This Needed To be Said

[HisArpy]

I totally empower women that want to be stay at home moms, good on them if that's what they want

But all I'm getting from rightguide is that if I'm not in this gender role, I'm a failure. Which is so fucking dismissive

From the viewpoint of the human genome, you are.

 

[badbabysitter]

Above, we witness our modern industrial laborer compare the agonizing horrors of medieval childbirth and chattel slavery to her own terrifying dread of cooking dinner is a comedic masterpiece of the first water. When our contemporary progressive runs completely out of logical ammunition, she invariably drags out the ghosts of the Pharaohs and the plague pits, desperately hoping that the sheer volume of historical misery will somehow distract from her own profound domestic bankruptcy.

BBS's bold assertion that there is "no female loneliness epidemic" is a delusion so grand it deserves a monument in a public park. One need only glance for a single, terrifying moment into the glowing, electronic depths of TikTok to behold the true, unvarnished harvest of your glorious revolution. There, by the tens of thousands, sit the vanguard of the new order, highly paid, thoroughly liberated, and utterly frantic women, weeping into their phones about the mysterious absence of "high-value men," while their apartments echo only with the purring of expensive cats and the hum of modern appliances.

To pretend that men are the ones suffering from an "extinction rebellion" is a brilliant but pitiful piece of psychological projection. The men you so loudly despise have not gone extinct; they have simply gone elsewhere, quietly taking their peace, their productivity, and their fortunes to women who do not look upon a husband as a hostile political entity. You, dear lady, are not witnessing the last gasps of an old order demanding a woman stay in "her place." You are witnessing the cold, indifferent execution of a natural law: if a woman desires to fashion herself into a poor imitation of a man, she will be left to live like one, entirely by herself, with nothing but her corporate triumphs and her video filters to keep her warm at night.

Extinction rebellion is not literal extinction, at least not in the context I'm discussing. How do I explain...it's like the people who fought tooth and nail to maintain segregation, turning hoses on people, corrupt police departments allowing cross burning and lynchings; these things exploded in the last few years of the civil rights movement. These were the last desperate gasps of an ideology that was going extinct; it was a sudden burst of energy and activity that failed and became more or less extinct. both right and left claim being the victors in that, but it was just something that faced its own doom, and we have been moving on. All your rantings are just that; these demans for women to know thier place are already considered outdated on both sides of the political spectrum. You're a dinosaur.

 

[badbabysitter]

From the viewpoint of the human genome, you are.

As a woman I'm far more valuable to the species than you

 

[HisArpy]

Extinction rebellion is not literal extinction, at least not in the context I'm discussing. How do I explain...it's like the people who fought tooth and nail to maintain segregation, turning hoses on people, corrupt police departments allowing cross burning and lynchings; these things exploded in the last few years of the civil rights movement. These were the last desperate gasps of an ideology that was going extinct; it was a sudden burst of energy and activity that failed and became more or less extinct. both right and left claim being the victors in that, but it was just something that faced its own doom, and we have been moving on. All your rantings are just that; these demans for women to know thier place are already considered outdated on both sides of the political spectrum. You're a dinosaur.

Extinction takes many forms.

For instance, had your personal ideology been present in any woman pre-modern man, they'd have never made it out of childhood. You are not equal to men, mother nature ensured that. That you are TREATED as an equal is because modern man decided to allow it. That doesn't mean you are, only that you're seen as.

The fact that you're here at all should be telling you that the things you believe in are false. They have to be or you wouldn't be here. You'd have been expelled from the tribe for the good of the tribe. This has been true from the dawn of man all the way up to the late 1800's/early 1900's. Not because you're a woman but because you're a troublemaker who revels in social unrest.

 

[Rightguide]

You wax so poetical for someone crying about how women can choose something that doesnt involve being your domestic labour

In this cultural landscape choked by the frantic wailing of those who view the necessity of earning a living as a personal insult from the cosmos, a good man's dedication to the task at hand shines like a lamp in the dark. We do not demand that the laws of economics be rewritten to soothe our feelings, nor do we ask society to pat us on the head for paying our own way. We look upon the marketplace with the clear eyes of a realist, take up our tools, and pocket our wages with a silent prayer of thanks that we possess the strength and opportunity to do so.

