Time to revisit an old Democrat Anti-War Meme

[Ulaven_Demorte]

...and who questions the requests of his own commander on the ground. Obama is going to try his hand at field tactics now.

LMAO!
You are possibly the most blindly partisan douche on the GB. That's really saying something considering those you barely edged out.

How many Generals did Bush and Rumsfeld fire before they found one that endorsed what they wanted to do? I lost count.

 

[miles]

Of course you know, that MonkeyFootball just mopped the floor with you....

Edited to add....your hidden "cancer for kids" in your reply to MonkeyFootball is about as low as one can go.

He's on that praying for children to die thing again?

 

[miles]

Of course you know, that MonkeyFootball just mopped the floor with you....

Edited to add....your hidden "cancer for kids" in your reply to MonkeyFootball is about as low as one can go.

Rob is one screwed up piece of shit. He's repugnant.

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

LMAO!
You are possibly the most blindly partisan douche on the GB. That's really saying something considering those you barely edged out.

How many Generals did Bush and Rumsfeld fire before they found one that endorsed what they wanted to do? I lost count.

You are the expert on being a douchebag as well as armchair generaling and name-calling instead of discussion.

 

[miles]

You are the expert on being a douchebag as well as armchair generaling and name-calling instead of discussion.

He's a pool boy, not a douchebag.

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

Phoning in DC for permission; where do I remember that from?

... what it is ain't exactly clear...

Remind me..
What is the function of the President with regards to the military? Since you claim to be prior service this should be something of a no-brainer even for you.

I'll help you out a little:

Article 2, section 2
The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to Grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.

Why is it that you seem to think that Generals shouldn't seek approval from their Commander in Chief and "Phone in to DC for approval" before making major decisions?

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

You are the expert on being a douchebag as well as armchair generaling and name-calling instead of discussion.

He's a pool boy, not a douchebag.

And the second and third runners up come screaming across the fiish line.

Hiya boys.

 

[miles]

Good morning, stupid.

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

What's the objective?

Where's the needed timeline?

Where are the necessary benchmarks?

What the fuck is the definition of "Mission Accomplished?"

You guys determined this to be the right war, do you have a clue to the right tactic?

While Obama lies, kids looking for jobs have to die for them...

U_D what in-fawkin'-insane tangent are you trying to use to distract from the topic now, an ill-defined mission, with no tangible goals or outcomes led by a commander-in-chief uncomfortable with the language of victory?

Here are the Bush Benchmarks that the Democrats were screaming about in Iraq.

Okay, your war, the right war, now just answer the questions instead of going on with ancillary snipe hunts about Bush and his generals since Obama's hero had to fire several fucking generals until he found one who was comfortable with fighting and victory instead of worrying about defeat...

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

Good morning, stupid.

Good morning to you too sir!





Although I wish you wouldn't call me that...

Mr. off2bed!

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

U_D what in-fawkin'-insane tangent are you trying to use to distract from the topic now, an ill-defined mission, with no tangible goals or outcomes led by a commander-in-chief uncomfortable with the language of victory?

Here are the Bush Benchmarks that the Democrats were screaming about in Iraq.

Okay, your war, the right war, now just answer the questions instead of going on with ancillary snipe hunts about Bush and his generals since Obama's hero had to fire several fucking generals until he found one who was comfortable with fighting and victory instead of worrying about defeat...

Wait.. responding to other people's (and your) posts is trying to distract from the topic now?

I know it's inconvenient to have statements thrown in your face like that but it's hardly off topic now is it?

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

Wait.. responding to other people's (and your) posts is trying to distract from the topic now?

I know it's inconvenient to have statements thrown in your face like that but it's hardly off topic now is it?

Still not answering, just talking around the core issue.


Is it affirmative action?

Is Obama incapable of meeting the Bush standard in his CIC conduct?

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

Still not answering, just talking around the core issue.


Is it affirmative action?

Is Obama incapable of meeting the Bush standard in his CIC conduct?

You can demand answers when you start giving them yourself and don't dance around issues and spew random song lyrics.

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=32241823&postcount=56

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

So, Obama can't be held to a standard...




Open ended war, the hell with the cost, no hurry to get out, not even sure who the enemy is or what will be considered "Mission Accomplished?"

No attempt at discussion, just shouting into the dark from atop a soap box...

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

Here's the logical outcome to trying to stay above the fray and incite the Iranian people to do your dirty work for you...



Attacker detonated explosives strapped to his body during gathering of tribal heads," state Press TV said in a headline, adding that civilians and tribal leaders were also among the victims.

The Revolutionary Guards blamed "foreign elements" linked to the United States for the killings, which underlined deepening instability in Iran's southeast bordering Pakistan and Afghanistan.

Tehran accuses the United States of backing Jundollah to create instability in the country but Washington denies this.

State broadcaster IRIB said the attack occurred in the morning at the gates of a conference hall in the city of Sarbaz in Sistan-Baluchestan. The province is the scene of frequent clashes between security forces, Sunni rebels and drug traffickers.

The two high-ranking commanders were the deputy head of the Guards' ground forces, General Nourali Shoushtari, and the Guards' commander in Sistan-Baluchestan province, General Mohammadzadeh, news agencies reported. Shoushtari was also a senior official of the Guard's elite Qods force, media said.

Citing authorities and experts, a presenter of English-language Press TV said "the finger of accusation is directly pointed at the Jundollah group," referring to ethnic Baluch Sunni insurgents who have been blamed for previous attacks in the region.

FOREIGN ELEMENTS

The Revolutionary Guards pointed the finger at U.S. involvement. "Surely foreign elements, particularly those linked to the global arrogance, were involved in this attack," a Guards statement quoted by television said. Iran often uses the term "global arrogance" to refer to the United States, its old foe.

The Revolutionary Guards is an elite force seen as fiercely loyal to the values of the 1979 Islamic revolution. It handles security in sensitive border areas.

Jundollah, which claimed responsibility for a bomb attack on a Shi'ite mosque in May that killed 25 people, says it is fighting for the rights of the Islamic Republic's minority Sunnis.

Some analysts believe that Jundollah has evolved through shifting alliances with various parties, including the Taliban and Pakistan's ISI intelligence service, who saw the group as a tool against Iran.

Predominantly Shi'ite Muslim Iran has also linked Jundollah to the Sunni Islamist al Qaeda network. Most people in Sistan-Baluchestan are Sunni Muslims and ethnic Baluchis. Iran rejects allegations by Western rights groups that it discriminates against ethnic and religious minorities.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20091018/ts_nm/us_iran_guards_attack

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

More cries of "The CIA LIED!!!"

 

[Frisco_Slug_Esq]

Let me get this straight...

World liberalism supported the Venezuelan, Iranian (remember Barack steadfastly tried not to speak out until it was too late), and Zelaya in the name of Democracy and preventing social unrest and upheaval, but now, in Afghanistan, they do the exact opposite and try to instigate political unrest?

What in the name of Bush Derangement Syndrome is going on here?