to support the cause is not the triumph of wit you imagine it to be. It is a confession of pure intellectual vacancy. Finally, I had to smile at you announcing your faith as if it were a credential rather than a diagnosis.

Because I don't need to. You spell out for me all the deluded and antiquated concepts from over two generations ago that failed then and are still failing now. I have a child, a spouse and I'm also the primary breadwinner in my family. the kicker is, I chose all that for myself. According to you I am a middle manager who has traded my soul for productivity merely because I'm a feminist. You have this completely out of touch concept of feminism, thinking it's about eschewing men and being full of vitriol

 

[Rightguide]

I love this. if only those feminists just understood they are just supposed to be babymakers and making me dinner everyone would be happy

There is a sublime, almost pathetic cowardice in this attempt to morph a serious critique of modern social fragmentation into the primitive grunting once heard in caves. To point out that the specialized division of labor sustained human society for millennia, and that its sudden destruction has produced a spectacular harvest of loneliness and demographic decay, is not to demand that every woman be chained to a stove. It is simply to observe the laws of cause and effect with the cold detachment of a coroner. Yet you insist on hiding behind a clumsy parody because your own fortress has turned to sand.

 

[badbabysitter]

There is a sublime, almost pathetic cowardice in this attempt to morph a serious critique of modern social fragmentation into the primitive grunting once heard in caves. To point out that the specialized division of labor sustained human society for millennia, and that its sudden destruction has produced a spectacular harvest of loneliness and demographic decay, is not to demand that every woman be chained to a stove. It is simply to observe the laws of cause and effect with the cold detachment of a coroner. Yet you insist on hiding behind a clumsy parody because your own fortress has turned to sand.

We also usually died by 40, women died in childbirth all the time, slavery was cool, all this was considered part of the natural order too for millenia. Dude, it's not women who are posting thread after thread after thread about men are the problem. There's no female loneliness epidemic. You're just bleating out the last gasps of the extinction rebellion that still wants a woman in "her place"

 

[Rightguide]

Because I don't need to. You spell out for me all the deluded and antiquated concepts from over two generations ago that failed then and are still failing now. I have a child, a spouse and I'm also the primary breadwinner in my family. the kicker is, I chose all that for myself. According to you I am a middle manager who has traded my soul for productivity merely because I'm a feminist. You have this completely out of touch concept of feminism, thinking it's about eschewing men and being full of vitriol

Here we witness our modern matron produce her marriage certificate, her tax returns, and her nursery bills as a grand philosophical proof that she has successfully cheated human nature is a spectacle of unparalleled comedic genius. You arrive at the debate panting under the immense weight of three distinct, full-time human identities, shoveling gold into the household treasury, playing the role of the devoted spouse, and rearing the next generation, and then look around for applause because you "chose" this frantic exhaustion for yourself. You have managed to reinvent the archaic concept of the old-fashioned pack mule, slap a fashionable ideological label on it, and declare it the ultimate triumph of human endeavor.

 

[badbabysitter]

Here we witness our modern matron produce her marriage certificate, her tax returns, and her nursery bills as a grand philosophical proof that she has successfully cheated human nature is a spectacle of unparalleled comedic genius. You arrive at the debate panting under the immense weight of three distinct, full-time human identities, shoveling gold into the household treasury, playing the role of the devoted spouse, and rearing the next generation, and then look around for applause because you "chose" this frantic exhaustion for yourself. You have managed to reinvent the archaic concept of the old-fashioned pack mule, slap a fashionable ideological label on it, and declare it the ultimate triumph of human endeavor.

You wax so poetical for someone crying about how women can choose something that doesnt involve being your domestic labour

 

[HisArpy]

You wax so poetical for someone crying about how women can choose something that doesnt involve being your domestic labour

No one is forcing you to make any choice other than the one regarding your own future, and future contributions to the human gene pool.

If you choose not to participate, please don't decry those who feel opposite. At least their genetic line won't end with them.

BTW, death during childbirth was rare. If it was commonplace, mankind would have died out a long time ago. Further, don't blame men for the burdens placed upon you by evolution and mother nature. That you attempt to do so only indicates the hate you carry in your heart for everyone and everything including yourself.

 

[Rightguide]

We also usually died by 40, women died in childbirth all the time, slavery was cool, all this was considered part of the natural order too for millenia. Dude, it's not women who are posting thread after thread after thread about men are the problem. There's no female loneliness epidemic. You're just bleating out the last gasps of the extinction rebellion that still wants a woman in "her place"

Above, we witness our modern industrial laborer compare the agonizing horrors of medieval childbirth and chattel slavery to her own terrifying dread of cooking dinner is a comedic masterpiece of the first water. When our contemporary progressive runs completely out of logical ammunition, she invariably drags out the ghosts of the Pharaohs and the plague pits, desperately hoping that the sheer volume of historical misery will somehow distract from her own profound domestic bankruptcy.

BBS's bold assertion that there is "no female loneliness epidemic" is a delusion so grand it deserves a monument in a public park. One need only glance for a single, terrifying moment into the glowing, electronic depths of TikTok to behold the true, unvarnished harvest of your glorious revolution. There, by the tens of thousands, sit the vanguard of the new order, highly paid, thoroughly liberated, and utterly frantic women, weeping into their phones about the mysterious absence of "high-value men," while their apartments echo only with the purring of expensive cats and the hum of modern appliances.

To pretend that men are the ones suffering from an "extinction rebellion" is a brilliant but pitiful piece of psychological projection. The men you so loudly despise have not gone extinct; they have simply gone elsewhere, quietly taking their peace, their productivity, and their fortunes to women who do not look upon a husband as a hostile political entity. You, dear lady, are not witnessing the last gasps of an old order demanding a woman stay in "her place." You are witnessing the cold, indifferent execution of a natural law: if a woman desires to fashion herself into a poor imitation of a man, she will be left to live like one, entirely by herself, with nothing but her corporate triumphs and her video filters to keep her warm at night.

 

[badbabysitter]

No one is forcing you to make any choice other than the one regarding your own future, and future contributions to the human gene pool.

If you choose not to participate, please don't decry those who feel opposite. At least their genetic line won't end with them.

BTW, death during childbirth was rare. If it was commonplace, mankind would have died out a long time ago. Further, don't blame men for the burdens placed upon you by evolution and mother nature. That you attempt to do so only indicates the hate you carry in your heart for everyone and everything including yourself.

I totally empower women that want to be stay at home moms, good on them if that's what they want

But all I'm getting from rightguide is that if I'm not in this gender role, I'm a failure. Which is so fucking dismissive