 

[HisArpy]

As a woman I'm far more valuable to the species than you

Only if you choose to be. Which is the point because you push an ideology in which women are encouraged to NOT be progenitors of humanity.

This reduces your contribution value to a nullity because it becomes certain that your genetics are defective since they lead to a demonstrably unstable mentality.

 

[ll74]

The above grand professor of Lit's egalitarian cult has skillfully propagated the myth that the woman and the movement are one and the same, that to criticize the frantic edicts of a sociology department is to wish harm upon one's own mother. This is nonsense of the purest ll74 level. The anti-feminist does not look upon women with malice; he looks upon them with the detached amusement of a man watching a bird try to swim because a committee of ducks voted that flying was an outdated social construct.

In truth, the real animus against women is found within the feminist camp itself. It is they who look upon the traditional virtues of the sex, grace, domesticity, the quiet governance of the home, and the nurturing of the young, with a venomous and undisguised contempt. They tell the modern woman that she is nothing until she puts on the armor of a middle manager and spends her prime years adding up columns of figures for a corporate master who cares less for her soul than for her productivity. To object to this monstrous swindle is an act of simple gallantry. It is the defense of the genuine woman against a movement that seeks to eradicate her nature and replace her with a sterile, loud-mouthed counterfeit. The true misogyny is you and your kind convincing women that their natural instincts are a form of pathology.

You're a misogynist who doesn't understand that you are one.

 

[badbabysitter]

Only if you choose to be. Which is the point because you push an ideology in which women are encouraged to NOT be progenitors of humanity.

This reduces your contribution value to a nullity because it becomes certain that your genetics are defective since they lead to a demonstrably unstable mentality.

I absolutely do not, I just said a few posts ago I totally empower women to be stay at home mom's if they want. You ignoring it or forgetting what was just said is not my fault

I really hope you don't reproduce as short term memory problems are probably something you dont want to hand down

 

[HisArpy]

I absolutely do not, I just said a few posts ago I totally empower women to be stay at home mom's if they want. You ignoring it or forgetting what was just said is not my fault

I really hope you don't reproduce as short term memory problems are probably something you dont want to hand down

Totally empowering is NOT the same as bearing children of your ownsies.

I'd have thought someone who has such a lofty education level would understand that difference.

And of course, now I'm wondering where you stand on the issue of abortion.

 

[Rightguide]

Extinction rebellion is not literal extinction, at least not in the context I'm discussing. How do I explain...it's like the people who fought tooth and nail to maintain segregation, turning hoses on people, corrupt police departments allowing cross burning and lynchings; these things exploded in the last few years of the civil rights movement. These were the last desperate gasps of an ideology that was going extinct; it was a sudden burst of energy and activity that failed and became more or less extinct. both right and left claim being the victors in that, but it was just something that faced its own doom, and we have been moving on. All your rantings are just that; these demans for women to know thier place are already considered outdated on both sides of the political spectrum. You're a dinosaur.

Here we witness a modern polemicist attempt to bridge the chasm of her own logical bankruptcy by dragging the fire hoses of 1960s Birmingham into a debate about modern dating preferences. It truly is a spectacle of supreme, unadulterated comedic genius. When BBS, our contemporary progressive, finds her theories entirely incompatible with the stubborn realities of human biology and the marriage market, she invariably hallucinates a Klansman in the room, desperately hoping the smoke from a historical cross-burning will obscure her total lack of a coherent argument. She has managed to equate a man’s simple preference for a feminine wife with the darkest atrocities of racial terrorism, a rhetorical leap that would stun an Olympic gymnast.

 

[badbabysitter]

Totally empowering is NOT the same as bearing children of your ownsies.

I'd have thought someone who has such a lofty education level would understand that difference.

And of course, now I'm wondering where you stand on the issue of abortion.

Nice attempt at moving goal posts, I do have a kid actually, and I'm still very pro choice. It's almost as if I chose to have a kid. Now can you explain to me how empowering women who choose to be stay at home moms is still ..how did you put it..."pushing an ideology in which women are encouraged to NOT be progenitors of humanity"

 

[badbabysitter]

Here we witness a modern polemicist attempt to bridge the chasm of her own logical bankruptcy by dragging the fire hoses of 1960s Birmingham into a debate about modern dating preferences. It truly is a spectacle of supreme, unadulterated comedic genius. When BBS, our contemporary progressive, finds her theories entirely incompatible with the stubborn realities of human biology and the marriage market, she invariably hallucinates a Klansman in the room, desperately hoping the smoke from a historical cross-burning will obscure her total lack of a coherent argument. She has managed to equate a man’s simple preference for a feminine wife with the darkest atrocities of racial terrorism, a rhetorical leap that would stun an Olympic gymnast.

Omg you are so pedantic, are you ever going to get to a point

 

[Rightguide]

You're a misogynist who doesn't understand that you are one.

There is a sublime, comic arrogance in your belief that anyone who refuses to applaud the corporate state's dismantling of the family must be suffering from a secret psychological pathology. To point out that men of substance prefer charm and peace over a loud-talking imitation of a middle manager is not a hatred of women. It is a profound appreciation for what makes a woman a woman, rather than a sterile unit of industrial productivity. But here you are, deploying an empty political buzzword as a substitute for an actual argument.

 

[Rightguide]

Omg you are so pedantic, are you ever going to get to a point

Because you lack the intellectual muscle to wrestle with the actual argument, you must pretend the discussion is merely a tedious exercise in vocabulary. The point has been made, verified, and delivered to your doorstep. If you have failed to grasp it by now, it is not because the arrow missed the target; it is because your ideological armor is thick enough to shield you from any trace of independent thought. Go back to your slogans and your comfortable illusions; the Professor has finished the lecture.

 

[badbabysitter]

Because you lack the intellectual muscle to wrestle with the actual argument, you must pretend the discussion is merely a tedious exercise in vocabulary. The point has been made, verified, and delivered to your doorstep. If you have failed to grasp it by now, it is not because the arrow missed the target; it is because your ideological armor is thick enough to shield you from any trace of independent thought. Go back to your slogans and your comfortable illusions; the Professor has finished the lecture.

There is no argument. You keep just saying " get back in the kitchen" Women say no. And you're sad. That's really all there is

 

[DeluxAuto]

The great tragedy of the feminist experiment is that it operates on the absurd assumption that men and women want the same things in a partner. It teaches young women to cultivate the traits of an aggressive middle manager, entirely oblivious to the fact that when a man looks for a wife, he is generally not looking for a business rival or a drill Instructor.

By the time the delusion fades, these trailblazers of progress find themselves highly successful, thoroughly exhausted, and utterly alone at age 40 in an apartment shared only with a cat and a collection of self-help books. They have traded the natural protection of the family structure for the cold comfort of a retirement portfolio, discovering too late that a corporation makes a remarkably poor husband, and a corner office is a terribly cold place to spend a lifetime.

From a purely functionalist perspective, human civilization was built on a sharp specialization of labor. For the vast majority of history, the physical demands of building infrastructure, tilling soil, and defending borders fell squarely upon men, whose greater physical capacity was essential to creating a secure environment. In return, women managed the complex, vital spheres of domestic life, child-rearing, and community cohesion.

In the modern era, the rise of the service economy and the welfare state has allowed individuals of both genders to survive independently of one another in a material sense. A man in solitude can outsource his domestic needs to modern appliances and commercial services and find his peace in his work, while a woman can secure financial stability through employment and legal protections without relying on a male provider. At least to the point of a flat tire on a lonely highway in the middle of the night.

Shut the fuck up, old incel. You sound like you just woke up from a nap that started in the 20s.

 

[HisArpy]

Nice attempt at moving goal posts, I do have a kid actually, and I'm still very pro choice. It's almost as if I chose to have a kid. Now can you explain to me how empowering women who choose to be stay at home moms is still ..how did you put it..."pushing an ideology in which women are encouraged to NOT be progenitors of humanity"

Oh, so you're saying that supporting abortion is "empowering women to be stay at home moms?"

Are you fucking daft? Really? You can't see the contradiction in any of that?

No, of course you can't. That would interfere with your faith in the narrative.

 

[ll74]

There is a sublime, comic arrogance in your belief that anyone who refuses to applaud the corporate state's dismantling of the family must be suffering from a secret psychological pathology.

Nope. Your continued hatred towards women unless they conform is easily discerned in every post you make on the topic.

To point out that men of substance prefer charm and peace over a loud-talking imitation of a middle manager is not a hatred of women. It is a profound appreciation for what makes a woman a woman, rather than a sterile unit of industrial productivity. But here you are, deploying an empty political buzzword as a substitute for an actual argument.

So your argument of not being a misogynist is that it's ok because the woman talks to loud?

Misogynism is hatred of women. You just think that you don't because you like some women that don't annoy you. And that's funny...especially as you continue to argue the point.

 

[Chernosoth]

The birthrate was already low, and now we have the jabs lowering fertility for at least the next few decades. Women helping women have babies may become the new definition of feminism. Men who want sex but won't take responsibility of fatherhood may be blacklisted.

 

[BrightShinyGirl]

The birthrate was already low, and now we have the jabs lowering fertility for at least the next few decades. Women helping women have babies may become the new definition of feminism. Men who want sex but won't take responsibility of fatherhood may be blacklisted.

Vaccines don’t lower fertility.

 

[Hel_Books]

Rage-driven leftist women, obsessed with moral signaling, have upended traditional norms and institutions across America.

Ah, no. It is the Trump Administration, with its weaponization of the prosecutorial system, wars declared without Congressional authorization, nepotism, cronyism, self-dealing, conflicts of interest, etc. etc. etc. that have upended traditional norms.

 

[HisArpy]

Ah, no. It is the Trump Administration, with its weaponization of the prosecutorial system, wars declared without Congressional authorization, nepotism, cronyism, self-dealing, conflicts of interest, etc. etc. etc. that have upended traditional norms.

^more of the same old lies.

BTW, it wasn't Trump who indicted a former President multiple times after unlawfully searching his residence. It wasn't Trump who prosecuted a citizen for signing an NDA regarding a legal settlement. It wasn't Trump who created shell companies for the purpose of laundering money from foreign corporations.

 

[Lazaran]

^more of the same old lies.

BTW, it wasn't Trump who indicted a former President multiple times after unlawfully searching his residence. It wasn't Trump who prosecuted a citizen for signing an NDA regarding a legal settlement. It wasn't Trump who created shell companies for the purpose of laundering money from foreign corporations.

Ever wonder why Derpy is on the Lit PB politics board rather than discussing / debating such things with their "lawyer friends"???



I would imagine it is because Derpy was laughed out of the room by their "lawyer friends"



Derpy



We. Told. Them. So.

 

[Lazaran]

Vaccines don’t lower fertility.

Bu, bu, but, Nicki Minaj’s cousin’s brother’s friend said the Covid vaccine made his balls swell…



We. Told. Them. So.

 

[HisArpy]

Ever wonder why Derpy is on the Lit PB politics board rather than discussing / debating such things with their "lawyer friends"???



I would imagine it is because Derpy was laughed out of the room by their "lawyer friends"



Derpy



We. Told. Them. So.

Who says I don't?

The truth is; I meet with friends several times per week. The topics range considerably but politics aren't excluded. I also occasionally cook dinner for select friends whom I've known for decades.

Meanwhile you're reduced to stupid posts on a porn literary website and getting pumped by trolls.